| Literature DB >> 30957896 |
Anna-Henrikje Seidlein1, Ines Buchholz2, Maresa Buchholz2, Sabine Salloch1.
Abstract
Quantitative research has called attention to the burden associated with informal caregiving in home nursing arrangements. Less emphasis has been placed, however, on care recipients' subjective feelings of being a burden and on caregivers' willingness to carry the burden in home care. This article uses empirical material from semi-structured interviews conducted with older people affected by multiple chronic conditions and in need of long-term home care, and with informal and professional caregivers, as two groups of relevant others. The high burden of home-care arrangements is unanimously stressed by all three groups involved in the triangle of care. An empirical-ethical investigation of what can be legitimately expected from family members and informal caregivers, informed by Frith's symbiotic empirical ethics approach, was undertaken. Key tenets from the special goods theory and nursing professionalism are used as analytical tools. The study concludes that the current situation may hinder professional development and can reinforce feelings of being a burden to relevant others.Entities:
Keywords: caregiving; chronic illness; dependency; empirical ethics; informal care; long-term home care; qualitative research; self-perceived burden
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30957896 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioethics ISSN: 0269-9702 Impact factor: 1.898