Literature DB >> 30957842

Relationship between feed efficiency and slaughter traits of French Charolais bulls.

Sébastien Taussat1,2, Romain Saintilan1, Daniel Krauss3, David Maupetit3, Marie-Noëlle Fouilloux4, Gilles Renand2.   

Abstract

Improving feed efficiency is of interest to French beef producers so as to increase their profitability. To enable this improvement through selection, genetic correlations with production traits need to be quantified. The objective of this study was to estimate the genetic parameters for growth, feed efficiency (FE), and slaughter performance of young beef bulls of the French Charolais breed. Three feed efficiency criteria were calculated: residual feed intake (RFI), residual gain (RG), and ratio of FE. Data on feed intake, growth, and FE were available for 4,675 Charolais bulls tested in performance test stations and fed with pelleted diet. Between 1985 and 1989, 60 among 510 of these bulls were selected to procreate one generation of 1,477 progeny bulls which received the same pelleted diet at the experimental farm in Bourges. In addition to feed intake, growth, and FE traits, these terminal bulls also had slaughter traits of carcass yield, carcass composition, and weight of visceral organs collected. Genetic parameters were estimated using linear mixed animal models. Between performance test bulls and terminal bulls, the genetic correlation of RFI was 0.80 ± 0.18; it was 0.70 ± 0.21 for RG and 0.46 ± 0.20 for FE. For carcass traits, RFI was negatively correlated with carcass yield (-0.18 ± 0.14) and muscle content (-0.47 ± 0.14) and positively with fat content (0.48 ± 0.13). Conversely, RG and FE were positively correlated with carcass yield and muscle content and negatively with fat content. For the three FE criteria, efficient animals had leaner carcass. For visceral organs (as a proportion of empty body weight), RFI was genetically correlated with the proportions of the 5th quarter (0.51 ± 0.17), internal fat (0.36 ± 0.14), abomasum (0.46 ± 0.20), intestines (0.38 ± 0.17), liver (0.36 ± 0.16), and kidneys (0.73 ± 0.11). Conversely, RG and FE were negatively associated with these traits. The high-energy expenditure associated with the high-protein turnover in visceral organs may explain this opposite relationship between FE and the proportion of visceral organs. Selection for final weight and RFI increased growth and FE in progeny, and also improved carcass yield and muscle content in the carcass. To conclude, determinations of growth and feed intake in performance test stations are effective to select bulls to improve their growth, FE, and muscle content in carcass.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charolais bulls; feed efficiency; genetic parameters; selection response; slaughter traits

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30957842      PMCID: PMC6541800          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Growth, carcass quality, and protein and energy metabolism in beef cattle with different growth potentials and residual feed intakes.

Authors:  F C P Castro Bulle; P V Paulino; A C Sanches; R D Sainz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML).

Authors:  Karin Meyer
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Physiological basis for residual feed intake.

Authors:  R M Herd; P F Arthur
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Performance, residual feed intake, digestibility, carcass traits, and profitability of Angus-Hereford steers housed in individual or group pens.

Authors:  G D Cruz; J A Rodríguez-Sánchez; J W Oltjen; R D Sainz
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency in different breeds of Irish performance-tested beef bulls.

Authors:  J J Crowley; M McGee; D A Kenny; D H Crews; R D Evans; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genetic associations between feed efficiency measured in a performance test station and performance of growing cattle in commercial beef herds.

Authors:  J J Crowley; R D Evans; N Mc Hugh; T Pabiou; D A Kenny; M McGee; D H Crews; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Meat quality of young Nellore bulls with low and high residual feed intake.

Authors:  K Zorzi; S F M Bonilha; A C Queiroz; R H Branco; T L Sobrinho; M S Duarte
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Relationships among measures of growth performance and efficiency with carcass traits, visceral organ mass, and pancreatic digestive enzymes in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  C J Mader; Y R Montanholi; Y J Wang; S P Miller; I B Mandell; B W McBride; K C Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; J J Crowley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; J A Basarab; Z Wang; C Li; M A Price; E K Okine; D H Crews; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feed efficiency and carcass metrics in growing cattle1.

Authors:  David N Kelly; Craig Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Stephen B Conroy; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Beef Heifers in Relation with Growth and Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Gilles Renand; Aurélie Vinet; Virginie Decruyenaere; David Maupetit; Dominique Dozias
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Gene networks for three feed efficiency criteria reveal shared and specific biological processes.

Authors:  Sébastien Taussat; Mekki Boussaha; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Pauline Martin; Eric Venot; Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar; Chris Hozé; Sébastien Fritz; Gilles Renand
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Non-invasive metabolomics biomarkers of production efficiency and beef carcass quality traits.

Authors:  Virginia M Artegoitia; J W Newman; A P Foote; S D Shackelford; D A King; T L Wheeler; R M Lewis; H C Freetly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Common and diet-specific metabolic pathways underlying residual feed intake in fattening Charolais yearling bulls.

Authors:  Ezequiel Jorge-Smeding; Muriel Bonnet; Gilles Renand; Sébastien Taussat; Benoit Graulet; Isabelle Ortigues-Marty; Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.