Literature DB >> 30957401

The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe.

Emily A Martin1, Matteo Dainese2, Yann Clough3, András Báldi4, Riccardo Bommarco5, Vesna Gagic6, Michael P D Garratt7, Andrea Holzschuh1, David Kleijn8, Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki4, Lorenzo Marini9, Simon G Potts7, Henrik G Smith3,10, Diab Al Hassan11, Matthias Albrecht12, Georg K S Andersson3, Josep D Asís13, Stéphanie Aviron14, Mario V Balzan15,16, Laura Baños-Picón13, Ignasi Bartomeus17, Péter Batáry18, Francoise Burel11, Berta Caballero-López19, Elena D Concepción20, Valérie Coudrain21, Juliana Dänhardt3, Mario Diaz20, Tim Diekötter22, Carsten F Dormann23, Rémi Duflot24, Martin H Entling25, Nina Farwig26, Christina Fischer27, Thomas Frank28, Lucas A Garibaldi29, John Hermann22, Felix Herzog12, Diego Inclán30, Katja Jacot12, Frank Jauker31, Philippe Jeanneret12, Marina Kaiser32, Jochen Krauss1, Violette Le Féon33, Jon Marshall34, Anna-Camilla Moonen16, Gerardo Moreno35, Verena Riedinger1, Maj Rundlöf10, Adrien Rusch36, Jeroen Scheper37, Gudrun Schneider1, Christof Schüepp38, Sonja Stutz39, Louis Sutter12, Giovanni Tamburini5, Carsten Thies40, José Tormos13, Teja Tscharntke41, Matthias Tschumi12, Deniz Uzman42, Christian Wagner43, Muhammad Zubair-Anjum44, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter1.   

Abstract

Managing agricultural landscapes to support biodiversity and ecosystem services is a key aim of a sustainable agriculture. However, how the spatial arrangement of crop fields and other habitats in landscapes impacts arthropods and their functions is poorly known. Synthesising data from 49 studies (1515 landscapes) across Europe, we examined effects of landscape composition (% habitats) and configuration (edge density) on arthropods in fields and their margins, pest control, pollination and yields. Configuration effects interacted with the proportions of crop and non-crop habitats, and species' dietary, dispersal and overwintering traits led to contrasting responses to landscape variables. Overall, however, in landscapes with high edge density, 70% of pollinator and 44% of natural enemy species reached highest abundances and pollination and pest control improved 1.7- and 1.4-fold respectively. Arable-dominated landscapes with high edge densities achieved high yields. This suggests that enhancing edge density in European agroecosystems can promote functional biodiversity and yield-enhancing ecosystem services.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Agroecology; arthropod community; biological control; edge density; pest control; pollination; response trait; semi-natural habitat; trait syndrome; yield

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30957401     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  31 in total

1.  Weed diversity is driven by complex interplay between multi-scale dispersal and local filtering.

Authors:  Bérenger Bourgeois; Sabrina Gaba; Christine Plumejeaud; Vincent Bretagnolle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Species traits elucidate crop pest response to landscape composition: a global analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Tamburini; Giacomo Santoiemma; Megan E O'Rourke; Riccardo Bommarco; Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer; Matteo Dainese; Daniel S Karp; Tania N Kim; Emily A Martin; Matt Petersen; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Landscape context affects the sustainability of organic farming systems.

Authors:  Olivia M Smith; Abigail L Cohen; John P Reganold; Matthew S Jones; Robert J Orpet; Joseph M Taylor; Jessa H Thurman; Kevin A Cornell; Rachel L Olsson; Yang Ge; Christina M Kennedy; David W Crowder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Biologia Futura: landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Péter Batáry; András Báldi; Johan Ekroos; Róbert Gallé; Ingo Grass; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2020-06-04

5.  Farm size affects the use of agroecological practices on organic farms in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liebert; Rebecca Benner; Rachel Bezner Kerr; Thomas Björkman; Kathryn Teigen De Master; Sasha Gennet; Miguel I Gómez; Abigail K Hart; Claire Kremen; Alison G Power; Matthew R Ryan
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 17.352

6.  Plant richness, land use and temperature differently shape invertebrate leaf-chewing herbivory on plant functional groups.

Authors:  Ute Fricke; Sarah Redlich; Jie Zhang; Cynthia Tobisch; Sandra Rojas-Botero; Caryl S Benjamin; Jana Englmeier; Cristina Ganuza; Rebekka Riebl; Johannes Uhler; Lars Uphus; Jörg Ewald; Johannes Kollmann; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  A social-ecological framework and toolbox to help strengthening functional agrobiodiversity-supported ecosystem services at the landscape scale.

Authors:  Frederik Gerits; Lies Messely; Bert Reubens; Kris Verheyen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity.

Authors:  Joseph Millard; Charlotte L Outhwaite; Robyn Kinnersley; Robin Freeman; Richard D Gregory; Opeyemi Adedoja; Sabrina Gavini; Esther Kioko; Michael Kuhlmann; Jeff Ollerton; Zong-Xin Ren; Tim Newbold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Better outcomes for pest pressure, insecticide use, and yield in less intensive agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Vesna Gagic; Matthew Holding; William N Venables; Andrew D Hulthen; Nancy A Schellhorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Multi-community effects of organic and conventional farming practices in vineyards.

Authors:  Noémie Ostandie; Brice Giffard; Olivier Bonnard; Benjamin Joubard; Sylvie Richart-Cervera; Denis Thiéry; Adrien Rusch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.