Robin Parish1, Christy Morgan2, Caitlin A Burnett2, Beverly C Baker2, Calland Manning2, Sydney K Sisson2, Elizabeth Rush Shipp2. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health, Related Professions, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson MS, USA. Electronic address: rparish@umc.edu. 2. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health, Related Professions, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson MS, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a complex combination of symptoms resulting from compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. A study that compares the conservative interventions identified in the literature with the actual conservative interventions being implemented by therapists for the treatment of CTS is not presently available. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to examine conservative interventions for CTS as reported by certified hand therapists (CHTs) within various clinical settings. The study also aimed to identify the decision-making process for the selection of CTS interventions. METHOD: CHT members of the American Society of Hand Therapists were surveyed electronically to obtain quantitative data. RESULTS: Patient education, nocturnal orthosis, and ergonomic modifications ranked among the top conservative interventions utilized for CTS, whereas treatments such as magnet therapy, C-TRAC, and heating lamps ranked among the least utilized interventions. When selecting interventions, clinical expertise, research evidence, and patient preferences were all highly valued considerations for CHT. DISCUSSION: Our study offers a unique summary of CHT practice patterns for CTS interventions and the associated decision-making processes. It compares findings with existing literature on this topic, offering researchers and clinicians a glimpse of the CTS practice trends. CONCLUSION: This study may serve to prioritize future research studies based on the prevalence of intervention usage among the experts. It also serves as a guide to those seeking to understand the most common interventions utilized for conservative CTS treatment.
STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive design was used. INTRODUCTION:Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a complex combination of symptoms resulting from compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel. A study that compares the conservative interventions identified in the literature with the actual conservative interventions being implemented by therapists for the treatment of CTS is not presently available. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to examine conservative interventions for CTS as reported by certified hand therapists (CHTs) within various clinical settings. The study also aimed to identify the decision-making process for the selection of CTS interventions. METHOD: CHT members of the American Society of Hand Therapists were surveyed electronically to obtain quantitative data. RESULTS:Patient education, nocturnal orthosis, and ergonomic modifications ranked among the top conservative interventions utilized for CTS, whereas treatments such as magnet therapy, C-TRAC, and heating lamps ranked among the least utilized interventions. When selecting interventions, clinical expertise, research evidence, and patient preferences were all highly valued considerations for CHT. DISCUSSION: Our study offers a unique summary of CHT practice patterns for CTS interventions and the associated decision-making processes. It compares findings with existing literature on this topic, offering researchers and clinicians a glimpse of the CTS practice trends. CONCLUSION: This study may serve to prioritize future research studies based on the prevalence of intervention usage among the experts. It also serves as a guide to those seeking to understand the most common interventions utilized for conservative CTS treatment.
Authors: Fauzia Javed Sheereen; Bibhuti Sarkar; Pallavi Sahay; Mohammad Abu Shaphe; Ahmad H Alghadir; Amir Iqbal; Taimul Ali; Fuzail Ahmad Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 2.667
Authors: Valentina Scalise; Fabrizio Brindisino; Leonardo Pellicciari; Silvia Minnucci; Francesca Bonetti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sandra Jiménez-Del-Barrio; Aida Cadellans-Arróniz; Luis Ceballos-Laita; Elena Estébanez-de-Miguel; Carles López-de-Celis; Elena Bueno-Gracia; Albert Pérez-Bellmunt Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.479