Literature DB >> 30956049

Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study.

Bo Liu1, Wenhui Ma1, Huijie Li1, Tao Wu1, Jia Huo1, Yongtai Han1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The collum femoris preserving (CFP) stem was a specially designed femoral neck preserving component. The incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures with this special stem remain unclear.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of all patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem in our hospital between January 2006 and November 2018. Demographic characteristics and radiological features were obtained from the medical records and the Picture Archiving and Communication System, respectively. The incidence, Vancouver classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified.
RESULTS: A total of 1633 hips were included. The incidence rate of periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem was 3.2%. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 24 patients (45.3%) with Vancouver type A fractures, 27 patients (50.9%) with Vancouver type B fractures, and 2 patients (3.8%) with Vancouver type C fractures. Five independent risk (protective) factors were found, including surgical history (odds ratio [OR] = 3.275, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.192-8.997), neck-shaft angle (OR = 1.104, 95% CI = 1.058-1.152), neck length preserved (OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.850-0.980), canal flare index (OR = 0.636, 95% CI = 0.413-0.980), and bone mineral density (OR = 0.083, 95% CI = 0.016-0.417).
CONCLUSION: The detailed characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients who received a CFP stem were identified in this study. Cracks of the femoral neck and fractures on the front side of the proximal femur were more common in patients with CFP stems. As a kind of a femoral neck preserving stem, the anatomical features (eg, neck-shaft angle, preserving length) of the remaining femoral neck might influence the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with CFP stems.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; complication; femoral stem; hip; periprosthetic fracture; risk factor

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30956049     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Kay; Derek Klavas; Varan Haghshenas; Mimi Phan; Daniel Le
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Relationships between the femoral neck-preserving ratio and radiologic and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty with a collum femoris-preserving stem.

Authors:  Zeming Liu; Hongpeng Hu; Sikai Liu; Jia Huo; Mengnan Li; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hongpeng Hu; Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Xuzhuang Ding; Sikai Liu; Tao Wu; Wenhui Ma; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-31

4.  Fixation of intraoperative proximal femoral fractures during THA using two versus three cerclage wires - a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Toni Wendler; Melanie Edel; Robert Möbius; Johannes Fakler; Georg Osterhoff; Dirk Zajonz
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Three-dimensional morphological study of the proximal femur in Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Yuhui Yang; Weihong Liao; Weiqun Yi; Hai Jiang; Guangtao Fu; Yuanchen Ma; Qiujian Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Finite Element Analysis of Transhumeral and Transtibial Percutaneous Osseointegrated Endoprosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Heath B Henninger; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

7.  Relationship Between Acetabular Hounsfield Unit Values and Periprosthetic Fractures in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Masanori Nishi; Ichiro Okano; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Hidenori Tochio; Yuki Usui; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Comparison of Bone Remodeling Between Collum Femoris-Preserving Stems and Ribbed Stems in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Sikai Liu; Mengnan Li; Xiao Chen; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  High prevalence and undertreatment of osteoporosis in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M M Delsmann; A Strahl; M Mühlenfeld; N M Jandl; F T Beil; C Ries; T Rolvien
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.507

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.