Literature DB >> 30955460

Clinical outcomes of dual 3.5-mm locking compression plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: Comparison with single 4.5-mm locking compression plate fixation.

Joong-Bae Seo1, Kang Heo1, Jong-Heon Yang1, Jae-Sung Yoo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, several in vitro biomechanical studies that used dual small locking plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures have investigated. However, in vivo studies about dual plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures are limited. The purpose of our study was to report the outcomes of dual small plating for humeral shaft fractures in comparison with those of single large fragment plating.
METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients who underwent an open reduction internal fixation for humeral shaft fractures at our institution from September 2014 to December 2017 were included. Single 4.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) fixation was used in the first 40 cases, and dual 3.5-mm LCP fixation was used in the final 20 consecutive cases. Data were collected to define patient characteristics, injury mechanism, clinical outcomes, time to surgery, operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications. Using simple radiography during the follow-up period (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after surgery), the shoulder and elbow joint ranges of motion (ROM) were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Demographic data, time to surgery, surgical time, and estimated blood loss had no significant differences between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in nonunion rate and union rate 3 months after surgery. However, two patients (5%) in the single 4.5-mm LCP fixation group showed metal failure and breakage. No significant differences were found in postoperative shoulder and elbow ROM. Three patients (7.5%) in the single plating group and one patient (5%) in the dual plating group developed radial nerve palsy after surgery. No vascular injury and deep infection were observed in either group.
CONCLUSION: For diaphyseal humeral fractures, dual 3.5-mm LCP fixation to the humerus is a possible treatment choice. This method showed satisfactory union rate, ROM, and complication rate, without increasing surgical time, in comparison with the conventional single 4.5-mm LCP fixation. Level of evidence: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diaphysis; dual plate; fracture; humerus

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30955460     DOI: 10.1177/2309499019839608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)        ISSN: 1022-5536            Impact factor:   1.118


  3 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis technique combined with locking compression plates guided by C-Arm X-Ray machine in treatment of tibial metaphyseal fractures: Curative effect and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Bin Liu; Quan Wang; Hongtao Shang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Comparison of three different surgical treatment methods in humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Bekir Karagoz; Mustafa Erdem; Mustafa Cukurlu; Ismail Agir
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of 1758 patients.

Authors:  Laurent A M Hendrickx; Nick F J Hilgersom; Hassanin Alkaduhimi; Job N Doornberg; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.