Elhussein Elbadry Mahmoud1, Nobuo Adachi2, Amany Sayed Mawas3, Osama Samir Gaarour4, Mitsuo Ochi2. 1. 1 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt. 2. 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. 3. 3 Department of Pathology & Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt. 4. 4 Department of orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Choosing a therapeutic cell source for osteochondral repair remains a challenge. The present study investigated coculturing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from different sources to provide an improved therapeutic cell option for osteochondral repair. METHODS: Dutch and Japanese white rabbits were used in this study, the first for isolating MSCs and the second for creating an osteochondral model in the medial femoral condyle. The 26 rabbit knees were divided randomly into four groups: control ( n = 6), bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) ( n = 7), synovial tissue MSCs (SMSCs) ( n = 7), and cocultured MSCs ( n = 6). Tissue repair was assessed using the Fortier scale, and colony-forming assay was performed. RESULTS: At different cell densities, cocultured and SMSCs formed larger colonies than BMSCs, indicating their high proliferative potential. After 2 months, complete filling of the defect with smooth surface regularity was detected in the cocultured MSC group, although there was no significant difference among the therapeutic groups macroscopically. Also, tissue repair was histologically better in the cocultured MSC group than in the control and SMSC groups, due to repair of the subchondral bone and coverage with hyaline cartilage. Additionally, toluidine blue and collagen-II staining intensity in the repaired tissue was better in the cocultured MSC group than in the remaining groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that cocultured MSCs are a suitable option for the regeneration capability of osteochondral defects due to their enhanced osteochondrogenic potential.
PURPOSE: Choosing a therapeutic cell source for osteochondral repair remains a challenge. The present study investigated coculturing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from different sources to provide an improved therapeutic cell option for osteochondral repair. METHODS: Dutch and Japanese white rabbits were used in this study, the first for isolating MSCs and the second for creating an osteochondral model in the medial femoral condyle. The 26 rabbit knees were divided randomly into four groups: control ( n = 6), bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) ( n = 7), synovial tissue MSCs (SMSCs) ( n = 7), and cocultured MSCs ( n = 6). Tissue repair was assessed using the Fortier scale, and colony-forming assay was performed. RESULTS: At different cell densities, cocultured and SMSCs formed larger colonies than BMSCs, indicating their high proliferative potential. After 2 months, complete filling of the defect with smooth surface regularity was detected in the cocultured MSC group, although there was no significant difference among the therapeutic groups macroscopically. Also, tissue repair was histologically better in the cocultured MSC group than in the control and SMSC groups, due to repair of the subchondral bone and coverage with hyaline cartilage. Additionally, toluidine blue and collagen-II staining intensity in the repaired tissue was better in the cocultured MSC group than in the remaining groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that cocultured MSCs are a suitable option for the regeneration capability of osteochondral defects due to their enhanced osteochondrogenic potential.