Literature DB >> 30955347

Age at Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Associations With Cardiovascular and Mortality Risks.

Naveed Sattar1, Araz Rawshani2, Stefan Franzén3,4, Aidin Rawshani5, Ann-Marie Svensson3, Annika Rosengren2,5, Darren K McGuire6, Björn Eliasson7, Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality for patients with versus without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) appears to vary by the age at T2DM diagnosis, but few population studies have analyzed mortality and CVD outcomes associations across the full age range.
METHODS: With use of the Swedish National Diabetes Registry, everyone with T2DM registered in the Registry between 1998 and 2012 was included. Controls were randomly selected from the general population matched for age, sex, and county. The analysis cohort comprised 318 083 patients with T2DM matched with just <1.6 million controls. Participants were followed from 1998 to 2013 for CVD outcomes and to 2014 for mortality. Outcomes of interest were total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, coronary heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. We also examined life expectancy by age at diagnosis. We conducted the primary analyses using Cox proportional hazards models in those with no previous CVD and repeated the work in the entire cohort.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 5.63 years, patients with T2DM diagnosed at ≤40 years had the highest excess risk for most outcomes relative to controls with adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.05 (1.81-2.33) for total mortality, 2.72 (2.13-3.48) for cardiovascular-related mortality, 1.95 (1.68-2.25) for noncardiovascular mortality, 4.77 (3.86-5.89) for heart failure, and 4.33 (3.82-4.91) for coronary heart disease. All risks attenuated progressively with each increasing decade at diagnostic age; by the time T2DM was diagnosed at >80 years, the adjusted hazard ratios for CVD and non-CVD mortality were <1, with excess risks for other CVD outcomes substantially attenuated. Moreover, survival in those diagnosed beyond 80 was the same as controls, whereas it was more than a decade less when T2DM was diagnosed in adolescence. Finally, hazard ratios for most outcomes were numerically greater in younger women with T2DM.
CONCLUSIONS: Age at diagnosis of T2DM is prognostically important for survival and cardiovascular risks, with implications for determining the timing and intensity of risk factor interventions for clinical decision making and for guideline-directed care. These observations amplify support for preventing/delaying T2DM onset in younger individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart failure; hyperglycemia; obesity; risk factors; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30955347     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  72 in total

1.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Current Challenges and New Hope.

Authors:  Efstratios Koutroumpakis; David Aguilar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 2.  Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course.

Authors:  Amy G Huebschmann; Rachel R Huxley; Wendy M Kohrt; Philip Zeitler; Judith G Regensteiner; Jane E B Reusch
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Early onset of hyperuricemia is associated with increased cardiovascular disease and mortality risk.

Authors:  Lijun Li; Maoxiang Zhao; Chi Wang; Sijin Zhang; Cuijuan Yun; Si Chen; Liufu Cui; Shouling Wu; Hao Xue
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors.

Authors:  Sven Francque; Gyongyi Szabo; Manal F Abdelmalek; Christopher D Byrne; Kenneth Cusi; Jean-François Dufour; Michael Roden; Frank Sacks; Frank Tacke
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Pancreatic β-cells in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: different pathways to failure.

Authors:  Décio L Eizirik; Lorenzo Pasquali; Miriam Cnop
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  A treatment-based algorithm for identification of diabetes type in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Mitra Mosslemi; Hannah L Park; Christine E McLaren; Nathan D Wong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-02-21

7.  An Early-Onset Subgroup of Type 2 Diabetes: A Multigenerational, Prospective Analysis in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Teemu J Niiranen; Elizabeth L McCabe; Mir Henglin; Mohit Jain; Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Susan Cheng
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Salt sensitivity of blood pressure in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Coral D Hanevold
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Association Between Age at Diabetes Onset and Subsequent Risk of Dementia.

Authors:  Claudio Barbiellini Amidei; Aurore Fayosse; Julien Dumurgier; Marcos D Machado-Fragua; Adam G Tabak; Thomas van Sloten; Mika Kivimäki; Aline Dugravot; Séverine Sabia; Archana Singh-Manoux
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Glycaemic markers and all-cause mortality in older adults with and without diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Mary R Rooney; Olive Tang; James S Pankow; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.