Literature DB >> 30954483

A narrative review of studies addressing the clinical effectiveness of perinatal depression screening programs.

Nicole Reilly1, Dawn Kingston2, Deborah Loxton3, Kristina Talcevska4, Marie-Paule Austin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that women be screened for depression as a routine component of maternity care however there is ongoing debate about the benefits of depression screening programs in this context. AIM: This narrative review identifies and describes the clinical effectiveness of perinatal depression screening programs in relation to one or more of the following interrelated domains: referral for additional mental health support or treatment; engagement with mental health support or treatment options; and, maternal mental health or parenting outcomes.
METHODS: English-language studies, published up to July 2017, were identified and their methodological quality was assessed. RCTs and non-RCTs were included.
RESULTS: Overall, the majority of the fourteen studies identified showed that participation in a perinatal depression screening program increases referral rates and service use, and is associated with more optimal emotional health outcomes. One of four available studies demonstrated an improvement in parenting outcomes as a result of participation in an integrated postnatal depression screening program.
CONCLUSION: This small but important body of work is integral to the continuing debate over the merits of screening for depression in the perinatal period. Current evidence favours the overall benefits of perinatal depression screening programs across the three focus areas of this review. Future research should consider a woman's broader psychosocial context and should address the economic as well as clinical outcomes of these programs. Rigorous evaluation of emerging digital approaches to perinatal depression screening is also required.
Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression screening; Effectiveness; Outcomes; Postnatal; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30954483     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Repeated Web-Based Screening for Predicting Postpartum Depression: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kathrin Haßdenteufel; Katrin Lingenfelder; Cornelia E Schwarze; Manuel Feisst; Katharina Brusniak; Lina Maria Matthies; Maren Goetz; Markus Wallwiener; Stephanie Wallwiener
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 2.  Perinatal depression screening: a systematic review of recommendations from member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Authors:  Sarira El-Den; Lily Pham; Isobel Anderson; Shan Yang; Rebekah J Moles; Claire L O'Reilly; Philip Boyce; Karen Hazell Raine; Camille Raynes-Greenow
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.405

3.  'Next Stop: Mum': Evaluation of a Postpartum Depression Prevention Strategy in Poland.

Authors:  Magdalena Chrzan-Dętkoś; Natalia Murawska; Tamara Walczak-Kozłowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Feasibility of universal screening for postpartum mood and anxiety disorders among caregivers of infants hospitalized in NICUs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Snehal Murthy; Laurel Haeusslein; Stephen Bent; Elizabeth Fitelson; Linda S Franck; Christina Mangurian
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.521

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.