Using bioelectrical impedance analysis to compare the treatment of edema with the Unna's boot and noncompression in individuals with venous ulcers.

Venous insufficiency is related to aging. Edema, pathological evolution of venous insufficiency, favors the appearance of venous ulcers as the main complication. Leg ulcers can be treated with compression, the Unna's boot being one of them, and noncompression therapies (conventional dressing). Bioelectrical impedance analysis accurately measures the patient's body fluids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the edema evolution of the venous ulcer-affected lower limb by means of electric bioimpedance with the use of Unna's boot and noncompressive dressing. Fifteen legs with active ulcers were treated from September 2014 to December 2016. The legs were treated with Unna's boot and noncompression therapies on different days with randomized order of events. Bioimpedance was performed in the morning and afternoon to evaluate the increase in edema over the day. All patients were female with ages ranging from 50 to 76 years (mean age: 63 years). According to bioimpedance, the volume of the legs increased with both types of therapy. However, compression therapy was significantly more effective than noncompression therapy. Bioimpedance confirmed that compression therapy (Unna's boot) gives better results than noncompression therapy in relation to the formation of edema over a day in patients with chronic venous ulcers.