BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal, heterogeneous human brain tumor, with regulatory mechanisms that have yet to be fully characterized. Previous studies have indicated that the transcriptional repressor REST (repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor) regulates the oncogenic potential of GBM stem cells (GSCs) based on level of expression. However, how REST performs its regulatory role is not well understood. METHODS: We examined 2 independent high REST (HR) GSC lines using genome-wide assays, biochemical validations, gene knockdown analysis, and mouse tumor models. We analyzed in-house patient tumors and patient data present in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Genome-wide transcriptome and DNA-binding analyses suggested the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) gene, a dominant regulator of neurotransmitter signaling, as a direct target of REST. Biochemical analyses and mouse intracranial tumor models using knockdown of REST and double knockdown of REST and DRD2 validated this target and suggested that DRD2 is a downstream target of REST regulating tumorigenesis, at least in part, through controlling invasion and apoptosis. Further, TCGA GBM data support the presence of the REST-DRD2 axis and reveal that high REST/low DRD2 (HRLD) and low REST/high DRD2 (LRHD) tumors are specific subtypes, are molecularly different from the known GBM subtypes, and represent functional groups with distinctive patterns of enrichment of gene sets and biological pathways. The inverse HRLD/LRHD expression pattern is also seen in in-house GBM tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that REST regulates neurotransmitter signaling pathways through DRD2 in HR-GSCs to impact tumorigenesis. They further suggest that the REST-DRD2 mechanism forms distinct subtypes of GBM.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal, heterogeneous humanbrain tumor, with regulatory mechanisms that have yet to be fully characterized. Previous studies have indicated that the transcriptional repressor REST (repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor) regulates the oncogenic potential of GBM stem cells (GSCs) based on level of expression. However, how REST performs its regulatory role is not well understood. METHODS: We examined 2 independent high REST (HR) GSC lines using genome-wide assays, biochemical validations, gene knockdown analysis, and mousetumor models. We analyzed in-house patienttumors and patient data present in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Genome-wide transcriptome and DNA-binding analyses suggested the dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) gene, a dominant regulator of neurotransmitter signaling, as a direct target of REST. Biochemical analyses and mouseintracranial tumor models using knockdown of REST and double knockdown of REST and DRD2 validated this target and suggested that DRD2 is a downstream target of REST regulating tumorigenesis, at least in part, through controlling invasion and apoptosis. Further, TCGA GBM data support the presence of the REST-DRD2 axis and reveal that high REST/low DRD2 (HRLD) and low REST/high DRD2 (LRHD) tumors are specific subtypes, are molecularly different from the known GBM subtypes, and represent functional groups with distinctive patterns of enrichment of gene sets and biological pathways. The inverse HRLD/LRHD expression pattern is also seen in in-house GBM tumors. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that REST regulates neurotransmitter signaling pathways through DRD2 in HR-GSCs to impact tumorigenesis. They further suggest that the REST-DRD2 mechanism forms distinct subtypes of GBM.
Authors: Ulf D Kahlert; Menglin Cheng; Katharina Koch; Luigi Marchionni; Xing Fan; Eric H Raabe; Jarek Maciaczyk; Kristine Glunde; Charles G Eberhart Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: P Lawinger; R Venugopal; Z S Guo; A Immaneni; D Sengupta; W Lu; L Rastelli; A Marin Dias Carneiro; V Levin; G N Fuller; Y Echelard; S Majumder Journal: Nat Med Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Pratheesh Sathyan; Pascal O Zinn; Anantha L Marisetty; Bin Liu; Mohamed Mostafa Kamal; Sanjay K Singh; Pierre Bady; Li Lu; Khalida M Wani; Bethany L Veo; Joy Gumin; Dina Hamada Kassem; Frederick Robinson; Connie Weng; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Dima Suki; Howard Colman; Krishna P Bhat; Erik P Sulman; Ken Aldape; Rivka R Colen; Roel G W Verhaak; Zhimin Lu; Gregory N Fuller; Suyun Huang; Frederick F Lang; Raymond Sawaya; Monika Hegi; Sadhan Majumder Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Kruttika Bhat; Mohammad Saki; Erina Vlashi; Fei Cheng; Sara Duhachek-Muggy; Claudia Alli; Garrett Yu; Paul Medina; Ling He; Robert Damoiseaux; Matteo Pellegrini; Nathan R Zemke; Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Harley I Kornblum; Frank Pajonk Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Zoltán Kraboth; Bela Kajtár; Bence Gálik; Attila Gyenesei; Attila Miseta; Bernadette Kalman Journal: Cells Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 6.600