Literature DB >> 30953401

The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma diagnosis and management: A cross-sectional study.

Khodayar Goshtasbi1, Mehdi Abouzari1, Omid Moshtaghi1, Ronald Sahyouni1,2, Autefeh Sajjadi1, Harrison W Lin1, Hamid R Djalilian1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of the diagnosis and management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) as well as treatment trends, and to evaluate the role of treatment setting and various specialists in treatment plan.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with VS completed a voluntary and anonymous survey. The questionnaires were distributed through Acoustic Neuroma Association website, Facebook page, and e-mail newsletters from January to March 2017.
RESULTS: In total, 789 VS patients completed the survey. Of those, 414 (52%) underwent surgery; 224 (28%) underwent radiotherapy; and 121 (15%) were observed. General otolaryngologists diagnosed 62% of responders, followed by primary care (11%) and neurotologists (10%). Patients who underwent surgery were significantly younger and had larger tumors compared to those treated with radiation or observation. The ratio of patients having nonsurgical versus surgical resection changed from 1:2 to 1:1 for the periods of 1979 through 2006 versus 2007 through 2017, respectively. Neurosurgeons (40%) and neurotologists (38%) were the most influential in treatment discussion. Neurotologists (P < 0.001) and general otolaryngologists (P = 0.04) were more influential than neurosurgeons for the decision process in patients with smaller tumors. Patients treated at academic versus nonacademic private institutions reported similar tumor sizes (P = 0.27), treatment decisions (P = 0.09), and decision satisfaction (P = 0.78).
CONCLUSION: There is a continuing trend toward nonsurgical management, with approximately half of the patients opting for nonsurgical management. In this cohort, the patients commonly presented with otologic symptoms and otolaryngologists made the most diagnoses. Neurotologists and neurosurgeons were the most influential in treatment discussion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:482-486, 2020.
© 2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vestibular schwannoma; acoustic neuroma; decision satisfaction; influential specialist; treatment trend

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30953401      PMCID: PMC7546694          DOI: 10.1002/lary.27950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  35 in total

1.  Quality of life after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  Davide Tufarelli; Annalisa Meli; Annalisa Alesii; Ezio De Angelis; Carlo Badaracco; Maurizio Falcioni; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma?

Authors:  Mirko Tos; Sven-Eric Stangerup; Per Cayé-Thomasen; Tina Tos; Jens Thomsen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-02

3.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Regional trends and the impact of various patient and hospital factors on outcomes and costs of hospitalization between academic and nonacademic centers after deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease: a United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  Mayur Sharma; Sudheer Ambekar; Bharat Guthikonda; Jessica Wilden; Anil Nanda
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Vestibular schwannomas in the modern era: epidemiology, treatment trends, and disparities in management.

Authors:  Ranjith Babu; Richa Sharma; Jacob H Bagley; Jeffrey Hatef; Allan H Friedman; Cory Adamson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Is hearing preserved following radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma?

Authors:  Adam R Coughlin; Anastasia A Hunt; Samuel P Gubbels
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Thomas J Gal; Jennifer Shinn; Bin Huang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Preoperative audiovestibular handicap in patients with vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Rachel L Humphriss; David M Baguley; Patrick R Axon; David A Moffat
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2006-11

9.  The changing face of acoustic neuroma management in the USA: analysis of the 1998 and 2008 patient surveys from the acoustic neuroma association.

Authors:  Jaymin Patel; Rohit Vasan; Harry van Loveren; Katheryne Downes; Siviero Agazzi
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma: Review of recent literature results.

Authors:  Giuseppina Apicella; Marina Paolini; Letizia Deantonio; Laura Masini; Marco Krengli
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Facial Nerve Function After Microsurgical Resection in Vestibular Schwannoma Under Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  Felix Arlt; Johannes Kasper; Dirk Winkler; Katja Jähne; Michael Karl Fehrenbach; Jürgen Meixensberger; Caroline Sander
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Treatment Analysis and Overall Survival Outcomes of Patients With Bilateral Vestibular Schwannoma.

Authors:  Khodayar Goshtasbi; Mehdi Abouzari; Tyler M Yasaka; Sina Soltanzadeh-Zarandi; Brooke Sarna; Harrison W Lin; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.619

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.