Literature DB >> 30953010

The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity-order trade-off.

Joshua Conrad Jackson1, Michele Gelfand2, Soham De3, Amber Fox4.   

Abstract

For many years, scientists have studied culture by comparing societies, regions or social groups within a single point in time. However, culture is always changing, and this change affects the evolution of cognitive processes and behavioural practices across and within societies. Studies have now documented historical changes in sexism1, individualism2,3, language use4 and music preferences5 within the United States and around the world6. Here we build on these efforts by examining changes in cultural tightness-looseness (the strength of cultural norms and tolerance for deviance) over time, using the United States as a case study. We first develop a new linguistic measure to measure historical changes in tightness-looseness. Analyses show that America grew progressively less tight (i.e., looser) from 1800 to 2000. We next examine how changes in tightness-looseness relate to four indicators of societal order: debt (adjusted for inflation), adolescent pregnancies and crime, and high school attendance, as well as four indicators of creative output: registered patents, trademarks, feature films produced, and baby-naming conformity. We find that cultural tightness correlates negatively with each measure of creativity, and correlates positively with three out of four measures of societal order (fewer adolescent pregnancies, less debt and higher levels of school attendance). These findings imply that the historical loosening of American culture was associated with a trade-off between higher creativity but lower order.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30953010     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0516-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  14 in total

1.  The rise of prosociality in fiction preceded democratic revolutions in Early Modern Europe.

Authors:  Mauricio de Jesus Dias Martins; Nicolas Baumard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies.

Authors:  Joshua Conrad Jackson; Michele Gelfand; Carol R Ember
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Loneliness from Young Adulthood to Old Age: Explaining Age Differences in Loneliness.

Authors:  Louise C Hawkley; Susanne Buecker; Till Kaiser; Maike Luhmann
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2020-11-15

4.  Understanding the social impacts of enforcement activities on illegal wildlife trade in China.

Authors:  Sifan Hu; Yu Cheng; Rong Pan; Fasheng Zou; Tien Ming Lee
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.943

Review 5.  The cultural evolutionary trade-off of ritualistic synchrony.

Authors:  Michele J Gelfand; Nava Caluori; Joshua Conrad Jackson; Morgan K Taylor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Why are song lyrics becoming simpler? a time series analysis of lyrical complexity in six decades of American popular music.

Authors:  Michael E W Varnum; Jaimie Arona Krems; Colin Morris; Alexandra Wormley; Igor Grossmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  When danger strikes: A linguistic tool for tracking America's collective response to threats.

Authors:  Virginia K Choi; Snehesh Shrestha; Xinyue Pan; Michele J Gelfand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice.

Authors:  Joshua Conrad Jackson; Marieke van Egmond; Virginia K Choi; Carol R Ember; Jamin Halberstadt; Jovana Balanovic; Inger N Basker; Klaus Boehnke; Noemi Buki; Ronald Fischer; Marta Fulop; Ashley Fulmer; Astrid C Homan; Gerben A van Kleef; Loes Kreemers; Vidar Schei; Erna Szabo; Colleen Ward; Michele J Gelfand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide.

Authors:  Thomas Talhelm; Alexander S English
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Middle School Students From China's Rice Area Show More Adaptive Creativity but Less Innovative and Boundary-Breaking Creativity.

Authors:  Wu-Jing He; Wan-Chi Wong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.