Pauline Maillard1, Evan Fletcher2, Baljeet Singh2, Oliver Martinez2, David K Johnson2, John M Olichney2, Sarah T Farias2, Charles DeCarli2. 1. From the Imaging of Dementia and Aging Laboratory and Center for Neurosciences (P.M., E.F., B.S., O.M., C.D.), Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (D.K.J., J.M.O., S.T.F., C.D.), University of California, Davis. pmaillard@ucdavis.edu. 2. From the Imaging of Dementia and Aging Laboratory and Center for Neurosciences (P.M., E.F., B.S., O.M., C.D.), Davis, CA; and Department of Neurology (D.K.J., J.M.O., S.T.F., C.D.), University of California, Davis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether free water (FW) content, initially developed to correct metrics derived from diffusion tensor imaging and recently found to be strongly associated with vascular risk factors, may constitute a sensitive biomarker of white matter (WM) microstructural differences associated with cognitive performance but remains unknown. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-six cognitively diverse individuals, aged 77 ± 8 years, received yearly comprehensive clinical evaluations and a baseline MRI examination of whom 224 underwent follow-up MRI. WM microstructural measures, including FW, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity corrected for FW and WM hyperintensity burden were computed within WM voxels of each individual. Baseline and change in MRI metrics were then used as independent variables to explain baseline and change in episodic memory (EM), executive function (EF), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores using linear, logistic, and Cox proportional-hazards regressions. RESULTS: Higher baseline FW and WM hyperintensity were associated with lower baseline EM and EF, higher baseline CDR, accelerated EF and EM decline, and higher probability to transition to a more severe CDR stage (p values <0.01). Annual change in FW was also found to be associated with concomitant change in cognitive and functional performance (p values <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study finds cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between FW content and trajectory of cognitive and functional performance in a large sample of cognitively diverse individuals. It supports the need to investigate the pathophysiologic process that manifests increased FW, potentially leading to more severe WM territory injury and promoting cognitive and functional decline.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether free water (FW) content, initially developed to correct metrics derived from diffusion tensor imaging and recently found to be strongly associated with vascular risk factors, may constitute a sensitive biomarker of white matter (WM) microstructural differences associated with cognitive performance but remains unknown. METHODS: Five hundred thirty-six cognitively diverse individuals, aged 77 ± 8 years, received yearly comprehensive clinical evaluations and a baseline MRI examination of whom 224 underwent follow-up MRI. WM microstructural measures, including FW, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity corrected for FW and WM hyperintensity burden were computed within WM voxels of each individual. Baseline and change in MRI metrics were then used as independent variables to explain baseline and change in episodic memory (EM), executive function (EF), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores using linear, logistic, and Cox proportional-hazards regressions. RESULTS: Higher baseline FW and WM hyperintensity were associated with lower baseline EM and EF, higher baseline CDR, accelerated EF and EM decline, and higher probability to transition to a more severe CDR stage (p values <0.01). Annual change in FW was also found to be associated with concomitant change in cognitive and functional performance (p values <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study finds cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between FW content and trajectory of cognitive and functional performance in a large sample of cognitively diverse individuals. It supports the need to investigate the pathophysiologic process that manifests increased FW, potentially leading to more severe WM territory injury and promoting cognitive and functional decline.
Authors: Jennifer S Rabin; Rodrigo D Perea; Rachel F Buckley; Taylor E Neal; Randy L Buckner; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Trey Hedden Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: C R Jack; P C O'Brien; D W Rettman; M M Shiung; Y Xu; R Muthupillai; A Manduca; R Avula; B J Erickson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Emma J Burton; Ian G McKeith; David J Burn; Michael J Firbank; John T O'Brien Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Maurizio Bergamino; Elizabeth G Keeling; Leslie C Baxter; Nicholas J Sisco; Ryan R Walsh; Ashley M Stokes Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Marie Altendahl; Pauline Maillard; Danielle Harvey; Devyn Cotter; Samantha Walters; Amy Wolf; Baljeet Singh; Visesha Kakarla; Ida Azizkhanian; Sunil A Sheth; Guanxi Xiao; Emily Fox; Michelle You; Mei Leng; David Elashoff; Joel H Kramer; Charlie Decarli; Fanny Elahi; Jason D Hinman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sheelakumari Raghavan; Robert I Reid; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Christopher G Schwarz; David S Knopman; Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Prashanthi Vemuri Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-05-19
Authors: Joseph M Gullett; Andrew O'Shea; Damon G Lamb; Eric C Porges; Deirdre M O'Shea; Ofer Pasternak; Ronald A Cohen; Adam J Woods Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 6.556