Literature DB >> 30951976

Myocardial constructive work and cardiac mortality in resynchronization therapy candidates.

Elena Galli1, Arnaud Hubert2, Virginie Le Rolle2, Alfredo Hernandez2, Otto A Smiseth3, Philippe Mabo2, Christophe Leclercq2, Erwan Donal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that myocardial constructive work (CW) assessed by pressure-strain loops (PSLs) is an independent predictor of a volumetric response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of CW in predicting the cardiac outcome of heart failure patients undergoing CRT.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study including 166 CRT candidates (ejection fraction [EF] ≤35%, QRS duration ≥120 milliseconds). Two-dimensional standard echocardiography and speckle-tracking echocardiography were performed before CRT and at 6-month follow-up. PSLs were used to assess myocardial CW.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 4 years (range 1.3-5 years), cardiac death occurred in 14 patients (8%). A multivariable Cox regression analysis including age, coronary artery disease, and septal flash showed that CW≤888 mm Hg% was the only independent predictor of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio 4.23, 95% CI 1.08-16.5, P = .03). After 6 months of CRT, a 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume was observed in 118 (71%) patients, and a CRT volumetric response was identified. Among CRT responders, the concomitant presence of CW ≤888 mm Hg% identified a subgroup of patients at high risk of cardiac death (P = .04 in the log-rank test). The addition of CW ≤888 mm Hg% to a model including age, coronary artery disease, septal flash, and CRT response caused a significant increase in model power for the prediction of cardiac death (χ2: 12.6 vs 25.7, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: The estimation of left ventricular CW by PSLs is a relatively novel tool that allows for the prediction of cardiac outcome in CRT candidates.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30951976     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Myocardial work is a predictor of exercise tolerance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Florian Schrub; Frédéric Schnell; Erwan Donal; Elena Galli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Myocardial Work: Methodology and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadopoulos; Özge Özden Tok; Konstantina Mitrousi; Ignatios Ikonomidis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Impact of blood pressure changes on myocardial work indices in hypertensive patients in a day.

Authors:  Xinhao Li; Quande Liu; Wuyun Bao; Mengmeng Li; Yu Zhang; Xiaoyu Wan; Mei Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  The non-invasive assessment of myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis: clinical applications.

Authors:  Dawud Abawi; Tommaso Rinaldi; Alessandro Faragli; Burkert Pieske; Daniel A Morris; Sebastian Kelle; Carsten Tschöpe; Concetta Zito; Alessio Alogna
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Impact of Age and Heart Rate on Strain-Derived Myocardial Work in a Population of Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Ciro Santoro; Federica Ilardi; Roberta Esposito; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Mario Enrico Canonico; Federica Buongiorno; Grazia Canciello; Maria Prastaro; Maria-Angela Losi; Giovanni Esposito
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-12

6.  Myocardial Work Assessment for the Prediction of Prognosis in Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Felix Hedwig; Olena Nemchyna; Julia Stein; Christoph Knosalla; Nicolas Merke; Fabian Knebel; Andreas Hagendorff; Felix Schoenrath; Volkmar Falk; Jan Knierim
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.