Literature DB >> 30951924

The impact of errors on healthcare professionals in the critical care setting.

Amanpreet P Kaur1, Andrew T Levinson1, Joao Filipe G Monteiro2, Gerardo P Carino3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medical errors occur at high rates in intensive care units (ICUs) and have great consequences. The impact of errors on healthcare professionals is rarely discussed. We hypothesized that issues regarding blame and guilt following errors in the ICU exist and may be dependent on type of practitioner, level of experience, and error type.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was conducted of members of a large critical care medical society addressing three clinical scenarios of procedural, diagnostic and treatment errors.
RESULTS: Nine hundred one practitioners responded. In all scenarios, negative feeling after medical errors occurred in all practitioners regardless of experience or field. Surgeons and anesthesiologists showed higher negative responses after procedural errors while internal medicine and emergency medicine practitioners had higher negative responses after diagnostic errors. Survey respondents identified multiple ways to address these adverse feelings, including debriefing with the medical team (68%), talking with colleagues (68%) and discussing with patients and families (36%).
CONCLUSIONS: In critical care, blame and guilt after medical errors are common and affect all providers. Critical care practitioners have identified methods which may help mitigate adverse feeling after medical errors, including debriefing and talking with colleagues. Hospitals may benefit from developing these types of strategies after medical errors.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Blame culture; Medical error; Patient safety; Second victim

Year:  2019        PMID: 30951924     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Research Agenda for Diagnostic Excellence in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Christina L Cifra; Jason W Custer; James C Fackler
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Intensity of nursing work in public hospitals.

Authors:  Tatiane Araújo Dos Santos; Handerson Silva Santos; Elieusa E Silva Sampaio; Cristina Maria Meira de Melo; Ednir Assis Souza; Cláudia Geovana da Silva Pires
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-05-11

3.  A Scoping Review on the Concept of Physician Caring.

Authors:  David S Burstein; Faith Svigos; Akash Patel; Neha K Reddy; Kelly N Michelson; Linda C O'Dwyer; Mark Linzer; Jeffrey A Linder; David Victorson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.473

4.  Evaluating effort-reward imbalance among nurses in emergency departments: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Mengge Tian; Heping Yang; Xiaoxv Yin; Yafei Wu; Guopeng Zhang; Chuanzhu Lv; Ketao Mu; Yanhong Gong
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Understanding burnout and moral distress to build resilience: a qualitative study of an interprofessional intensive care unit team.

Authors:  Jennifer Hancock; Tobias Witter; Scott Comber; Patricia Daley; Kim Thompson; Stewart Candow; Gisele Follett; Walter Somers; Corry Collins; Janet White; Olga Kits
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  Point-of-care Ultrasound in Morbidity and Mortality Cases in Emergency Medicine: Who Benefits the Most?

Authors:  Andrew J Goldsmith; Hamid Shokoohi; Michael Loesche; Ravish C Patel; Heidi Kimberly; Andrew Liteplo
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-10-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.