Literature DB >> 30951137

A Meta-Analysis on Nitrogen Retention by Buffer Zones.

Elena Valkama, Kirsi Usva, Merja Saarinen, Jaana Uusi-Kämppä.   

Abstract

Buffer zones, established between agricultural fields and water bodies, are widely used as a measure to reduce N in surface runoff and groundwater. However, the literature indicates inconsistent results on the N removal efficiency of buffer zones between studies. We performed a weighed meta-analysis on the buffer zone effects on NO-N and total N in surface runoff and groundwater by summarizing 46 studies published between 1980 and 2017. The overall effects of buffer zones were a 33 (-48 to -17%, = 25) and 70% (-78 to -62%, = 38) NO-N reduction in surface runoff and in groundwater, respectively, compared with controls with no buffer zone. In addition, buffer zones reduced the total N in surface runoff by 57% (-68 to -43%, = 16). The effects of buffer zones on N retention were consistent across continents and in different climates. Nitrogen retention increased with increasing initial N concentrations discharged from the source of pollution. According to a meta-regression, the N removal efficiency in surface runoff decreased in consort with increasing buffer zone age. Otherwise, the meta-analysis revealed no effects of buffer zone characteristics such as the width or species number (for grass buffer zones) on the N retention in surface runoff and groundwater. Unlike groundwater quality, which responded equally well regardless of the source of pollution, buffer zone type, or buffer zone age, surface water quality is more sensitive, and it might not be satisfactorily improved by tree buffer zones or aged buffer zones, or when the source of pollution originates from grass production fields.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30951137     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2018.03.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity of Riparian Buffer Designs to Climate Change-Nutrient and Sediment Loading to Streams: A Case Study in the Albemarle-Pamlico River Basins (USA) Using HAWQS.

Authors:  Santosh R Ghimire; Joel Corona; Rajbir Parmar; Gouri Mahadwar; Raghavan Srinivasan; Katie Mendoza; John M Johnston
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Soil CO2 emissions in cropland with fodder maize (Zea mays L.) with and without riparian buffer strips of differing vegetation.

Authors:  J C Dlamini; L M Cardenas; E H Tesfamariam; R M Dunn; J Evans; J M B Hawkins; M S A Blackwell; A L Collins
Journal:  Agrofor Syst       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Phytodepuration of Nitrate Contaminated Water Using Four Different Tree Species.

Authors:  Luca Regni; Maria Luce Bartucca; Euro Pannacci; Francesco Tei; Daniele Del Buono; Primo Proietti
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10

4.  Promise and performance of agricultural nutrient management policy: Lessons from the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe; Mikael Skou Andersen; Mark V Brady; Morten Graversgaard; Emils Kilis; Anders Branth Pedersen; Samuli Pitzén; Helena Valve
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.