Literature DB >> 30951014

Selective Costimulation Blockade With Antagonist Anti-CD28 Therapeutics in Transplantation.

Bernard Vanhove1,2,3, Nicolas Poirier4, Jean-Paul Soulillou2,3, Gilles Blancho2,3.   

Abstract

Nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors and uncontrolled effector function of alloreactive T lymphocytes are main drivers of transplant dysfunctions. T lymphocytes either directly damage tissues or indirectly promote inflammation and antibody responses. Beside inhibitors of calcium-dependent pathways and antimetabolites, modulators of T-cell costimulation are elected pharmacological tools to enable interference with immune-mediated transplant dysfunctions. CD28 and CTLA-4 are major costimulatory and coinhibitory cell surface signaling molecules interacting with CD80/86, known to be critically important for immune response of committed T cells and regulation. Initial bench to beside translation, 2 decades ago, resulted in the development of belatacept CTLA-4 fused with an immunoglobulin Fc domain, a biologic inhibiting interaction of both CD28 and CTLA-4 with CD80/86. Despite proven effectiveness in inhibiting alloimmune responses, clinical use of belatacept in kidney transplantation revealed a substantially high incidence of acute, cell-mediated rejection. The cause of belatacept-resistant graft rejection was allocated to elevated pretransplant frequencies of CD28 memory T cells. Owing to different requirements in CD28 costimulatory and CTLA-4 coinhibitory signals to control naive and memory T cells, selective antagonists of CD28-CD80/86 interactions have been developed on the rationale that preservation of CTLA-4-mediated regulatory mechanisms would result in a better control of alloreactivity and would represent a regulatory T-cell-compatible immunosuppression. After the successful testing of selective CD28 antagonists in First In Human studies, this review delineates how this shift in paradigm performed in preclinical transplantation models and evaluates its clinical potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30951014     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation: A New Era.

Authors:  Amber N Carrier; Anjali Verma; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Manuel Pascual; Yannick D Muller; Alban Longchamp; Chandra Bhati; Leo H Buhler; Daniel G Maluf; Raphael P H Meier
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Current status of xenotransplantation research and the strategies for preventing xenograft rejection.

Authors:  Qiao Zhou; Ting Li; Kaiwen Wang; Qi Zhang; Zhuowen Geng; Shaoping Deng; Chunming Cheng; Yi Wang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Joining Forces in Basic Science: ITS Meeting 2.0.

Authors:  Nina Pilat; Fadi Issa; Xunrong Luo; Anita Chong; Jonathan Bromberg; Katja Kotsch
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 4.  Costimulation Blockade in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.

Authors:  Dimitrios Giannis; Dimitrios Moris; Linda C Cendales
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Multimarker profiling identifies protective and harmful immune processes in heart failure: findings from BIOSTAT-CHF.

Authors:  George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Jasper Tromp; Wouter Ouwerkerk; João Pedro Ferreira; Stefan D Anker; John G Cleland; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Chim C Lang; Marco Metra; Nilesh J Samani; Rudolf A de Boer; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Adriaan A Voors; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 13.081

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.