Literature DB >> 30950985

Prevalence and prognosis of lead masses in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices without infection.

Pier Giorgio Golzio1, Daniele Errigo, Mattia Peyracchia, Elisa Gallo, Simone Frea, Davide Castagno, Carlo Budano, Carla Giustetto, Mauro Rinaldi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Finding of intracardiac lead masses in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices remains controversial, as such masses have been observed in cases of exclusively local infections whereas they have not been recognized in patients with positive cultures of intravascular lead fragments. In this study, we aim to describe the prevalence of intracardiac lead masses in true asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, to identify their predictive factors and to define their prognostic impact at long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Seventy-eight consecutive patients admitted over a 6-month period for elective generator replacement without clinical evidence of infection were evaluated by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and prospectively followed at in-clinic follow-up visits.
RESULTS: Lead masses were found in 10 patients (12.8%). These patients had more frequently right ventricular dysfunction at univariate analysis (OR 2.71, P = 0.010) and after baseline variables adjustment (hazard ratio 6.25, P = 0.012). At 5-year follow-up without any specific therapy, none of the patients suffered from any cardiac device infections, or developed clinical signs of infections.
CONCLUSION: There is an evidence of clinical lead masses in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. The value of these findings is still debated for aetiological interpretation and for therapeutic strategy, but they are not necessarily associated with an infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30950985     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  4 in total

1.  The prognostic value of transesophageal echocardiography after transvenous lead extraction: landscape after battle.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

2.  European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).

Authors:  Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Vassil Traykov; Paola Anna Erba; Haran Burri; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Jeanne Poole; Giuseppe Boriani; Roberto Costa; Jean-Claude Deharo; Laurence M Epstein; Laszlo Saghy; Ulrika Snygg-Martin; Christoph Starck; Carlo Tascini; Neil Strathmore
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Prognostic Value of Preoperative Echocardiographic Findings in Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  "Ghost", a Well-Known but Not Fully Explained Echocardiographic Finding during Transvenous Lead Extraction: Clinical Significance.

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.