Michael P Motley1,2, Kasturi Banerjee1,3, Bettina C Fries1,2,3. 1. Infectious Disease Division, Department of Medicine. 2. Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook. 3. Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Northport, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent developments in the development of monoclonal antibodies to treat bacterial disease, including preclinical advances and the status of current clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is becoming increasingly promising in the infectious disease field. Though bacterial exotoxins continue to be a mainstay of mAb targets, searches for protein targets on the surface of bacteria have uncovered new mechanisms of antibody-mediated action against bacteria. Additionally, surveys of the polysaccharide serotype prevalence among antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations have yielded opportunities to leverage human selective pressures to our clinical advantage. Several mAb candidates are progressing through clinical development with great promise, especially those with structures altered to provide maximum benefit. Although other clinical trials have recently proved unsuccessful, these failures and lessons from immune profiling provide opportunities to understand how vulnerabilities of certain targets may change in different disease states. SUMMARY: Despite the hurdles of identifying effective targets and understanding how mAbs provide protection within different infections, we show that the progress made in these fields is a positive indication of mAbs becoming more widely accepted as the future for treating bacterial infections.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent developments in the development of monoclonal antibodies to treat <span class="Disease">bacterial disease, including preclinical advances and the status of current clinical trials. RECENT <span class="abstract_title">FINDINGS: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy is becoming increasingly promising in the infectious disease field. Though bacterial exotoxins continue to be a mainstay of mAb targets, searches for protein targets on the surface of bacteria have uncovered new mechanisms of antibody-mediated action against bacteria. Additionally, surveys of the polysaccharide serotype prevalence among antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations have yielded opportunities to leverage human selective pressures to our clinical advantage. Several mAb candidates are progressing through clinical development with great promise, especially those with structures altered to provide maximum benefit. Although other clinical trials have recently proved unsuccessful, these failures and lessons from immune profiling provide opportunities to understand how vulnerabilities of certain targets may change in different disease states. SUMMARY: Despite the hurdles of identifying effective targets and understanding how mAbs provide protection within different infections, we show that the progress made in these fields is a positive indication of mAbs becoming more widely accepted as the future for treating bacterial infections.
Authors: Yan Q Xiong; Angeles Estellés; L Li; W Abdelhady; R Gonzales; Arnold S Bayer; Edgar Tenorio; Anton Leighton; Stefan Ryser; Lawrence M Kauvar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Raksha Jain; V V Beckett; M W Konstan; F J Accurso; J L Burns; N Mayer-Hamblett; Carlos Milla; D R VanDevanter; J F Chmiel Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Avanish K Varshney; Galina A Kuzmicheva; Jian Lin; Kevin M Sunley; Rodney A Bowling; Tzu-Yu Kwan; Heather R Mays; Anu Rambhadran; Yanfeng Zhang; Rebecca L Martin; Michael C Cavalier; John Simard; Sushma Shivaswamy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Harald Rouha; Susanne Weber; Philipp Janesch; Barbara Maierhofer; Karin Gross; Ivana Dolezilkova; Irina Mirkina; Zehra C Visram; Stefan Malafa; Lukas Stulik; Adriana Badarau; Eszter Nagy Journal: Virulence Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 5.882
Authors: Alexey Ruzin; Yuling Wu; Li Yu; Xiang-Qing Yu; David E Tabor; Hoyin Mok; Christine Tkaczyk; Kathryn Jensen; Terramika Bellamy; Lorin Roskos; Mark T Esser; Hasan S Jafri Journal: Clin Transl Immunology Date: 2018-01-23
Authors: Rajesh Vij; Zhonghua Lin; Nancy Chiang; Jean-Michel Vernes; Kelly M Storek; Summer Park; Joyce Chan; Y Gloria Meng; Laetitia Comps-Agrar; Peng Luan; Sophia Lee; Kellen Schneider; Jack Bevers; Inna Zilberleyb; Christine Tam; Christopher M Koth; Min Xu; Avinash Gill; Marcy R Auerbach; Peter A Smith; Steven T Rutherford; Gerald Nakamura; Dhaya Seshasayee; Jian Payandeh; James T Koerber Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Emily E Radke; Stuart M Brown; Adam J Pelzek; Yi Fulmer; David N Hernandez; Victor J Torres; Isaac P Thomsen; William K Chiang; Andy O Miller; Bo Shopsin; Gregg J Silverman Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anh K Lam; Hannah Panlilio; Jennifer Pusavat; Cassandra L Wouters; Erika L Moen; Robert E Brennan; Charles V Rice Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Oliver W Meldrum; Kylie B R Belchamber; Kiarina D Chichirelo-Konstantynovych; Katie L Horton; Tetyana V Konstantynovych; Merete B Long; Melissa J McDonnell; Lidia Perea; Alberto L Garcia-Basteiro; Michael R Loebinger; Raquel Duarte; Holly R Keir Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Giuseppe Pantaleo; Bruno Correia; Craig Fenwick; Victor S Joo; Laurent Perez Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2022-06-20 Impact factor: 112.288
Authors: Travis B Nielsen; Jun Yan; Brian M Luna; Yuli Talyansky; Matthew Slarve; Robert A Bonomo; Brad Spellberg Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Camila Boniche-Alfaro; Brenda Kischkel; Luciana Thomaz; Monique Maria Carvalho-Gomes; Leila M Lopes-Bezerra; Joshua Daniel Nosanchuk; Carlos Pelleschi Taborda Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 7.561