Literature DB >> 30950110

Chronic continuous abdominal pain: evaluation of diagnostic features, iatrogenesis and drug treatments in a cohort of 103 patients.

Eleesia Kilgallon1, Dipesh H Vasant2,3, Darren Green4, Philip L Shields5, Shaheen Hamdy1,2, Simon Lal1,2, Peter Paine1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic continuous abdominal pain (CCAP) is characteristic of centrally mediated gastrointestinal pain disorders. It consumes significant healthcare resources yet is poorly understood, with minimal cohort-specific data in the literature. AIMS: To examine in a large cohort of CCAP patients, (a) diagnostic features, (b) iatrogenic impact of opioids and surgery, (c) drug treatment effects and tolerance.
METHODS: Consecutive tertiary CCAP referrals to a neurogastroenterology clinic (2009-2016) were reviewed for Rome IV and neuropathic pain criteria. Medical, surgical and drug histories, interventions and outcomes were correlated with clinical diagnosis and associated opioid use.
RESULTS: Of 103 CCAP patients (mean age 40 ± 14, 85% female), 50% had physiological exacerbations precluding full Rome IV Centrally Mediated Abdominal Pain Syndrome criteria. However, there were no significant differences between patients who satisfied Rome IV criteria and those who did not. Overall, 81% had allodynia (a nonpainful stimulus evoking pain sensation). Opioid use was associated with allodynia (P = 0.003). Prior surgery was associated with further operations post CCAP onset (P < 0.001). Although 68% had undergone surgical interventions, surgery did not resolve pain in any patient and worsened pain in 35%. Whilst duloxetine was the most effective neuromodulator (P = 0.003), combination therapy was superior to monotherapy (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: This is currently the largest cohort CCAP dataset that supports eliciting neuropathic features, including allodynia, for a positive clinical diagnosis, to guide treatment. Physiological exacerbation of CCAP may represent visceral allodynia, and need not preclude central origin. Use of centrally acting neuromodulators, and avoidance of detrimental opioids and surgical interventions appear to predict favourable outcomes.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30950110     DOI: 10.1111/apt.15241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in the Management of Severe Gastrointestinal Dysmotility.

Authors:  Dipesh H Vasant; Simon Lal
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-10

2.  The management of adult patients with severe chronic small intestinal dysmotility.

Authors:  Jeremy M D Nightingale; Peter Paine; John McLaughlin; Anton Emmanuel; Joanne E Martin; Simon Lal
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal pain.

Authors:  Asbjørn M Drewes; Anne E Olesen; Adam D Farmer; Eva Szigethy; Vinciane Rebours; Søren S Olesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 52.329

4.  Evaluation of the short-term efficacy of local analgesic (lidocaine) and opioid analgesic (sufentanil) on patients with centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hang Yang; Honglin Chen; Bing Hu
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.409

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.