BACKGROUND: Positive staining for SOX10 and the S100 protein are often used in the evaluation of challenging melanocytic neoplasms including melanoma in patient samples. SOX-10 positivity of non-melanocytes in re-excision specimen could complicate the evaluation of invasive melanoma with an invasive desmoplastic component. Therefore, quantifiable data regarding the positivity of SOX-10 in scars will help dermatopathologists to better identify false positive staining. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 50 re-excision specimens from 2013 to 2017, with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS). Blocks of re-excision specimens containing scars were stained for SOX-10; results were evaluated by a board-certified dermatopathologist. The sum of the five highest numbers of high-power field (HPF) counts as a proxy for "SOX-10 stain factor," and cell morphological features were analyzed. MART-1 and CD68 immunohistochemical staining was performed to study possible lineage of these SOX-10 positive cells. RESULTS: All 50 specimens showed varying degrees of SOX-10 positivity for histiocytes. SOX-10 positive histiocytes were present in 86% of re-excision scar tissues, of which 71.3% had spindle-shaped or angulated nuclei, and 61.8% had nuclear sizes larger than typical lymphocytes (7 μm). Within the same area of scars, CD68 staining was floridly positive, where as MART-1 staining was overwhelmingly negative. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates a potential diagnostic pitfall of using SOX-10 to evaluate re-excision specimens of melanocytic neoplasms and also suggests a previously undescribed staining pattern in scars of SOX-10 positive cells that are not melanocytes. We postulate that such SOX-10 positive cells may represent a small fraction of histiocytes routinely found in scar tissue.
BACKGROUND: Positive staining for SOX10 and the S100 protein are often used in the evaluation of challenging melanocytic neoplasms including melanoma in patient samples. SOX-10 positivity of non-melanocytes in re-excision specimen could complicate the evaluation of invasive melanoma with an invasive desmoplastic component. Therefore, quantifiable data regarding the positivity of SOX-10 in scars will help dermatopathologists to better identify false positive staining. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 50 re-excision specimens from 2013 to 2017, with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS). Blocks of re-excision specimens containing scars were stained for SOX-10; results were evaluated by a board-certified dermatopathologist. The sum of the five highest numbers of high-power field (HPF) counts as a proxy for "SOX-10 stain factor," and cell morphological features were analyzed. MART-1 and CD68 immunohistochemical staining was performed to study possible lineage of these SOX-10 positive cells. RESULTS: All 50 specimens showed varying degrees of SOX-10 positivity for histiocytes. SOX-10 positive histiocytes were present in 86% of re-excision scar tissues, of which 71.3% had spindle-shaped or angulated nuclei, and 61.8% had nuclear sizes larger than typical lymphocytes (7 μm). Within the same area of scars, CD68 staining was floridly positive, where as MART-1 staining was overwhelmingly negative. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates a potential diagnostic pitfall of using SOX-10 to evaluate re-excision specimens of melanocytic neoplasms and also suggests a previously undescribed staining pattern in scars of SOX-10 positive cells that are not melanocytes. We postulate that such SOX-10 positive cells may represent a small fraction of histiocytes routinely found in scar tissue.
Authors: Katharina Hochheiser; Han Xian Aw Yeang; Teagan Wagner; Candani Tutuka; Andreas Behren; Jason Waithman; Christopher Angel; Paul J Neeson; Thomas Gebhardt; David E Gyorki Journal: Clin Transl Immunology Date: 2019-12-25