Literature DB >> 30950077

Expanded definitions of the 'good death'? Race, ethnicity and medical aid in dying.

Cindy L Cain1, Sara McCleskey2.   

Abstract

The range of end-of-life options is expanding across North America. Specifically, medical aid in dying (AID), or the process by which a patient with a terminal illness may request medical assistance with hastening death, has recently become legal in eight jurisdictions in the United States and all of Canada. Debates about AID often rely on cultural constructions that define some deaths as 'good' and others as 'bad'. While research has found commonalities in how patients, family members and health care providers define good and bad deaths, these constructions likely vary across social groups. Because of this, the extent to which AID is seen as a route to the good death also likely varies across social groups. In this article, we analyse qualitative data from six focus groups (n = 39) across three racial and ethnic groups: African American, Latino and white Californians, just after a medical AID law was passed. We find that definitions of the 'good death' are nuanced within and between groups, suggesting that different groups evaluate medical AID in part through complex ideas about dying. These findings further conversations about racial and ethnic differences in choices about end-of-life options.
© 2019 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End of life; aid in dying; ethnicity; focus groups; good death; race

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30950077      PMCID: PMC6786270          DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Health Illn        ISSN: 0141-9889


  44 in total

Review 1.  Killing us softly: the dangers of legalizing assisted suicide.

Authors:  Marilyn Golden; Tyler Zoanni
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.554

2.  The Liberty to Die: California Enacts Physician Aid-in-Dying Law.

Authors:  Ryan P Clodfelter; Eli Y Adashi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups.

Authors:  Jung Kwak; William E Haley
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-10

4.  Explaining the emergence of euthanasia law in the Netherlands: how the sociology of law can help the sociology of bioethics.

Authors:  Heleen Weyers
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2006-09

5.  Revisiting medicalisation and 'natural' death.

Authors:  J E Seymour
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Oregon's experience with aid in dying: findings from the death with dignity laboratory.

Authors:  Barbara Coombs Lee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The end of life and the family: hospice patients' views on dying as relational.

Authors:  Alex Broom; Emma Kirby
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2012-06-28

8.  Access to Aid-in-Dying in the United States: Shifting the Debate From Rights to Justice.

Authors:  Mara Buchbinder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The continued social transformation of the medical profession.

Authors:  Stefan Timmermans; Hyeyoung Oh
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2010

10.  Locating care at the end of life: burden, vulnerability, and the practical accomplishment of dying.

Authors:  John I MacArtney; Alex Broom; Emma Kirby; Phillip Good; Julia Wootton; Jon Adams
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-11-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sociological contributions to race and health: Diversifying the ontological and methodological agenda.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Oh Nelson; Karen Lutfey Spencer
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2021-08-26

2.  Nurses' decision-making about cancer patients' end-of-life skin care in Wales: an exploratory mixed-method vignette study protocol.

Authors:  Ray Samuriwo; Candida Lovell-Smith; Sally Anstey; Claire Job; Jane Hopkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.