Literature DB >> 30949732

Reliability and validity of pelvic floor muscle displacement measurements during voluntary contractions.

Helene Moser1,2, Helena Luginbuehl3, Jean-Pierre Baeyens4, Lorenz Radlinger3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Understanding the functioning of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) is crucial in female PFM rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to determine the intra-session retest reliability and validity to evaluate the quantity of PFM displacement.
METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study examined the PFM displacement of 17 young healthy nulliparous women in the midsagittal plane. Three maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and five fast voluntary contractions (FVCs) were simultaneously examined with an electromagnetic tracking system (ETS) and transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) and expressed in millimeters (mean, SD). To evaluate reliability and validity, the analysis of variance, intraclass coefficient (2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable difference (MDD) were calculated.
RESULTS: Maximal voluntary contractions and FVCs in supine position measured by an ETS (TAUS) showed a displacement of MVC: 3.5 ± 1.9 mm (7.8 ± 4.5 mm), FVC: 3.5 ± 2.4 mm (7.6 ± 5.3 mm), and during standing of MVC: 5.2 ± 1.6 mm (9.4 ± 3.8 mm) and FVC: 4.8 ± 2.5 mm (9.7 ± 4.1 mm). Intraclass correlation for the ETS (TAUS) measurement varied between 0.79 and 0.89 (0.61 and 0.74), SEM 0.52 and 1.03 mm (1.54 and 3.2 mm), and MDD 1.54 and 3.2 mm (6.64 and 7.53 mm). The correlation between an ETS and TAUS varied between 0.53 and 0.67.
CONCLUSIONS: For MVC and FVC, ETS measurements are highly reliable and TAUS measurements are moderately reliable for both contraction types. The correlation between the TAUS and ETS measurements is moderate. An ETS seems to be a reliable and valid measurement tool for evaluating PFM displacement during voluntary contractions. In future studies, the reproducibility and validity of ETS measurements need to be investigated in impact activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecology; Movement; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; Ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 30949732     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03932-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  3 in total

1.  Pelvic floor muscle function in the standing position in women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Sally Mastwyk; Jodie McClelland; Melinda Mary Cooper; Helena C Frawley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 2.  Effects of Pelvic-Floor Muscle Training in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Approached with Surgery vs. Conservative Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Espiño-Albela; Carla Castaño-García; Esther Díaz-Mohedo; Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Vaginal palpation versus transabdominal ultrasound in the comprehension of pelvic floor muscle contraction after vaginal delivery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mayumi Ikeda; Akiko Mori
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.