Literature DB >> 30949543

Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated With Hospital-Onset Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Mica Blauw1, Betsy Foxman2, Juan Wu3, Janice Rey1, Neelay Kothari4, Anurag N Malani1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are common in hospitals, but the literature surrounding PVC-associated bacteremia is lacking. We describe incidence rates, risk factors, and outcomes related to PVC-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), a common cause of hospital-onset (HO) SAB.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study conducted at a 537-bed teaching community hospital during 2015-2016. Cases were adult inpatients with HO SAB with infectious diseases documentation of the PVC as the only source of bacteremia. Cases were matched 1:2 with controls on approximate PVC insertion date, age, mortality prediction score, and insurance type. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. PVC utilization was estimated by a point-prevalence survey from July 2017.
RESULTS: Of 205 SAB episodes, 160 were community-onset and 45 were HO; 16 (36%) HO cases were PVC-associated. Cases (n = 16) were more likely than controls (n = 32) to have a PVC placed in the antecubital area (odds ratio [OR], 11.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-95.7; P = .02) and PVC duration ≥4 days (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1-15.2; P = .04). The point prevalence of at least 1 PVC in adult inpatients was 86%, and the incidence density of HO PVC-associated SAB was 0.15 per 1000 PVC-days. The mean length of stay for cases was 13.2 days. All cases successfully completed parenteral antibiotics with a mean treatment length of 23.6 days.
CONCLUSIONS: PVC-associated SAB is a common cause of HO SAB that results in significant morbidity. PVC placement in the antecubital area and line duration should be minimized to reduce HO SAB.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; bacteremia; hospital-onset; peripheral venous catheter; phlebitis

Year:  2019        PMID: 30949543      PMCID: PMC6441569          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


Approximately 80% of hospitalized patients in the United States have 1 or more intravenous catheters placed during the course of their hospital stay [1-3]. Although intravenous catheters are common in hospitals, they are associated with increased risk of bacteremia, which can prolong length of hospital stay and increase health care costs by an estimated $20 000–30 000 per episode of bacteremia [3-5]. Peripheral venous catheter (PVC)–associated bacteremia occurs in approximately 0.18% of patients [3, 6–8]. Worldwide, an estimated 1 billion or more PVCs are inserted in hospitalized patients each year [9]. Although the rate of bacteremia is lower in patients with PVCs than central venous catheters (CVCs), the sheer number of PVCs in use indicates that a large number of patients are at risk for infection [4, 10]. Unlike central line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), episodes of PVC-associated bacteremia are not reportable to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and thus are not used as a pay-for-performance measure by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [11]. There is less research on these types of infections when compared with CLABSIs. Staphylococcus aureus causes the majority of PVC-related bloodstream infections. Among S. aureus bloodstream infections, PVCs are identified as the source 4%–35% of the time and are one of the most common causes of hospital-onset (HO) S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) [3, 7, 8, 12–19]. Given the relative paucity of data surrounding PVC-associated SAB, we aimed to describe the incidence rates, modifiable risk factors, and outcomes related to HO PVC–associated SAB.

METHODS

Study Design and Population

We conducted a retrospective case–control study of HO SAB episodes among adult inpatients (age > 18 years) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, at Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital in Ann Arbor, Michigan, a 537-bed, non-university-affiliated, community teaching hospital. Cases of HO SAB were defined as a positive blood culture occurring on or after day 3 of admission, with the date of admission considered day 1. This study was approved by the hospital’s institutional review board.

Prevalence and Incidence

We conducted a point-prevalence survey of all adult inpatients (except the mother/baby and psychiatric units) in July 2017 to estimate the proportion of inpatients with ≥1 PVCs. Hospital administrative data were used to derive the total number of inpatient days during the study period. We calculated the approximate number of PVC days during the study period and used these to estimate the incidence rate for HO SAB during the study period per 1000 PVC days. Through the point-prevalence survey, the anatomic location of PVC placement was determined based on nursing documentation.

Case and Control Definitions

Cases were defined as patients with a first HO episode of bacteremia with a blood culture positive for S. aureus, documentation by the consulting infectious diseases physician that the PVC was the source of bacteremia (infectious phlebitis documented at the PVC site including palpable cord and/or exudate), and no other source of bacteremia determined by medical record review through adjudication by an infection preventionist and 2 infectious disease physicians. Sources of bacteremia listing >1 possible source or unclear source were defined as unknown. Recurrent episodes of SAB that were attributed to the same source in the same patient, but on multiple hospitalizations, were excluded. Controls were selected from those who had a PVC in place during a portion of their inpatient visit. We excluded patients from the mother/baby and psychiatric units. Each case of HO PVC–associated SAB was matched to 2 controls with PVCs based on PVC insertion date (±3 days), age (±5 years), an internal predicted risk of mortality (PRISM) score [20], and insurance type (no insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurance). Patients who died within 2 days of PVC placement were excluded from the control selection. Two controls per case were randomly selected through computer-generated random digits from the group of eligible controls.

Variable Definitions

We reviewed electronic medical records for patient demographic characteristics, underlying medical history, and characteristics associated with PVCs. A description of the number of insertion attempts is presented. However, this variable was not included in bivariate or multivariate analyses because documentation was missing for a large proportion of the study population. Duration of PVC placement is presented as a dichotomous variable. The dichotomy of 4 days was utilized based on previous recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to change PVCs every 72–96 hours [2].

Statistical Analysis

We described demographic and clinical characteristics using simple descriptive statistics such as mean (SD) and number (percentage). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value between exposure of PVC and outcome of HO SAB in a univariate and multivariate fashion. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Given the exploratory nature of the study, we decided a priori not to adjust the P value for multiple testing.

RESULTS

Study Population

There were 214 episodes of SAB between January 2015 and December 2016. Of these, 2 occurred in pediatric patients and were excluded. Another 7 episodes were excluded because they were a recurrent episode of bacteremia in which the same source was attributed as the cause of infection in each episode. Of the remaining 205 episodes of SAB, 45 were defined as being HO, and 160 were community-onset. The sources of all the bacteremia episodes are presented in Table 1. There were 16 HO SAB episodes (12 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and 4 methicillin-resistant S. aureus) that were associated with a PVC (Figure 1).
Table 1.

Sources of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

SourceTotal S. aureus Bacteremia (n = 205), No. (%)Hospital-Onset S. aureus Bacteremia (n = 45), No. (%)Community-Onset S. aureus Bacteremia (n = 160), No. (%)
Soft tissue/bone67 (32.7)4 (8.9)63 (39.4)
PVC18 (8.8)16 (35.6)2 (1.3)
CVC or PICC14 (6.8)7 (15.6)7 (4.4)
Hemodialysis13 (6.3)2 (4.4)11 (6.9)
Pulmonary8 (3.9)0 (0.0)8 (5.0)
Endovascular7 (3.4)1 (2.2)6 (3.8)
Biliary1 (0.5)0 (0.0)1 (0.6)
Urinary3 (1.5)0 (0.0)3 (1.9)
Unknown74 (36.1)15 (33.3)59 (36.9)

Abbreviations: CVC, central intravenous catheter; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter.

Figure 1.

Flowchart identifying 16 hospital-onset PVC-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia cases from all S. aureus bacteremia episodes from 2015 to 2016. Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter.

Sources of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Abbreviations: CVC, central intravenous catheter; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter. Flowchart identifying 16 hospital-onset PVC-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia cases from all S. aureus bacteremia episodes from 2015 to 2016. Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter. During the study period, there were 123 604 patient-days. A point-prevalence survey found 276 of 320 (86%) adult inpatients had at least 1 PVC, with 51.3% of PVCs in the arm, 27.6% in the antecubital area, and 20.8% in the hand or wrist. We used these results to estimate the number of PVC days during the study period (0.86 × 123 604 = 106 299 PVC-days). The estimated incidence density of PVC-related HO SAB was 0.15 per 1000 PVC-days.

Identification of Risk Factors

Cases and controls were similar with respect to most demographic and underlying medical comorbidities (Table 2). However, cases were almost 12 times as likely to have PVCs placed in the antecubital area vs all other placement locations (odds ratio [OR], 11.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–95.7; P = .02), 4 times more likely than controls to have a PVC duration of ≥4 days (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.1–15.2; P = .04), 2.6 times more likely to have PVC placement in the field or emergency department vs in an inpatient unit or the operating room (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.7–9.1; P = .15), and 2.3 times more likely to be male (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.7–8.1; P = .18). Additionally, the mean length of stay for cases was 13.2 days (SD, 3.8 days; range, 8–23 days) vs 5 days (SD, 4.8 days; range, 1–24 days) for controls.
Table 2.

Association of Demographic, Underlying Medical History, and Clinical Characteristics in the Study Population and Univariate Associations With Hospital-Onset PVC-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Cases (N = 16), No. (%)Controls (N = 32), No. (%)Conditional Logistic Regression, Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) P Value
Demographic characteristics
Age
 <65 y7 (43.7)13 (40.6)RefRef
 ≥65 y9 (56.3)19 (59.4)0.6 (0.05–7.4).69
Predicted risk of internal mortality score [11]
 <28 (50.0)16 (50.0)--
 ≥28 (50.0)16 (50.0)--
Insurance type
 Medicare9 (56.3)18 (56.3)--
 Medicaid3 (18.8)6 (18.8)--
 Commercial insurance4 (25.0)8 (25.0)--
Sex
 Male11 (68.8)15 (46.9)2.3 (0.7–8.1).18
 Female5 (31.3)17 (53.1)RefRef
Underlying medical history
Hospital admission 30 days prior3 (18.8)9 (28.1)0.5 (0.1–2.8).46
Comorbidities
 Diabetes mellitus10 (62.5)14 (43.8)2.6 (0.6–10.6).19
 Intravenous drug use0 (0.0)2 (6.3)--
 End-stage renal disease1 (6.3)3 (9.4)0.7 (0.1–6.4).73
 Chronic kidney disease6 (37.5)13 (40.6)0.8 (0.2–3.4).81
 Peripheral vascular disease1 (6.3)3 (9.4)0.7 (0.1–6.4).73
 Coronary artery disease5 (31.3)5 (15.6)2.2 (0.6–8.4).25
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2 (12.5)2 (6.3)2.0 (0.3–14.2).49
 Liver cirrhosis0 (0.0)2 (6.3)--
 Malignancy3 (18.8)7 (21.9)0.8 (0.2–4.1).79
 Immunosuppression3 (18.8)2 (6.25)--
Length of stay
 <10 d1 (6.2)29 (90.6)--
 ≥10 d15 (93.8)3 (9.4)--
Characteristics associated with PVCs
Anatomical site of PVC insertion
 Antecubital area12 (75.0)10 (31.3)11.9 (1.5–95.7).02
 All other sites4 (25.0)22 (68.8)RefRef
Clinical setting of PVC insertion
 Pre-inpatient (EMS/ED) 10 (62.5)13 (40.6)2.6 (0.7–9.1).15
 Inpatient (inpatient unit/operating room)6 (37.5)19 (59.4)RefRef
Insertion attempts
 18 (50.0)12 (37.5)--
 >11 (6.2)3 (9.4)--
 Unknown7 (43.8)17 (53.1)--
Duration of PVC
 <4 d6 (37.5)23 (71.9)RefRef
 ≥4 d10 (62.5)9 (28.1)4.0 (1.1–15.2).04

Odds ratios were not able to be obtained for all risk factors due to some characteristics being used as matching criteria and some risk factors being present in amounts too low to calculate an odds ratio.

Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; EMS, emergency medical service; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter.

Association of Demographic, Underlying Medical History, and Clinical Characteristics in the Study Population and Univariate Associations With Hospital-Onset PVC-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Odds ratios were not able to be obtained for all risk factors due to some characteristics being used as matching criteria and some risk factors being present in amounts too low to calculate an odds ratio. Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; EMS, emergency medical service; PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter. We evaluated the interaction between anatomical PVC placement and line duration using a logistic regression model (Table 3). Results showed that a patient with antecubital PVC placement and a line duration of ≥4 days was 50.4 times (95% CI, 2.4–1043.8; P = .01) more likely to have PVC-associated HO SAB than a patient without antecubital PVC placement and a line duration of less than 4 days. A patient with antecubital PVC placement and a line duration of <4 days was 12.6 times (95% CI, 1.3–117.5; P = .03) more likely to have PVC-associated HO SAB than a patient without antecubital PVC placement and a line duration of less than 4 days.
Table 3.

Evaluation of Interaction Between Antecubital PVC Placement and Line Duration for Hospital-Onset PVC-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Using Logistic Regression

Anatomic PlacementLine DurationOdds Ratios (95% Confidence Interval)
Model β (standard error)2.5315 (1.1)1.3876 (0.8)-
Antecubital<4 d12.6 (1.3–117.5)
Nonantecubital≥4 d4.0 (0.8–20.6)
Antecubital≥4 d50.4 (2.4–1043.8)
ReferenceNonantecubital<4 d1.0

Abbreviation: PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter.

aN = 16 cases and 32 controls.

Evaluation of Interaction Between Antecubital PVC Placement and Line Duration for Hospital-Onset PVC-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Using Logistic Regression Abbreviation: PVC, peripheral intravenous catheter. aN = 16 cases and 32 controls.

Characteristics of S. aureus Bacteremia Cases

All 16 case patients were seen by an infectious diseases physician and received parenteral antibiotics; the 12 patients with MSSA infections were treated with cefazolin, whereas 2 patients with a MRSA infection were treated with vancomycin and 2 were treated with daptomycin. The mean length of treatment was 23.6 days (SD, 11.1 days; range, 14–42 days). All case patients had an echocardiogram; 5 (31.3%) had a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), 5 (31.3%) had a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), and 6 (37.4%) had both a TTE and a TEE. Eleven (69%) of the case patients had a thrombus identified on ultrasound near the PVC insertion site, 1 (6%) had endocarditis, and 2 (13%) had metastatic spread to other sites, including septic emboli to the lungs and septic arthritis of the shoulder. No case patients died within 30 days of their hospital stay.

Discussion

In this case–control study conducted between January 2015 and December 2016, we report a number of important findings. First, PVC-associated SAB was the most common cause of HO SAB, representing 36% of all episodes, whereas it rarely caused community-onset SAB (1%). Second, PVCs placed in the antecubital area and PVCs with durations of ≥4 days were significantly more likely to be associated with HO PVC–associated SAB. We find, as have others, that PVC-associated SAB is both an under-recognized and common cause of HO SAB [7, 8, 12–16]. The finding that antecubital PVC placement was associated with PVC-associated SAB is consistent with previous studies. A recent experience from a tertiary care center of PVC-associated SAB found 27 cases of thrombophlebitis associated with SAB that occurred in an old site where the PVC had already been removed [7]. A majority of these infections (16/27, 59%) were related to a PVC site in the proximal upper extremity (proximal forearm and antecubital fossa) [7]. Another retrospective study of 24 cases of PVC-associated SAB in adult patients found that the PVC was placed in the antecubital area in 67% of patients with PVC-associated SAB [12]. It is likely that the risk associated with placement of PVC in the antecubital area and SAB is related to the skin microbiome of the antecubital area. The antecubital fossa has more Staphylococcus species than other areas of the upper and lower arms [21, 22]. Bacteremia arises from colonization of the external surface of catheters and migration of the bacteria down the PVC and into the bloodstream [23]. Additionally, the antecubital area, being a point of flexion, may cause trauma to the PVC insertion site, allowing bacteria to colonize the external surface of the catheter more frequently. When bacteria are present in high densities, as they are in the antecubital area, colonization is much more likely [23]. Our finding that duration of PVCs for ≥4 days is associated with HO PVC–associated SAB differs from recent literature findings and policy changes by the CDC. Previously, it was recommended that all PVCs be replaced routinely every 72–96 hours to reduce the risk of phlebitis and bacteremia [2]. A recent systematic review also concluded that dwell times of PVCs beyond 3 days increase the risk of PVC colonization and, thereby, the risk of PVC-associated bacteremia [8]. However, there have been several studies that specifically recommended PVC replacement upon clinical indication vs routine replacement every 72–96 hours [2, 24–29]. A review of 7 randomized controlled trials that compared routine removal of PVCs with removal of PVCs only when clinically indicated found no evidence to support changing catheters every 72 to 96 hours and recommended that hospitals should consider modifying PVC policies to changing devices only when clinically indicated [2]. However, this review only included 3 cases of PVC-associated bacteremia. Recommendations from the CDC state that there is no need to replace PVCs more frequently than every 72–96 hours in adults, but leave replacement of PVCs when clinically indicated as an unresolved issue [30]. Replacement upon clinical indication allows the opportunity for the duration of PVCs to be longer, which our study, similar to others, shows is a risk factor for HO PVC–associated SAB [3, 12, 17, 19]. Many hospitals, including our own, have transitioned to PVC replacement upon clinical indication. Clinical setting of PVC placement and sex may be associated with HO PVC–associated SAB. However, these estimates are uncertain, with wide confidence intervals, and cannot be investigated further in this study. Other studies, however, have found an association between the department in which the PVC was placed and SAB [3, 17, 23, 31]. A prospective study of all health care–associated SAB episodes found that >60% of all PVC-associated SAB episodes were related to a PVC that was placed in the emergency department or by the ambulance service [3]. Lines placed before inpatient admission have been associated with higher infection rates—likely associated with less strict adherence to aseptic techniques [23]. One study implemented several key measures to reduce the risk of SAB during an intervention period, which included a flagging alert sticker indicating that PVCs placed outside the hospital would require removal within 24 hours. The study found that the rate of PVC-associated SAB was 63% lower during the intervention period compared with the baseline period [19]. Further, a retrospective cohort study of 570 adult patients with a PVC placed in the emergency department found that approximately half were never used [31]. As placement of PVCs before the inpatient setting has been associated with SAB, and these lines are often placed and never used, emergency department policies should investigate the recommendation to place PVCs only when medically necessary. Although not statistically significant, the association between males and SAB is intriguing. A study on the microbiome of humans found that many host factors, including sex, can alter the microbiome of the skin [21, 22]. Additionally, there are physiological and anatomical differences such as sweat, sebum, and hormone production that partially explain the microbial differences on the skin between males and females [21]. We found an incidence density of 0.15 HO PVC–related SAB episodes per 1000 PVC-days, which is more than twice the 0.07/1000 PVC-days reported in a retrospective study of 544 cases of SAB [12]. Although the rate of PVC-associated SAB is low, the prevalence of PVCs used in the inpatient population is high enough to warrant strict adherence to insertion and maintenance best practice by clinical teams, with an emphasis that providers maintain appropriate clinical suspicion to recognize and diagnose PVC-associated SAB. There are several limitations to our study. Given the retrospective nature, we were unable to investigate the frequency of PVC access and ongoing PVC necessity or observe adherence to insertion and maintenance protocols. A single point-prevalence survey was used to estimate the total number of PVC-days during the study period. The mean of several point-prevalence surveys would increase the reliability of these estimates. This study was a single-center experience resulting in a small sample size. Despite these limitations, our results are consistent with previous studies that show that placement of PVCs in the antecubital area and prolonged PVC duration are associated with HO SAB [3, 7, 12, 17, 19]. Avoiding placement of PVCs in the antecubital area and minimizing line duration may reduce the risk of HO PVC–associated SAB. Future prospective and larger studies are warranted to identify and refine other potential risk factors.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Microbial ecology of human skin in health and disease.

Authors:  D N Fredricks
Journal:  J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies.

Authors:  Dennis G Maki; Daniel M Kluger; Christopher J Crnich
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Routine replacement versus clinical monitoring of peripheral intravenous catheters in a regional hospital in the home program: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patricia Van Donk; Claire M Rickard; Matthew R McGrail; Glenn Doolan
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of catheter-related bloodstream infections due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I B Gosbell
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.048

Review 6.  The skin microbiome.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Grice; Julia A Segre
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital.

Authors:  M Pujol; A Hornero; M Saballs; M J Argerich; R Verdaguer; M Cisnal; C Peña; J Ariza; F Gudiol
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indicated resite: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire M Rickard; Damhnat McCann; Jane Munnings; Matthew R McGrail
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Sonya Osborne; Claire Rickard; Jennifer Hall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

10.  Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Samantha Clarke; Dana Paterson; Anne Hutton; Stacey van Dyk; Catherine Gale; Tracey Hopkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-07-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Curious Case of MRSA Bacteremia and Septic Pulmonary Embolism Secondary to Peripheral Venous Catheter.

Authors:  Joshua Twito; Syeda Sahra; Abdullah Jahangir; Neville Mobarakai
Journal:  Case Rep Crit Care       Date:  2021-04-09

2.  Blurred Molecular Epidemiological Lines Between the Two Dominant Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones.

Authors:  Amy C Dupper; Mitchell J Sullivan; Kieran I Chacko; Aaron Mishkin; Brianne Ciferri; Ajay Kumaresh; Ana Berbel Caban; Irina Oussenko; Colleen Beckford; Nathalie E Zeitouni; Robert Sebra; Camille Hamula; Melissa Smith; Andrew Kasarskis; Gopi Patel; Russell B McBride; Harm van Bakel; Deena R Altman
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.835

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.