| Literature DB >> 30949120 |
Angelos Sharobeam1, Dennis John Cordato1,2,3, Nathan Manning2,4,5,6, Andrew Cheung2,4, Jason Wenderoth2,4,5, Cecilia Cappelen-Smith1,2,3.
Abstract
Background: Elderly patients account for 30% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but are under-represented in randomized controlled trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Meta-analysis of "real world" studies evaluating 90-day outcomes in elderly patients ≥80 years have been limited to small numbers undergoing EVT with older generation devices.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; endovascular; outcome; stroke; thrombectomy
Year: 2019 PMID: 30949120 PMCID: PMC6435519 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Baseline characteristics of study cohort.
| Mean ± SD | 85 ± 4 | 64 ± 12 | |
| Range | 80–96 | 29–79 | |
| Female | 39 (55%) | 51 (46%) | 0.24 |
| Male | 32 (45%) | 59 (54%) | 0.24 |
| IV r-tPA | 24 (34%) | 49 (45%) | 0.14 |
| Median (IQR) | 18 (13–24) | 17 (10–22) | |
| Range | 3–42 | 1–28 | |
| M1 | 40 (56%) | 67 (61%) | 0.51 |
| M2 | 12 (17%) | 13 (12%) | 0.35 |
| ICA | 7 (10%) | 18 (16%) | 0.25 |
| Tandem | 12 (17%) | 12 (11%) | 0.25 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 47 (66%) | 43 (39%) | < 0.001 |
| Previous stroke/TIA | 20 (28%) | 18 (16%) | 0.05 |
| Hypertension | 54 (76%) | 70 (64%) | 0.09 |
| Current smoker | 4 (6%) | 30 (28%) | < 0.001 |
| Hypercholesterolaemia | 47 (66%) | 61 (55%) | 0.14 |
| Diabetes | 18 (25%) | 24 (22%) | 0.64 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 26 (37%) | 23 (21%) | 0.02 |
| Onset to groin puncture, median [IQR] | 270 [198–422] | 274 [210–426] | 0.39 |
| Groin puncture to recanalization, median [IQR] | 35 [21–50] | 31 [22–41] | 0.47 |
| Onset to recanalization, median [IQR] | 300 [243–487] | 302 [243–458] | 0.35 |
Significant p-values < 0.05;
borderline significance.
Figure 1(A) Flow chart for study selection into meta-analysis. (B) Elderly vs. young pooled study data showing poorer 90 day outcome and (C) higher mortality in the elderly group.
Outcome measures.
| 0–2 (good outcome) | 20 (28%) | 61 (55%) | OR 0.32 (CI 0.19–0.56), |
| 0 | 4 (6%) | 17 (15%) | |
| 1 | 8 (11%) | 23 (21%) | |
| 2 | 8 (11%) | 21 (19%) | |
| 3–6 (poor outcome) | 51 (72%) | 49 (45%) | |
| 3 | 10 (14%) | 12 (11%) | |
| 4 | 13 (18%) | 13 (12%) | |
| 5 | 9 (13%) | 6 (6%) | |
| 6 | 19 (27%) | 18 (16%) | |
| Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/ TICI 3) | 68 (96%) | 107 (97%) | |
| Symptomatic ICH | 3 (4%) | 5 (5%) | |
mRS, modified Rankin Scale at 90-days; Functional outcome score 0–6: 0, nil deficit; 1, minor deficit; 2, mild deficit; 3, moderate deficit; 4, requires help to walk; 5, bed bound and 6 is death; mTICI, modified Treatment In Cerebral Ischemia; Recanalization classification 0–3: 0, (no flow); 2a < 50% flow in re-opened artery; 2b ≥ 50% flow in re-opened artery and 3 (normal flow). mTICI 2b/3 considered successful recanalization measures.