| Literature DB >> 30949104 |
Xiaoqing Li1,2, Chenrui Hao1,2.
Abstract
Mobile phone has experienced a significant increase in popularity among adolescents in recent years. Findings indicate dependence on mobile phone is related to poor parent-child relationship. However, previous research on mobile phone dependence (MPD) is scant and mainly focus on adult samples. In this view, the present study investigated the association between parental attachment and MPD as well as its influence mechanism, in sample of adolescents in rural China. Data were collected from three middle schools in rural areas of Jiangxi and Hubei Province (N = 693, 46.46% female, M age = 14.88, SD = 1.77). Participants completed the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA), the twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20), the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and the Mobile Phone Addiction Index Scale (MPAI). Among the results, parental attachment negatively predicted MPD and alexithymia were exerting partial mediation effect between parental attachment and MPD. Further, mindfulness acted as moderator of the relationship between alexithymia and MPD: The negative impact of alexithymia on MPD was weakened under the condition of high level of mindfulness. Knowledge of this mechanism could be useful for understanding adolescents' MPD in terms of the interaction of multiple factors.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; alexithymia; mindfulness; mobile phone dependence; parental attachment
Year: 2019 PMID: 30949104 PMCID: PMC6435572 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00598
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1The hypothetical structure model. MPD, mobile phone dependence.
The mean value, standard deviation, and correlation matrix for each variable (N=693).
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.48±0.50 | 1.00 | |||||
| Age | 13.64±1.04 | 0.01 | 1.00 | ||||
| Parental attachment | 1.91±0.65 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1.00 | |||
| Alexithymia | 2.91±0.49 | 0.04 | 0.02 | –0.41** | 1.00 | ||
| Mindfulness | 3.83±0.90 | 0.02 | –0.07 | 0.35** | –0.60** | 1.00 | |
| MPD | 2.57±0.82 | –0.14** | 0.14** | –0.29** | 0.38** | –0.43** | 1.00 |
The moderated mediation model (N=693).
| Outcome Variable | Predictive Variable |
|
|
| β | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexithymia | Parental Attachment | 0.42 | 0.18 | 45.87*** | –0.42 | [–0.49, –0.35] | –11.65*** |
| Gender | 0.07 | [–0.07, 0.21] | 1.04 | ||||
| Age | 0.04 | [–0.02, 0.12] | 1.39 | ||||
| MPD | Parental Attachment | 0.51 | 0.26 | 32.15*** | –0.11 | [–0.18, –0.03] | –2.83** |
| Alexithymia | 0.16 | [0.08, 0.25] | 3.70*** | ||||
| Mindfulness | –0.29 | [–0.38, –0.21] | –6.81*** | ||||
| Alexithymia × Mindfulness | 0.08 | [0.01, 0.15] | 2.33** | ||||
| Parental Attachment × Mindfulness | –0.02 | [–0.09, 0.04] | –0.70 | ||||
| Gender | –0.29 | [–0.42, –0.15] | –4.15*** | ||||
| Age | 0.12 | [0.05, 0.18] | 3.59*** | ||||
The direct effect of parental attachment and mediating effect of alexithymia at two levels of mindfulness.
| The levels of mindfulness | Effect Size | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| direct effect | –0.08 | [–0.18, 0.01] | |
| indirect effect | –0.03 | [–0.09, –0.02] | |
|
| direct effect | –0.11 | [–0.18, –0.03] |
| indirect effect | –0.07 | [–0.11, –0.03] | |
| direct effect | –0.13 | [–0.24, –0.02] | |
| indirect effect | –1.10 | [–0.15, –0.06] | |
FIGURE 2The association between alexithymia and MPD as a function of mindfulness level (low vs. high).