BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypernatremia is common in hospitalized, critically ill patients. Although there are no clear guidelines on sodium correction rate for hypernatremia, some studies suggest a reduction rate not to exceed 0.5 mmol/L per hour. However, the data supporting this recommendation and the optimal rate of hypernatremia correction in hospitalized adults are unclear. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We assessed the association of hypernatremia correction rates with neurologic outcomes and mortality in critically ill patients with hypernatremia at admission and those that developed hypernatremia during hospitalization. We used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III and identified patients with hypernatremia (serum sodium level >155 mmol/L) on admission (n=122) and hospital-acquired (n=327). We calculated different ranges of rapid correction rates (>0.5 mmol/L per hour overall and >8, >10, and >12 mmol/L per 24 hours) and utilized logistic regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to examine association with outcomes. RESULTS: We had complete data on 122 patients with severe hypernatremia on admission and 327 patients who developed hospital-acquired hypernatremia. The difference in in-hospital 30-day mortality proportion between rapid (>0.5 mmol/L per hour) and slower (≤0.5 mmol/L per hour) correction rates were not significant either in patients with hypernatremia at admission with rapid versus slow correction (25% versus 28%; P=0.80) or in patients with hospital-acquired hypernatremia with rapid versus slow correction (44% versus 40%; P=0.50). There was no difference in aOR of mortality for rapid versus slow correction in either admission (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.7) or hospital-acquired hypernatremia (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3). Manual chart review of all suspected chronic hypernatremia patients, which included all 122 with hypernatremia at admission, 128 of the 327 hospital-acquired hypernatremia, and an additional 28 patients with ICD-9 codes for cerebral edema, seizures and/or alteration of consciousness, did not reveal a single case of cerebral edema attributable to rapid hyprnatremia correction. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any evidence that rapid correction of hypernatremia is associated with a higher risk for mortality, seizure, alteration of consciousness, and/or cerebral edema in critically ill adult patients with either admission or hospital-acquired hypernatremia.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Hypernatremia is common in hospitalized, critically illpatients. Although there are no clear guidelines on sodium correction rate for hypernatremia, some studies suggest a reduction rate not to exceed 0.5 mmol/L per hour. However, the data supporting this recommendation and the optimal rate of hypernatremia correction in hospitalized adults are unclear. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We assessed the association of hypernatremia correction rates with neurologic outcomes and mortality in critically illpatients with hypernatremia at admission and those that developed hypernatremia during hospitalization. We used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III and identified patients with hypernatremia (serum sodium level >155 mmol/L) on admission (n=122) and hospital-acquired (n=327). We calculated different ranges of rapid correction rates (>0.5 mmol/L per hour overall and >8, >10, and >12 mmol/L per 24 hours) and utilized logistic regression to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to examine association with outcomes. RESULTS: We had complete data on 122 patients with severe hypernatremia on admission and 327 patients who developed hospital-acquired hypernatremia. The difference in in-hospital 30-day mortality proportion between rapid (>0.5 mmol/L per hour) and slower (≤0.5 mmol/L per hour) correction rates were not significant either in patients with hypernatremia at admission with rapid versus slow correction (25% versus 28%; P=0.80) or in patients with hospital-acquired hypernatremia with rapid versus slow correction (44% versus 40%; P=0.50). There was no difference in aOR of mortality for rapid versus slow correction in either admission (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.7) or hospital-acquired hypernatremia (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3). Manual chart review of all suspected chronic hypernatremiapatients, which included all 122 with hypernatremia at admission, 128 of the 327 hospital-acquired hypernatremia, and an additional 28 patients with ICD-9 codes for cerebral edema, seizures and/or alteration of consciousness, did not reveal a single case of cerebral edema attributable to rapid hyprnatremia correction. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any evidence that rapid correction of hypernatremia is associated with a higher risk for mortality, seizure, alteration of consciousness, and/or cerebral edema in critically ill adultpatients with either admission or hospital-acquired hypernatremia.
Authors: Georg-Christian Funk; Gregor Lindner; Wilfred Druml; Barbara Metnitz; Christoph Schwarz; Peter Bauer; Philipp G H Metnitz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-10-22 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Alistair E W Johnson; Tom J Pollard; Lu Shen; Li-Wei H Lehman; Mengling Feng; Mohammad Ghassemi; Benjamin Moody; Peter Szolovits; Leo Anthony Celi; Roger G Mark Journal: Sci Data Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum; Mervyn Kyi; Christopher Wright; Tony Goldschlager; R Andrew Danks; W Geoffrey Parkin Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-01-03 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Jonathan S Chávez-Íñiguez; Pablo Maggiani-Aguilera; Helbert Rondon-Berrios; Kianoush B Kashani; Christian Pérez-Flores; Jorge Michel-González; Andres E De la Torre-Quiroga; Andrea Luna-Ramos; Guillermo Navarro-Blackaller; Alexia Romero-Muñoz; Ana T Martínez-Navarro; Gael Chávez-Alonso; Ramón Medina-González; Guillermo García-García Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Markus Harboe Olsen; Marcus Møller; Stefano Romano; Jonas Andersson; Eric Mlodzinski; Nathan H Raines; Raphael Sherak; Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2020-12-16
Authors: Todd S Ing; Kavitha Ganta; Gautam Bhave; Susie Q Lew; Emmanuel I Agaba; Christos Argyropoulos; Antonios H Tzamaloukas Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2020-08-25