Literature DB >> 30948241

Sacral skin blood flow response to alternating pressure operating room overlay.

Patricia Karg1, Vinoth K Ranganathan2, Michael Churilla3, David Brienza3.   

Abstract

Pressure injuries resulting from long surgeries may be caused by prolonged ischemia. Operating table surfaces with alternating pressure (AP) features may reduce the risk of ischemia-induced pressure injuries by providing periodic relief of blood flow occlusions. Prior research investigated alternating loading applied with a single isolated rigid indenter and demonstrated increased perfusion. This study quantified effects of an overlay with AP on sacral skin perfusion for individuals lying supine for 60-min while blood flow was monitored. The mean normalized sacral skin blood flow was found to be greater with the AP overlay over an operating table pad compared to the operating pad alone (pad with AP mean SBF = 1.45 ± 1.16, pad without AP mean SBF = 1.03 ± 0.46, p = 0.10). Peak and average interface pressure at the sacrum was significantly lower during the deflation cycle of the AP surface compared to the operating pad alone (P < 0.001), suggesting this periodic reduction resulted in higher mean blood flow. Post-hoc regression analysis showed participant body mass index was a significant predictor of the effectiveness of the AP overlay (p = 0.012). The results suggest risk for pressure injuries due to prolonged ischemia might be mitigated by the addition of an alternating pressure feature on operating table pads for lower BMI patients.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternating pressure; Operating table; Pressure injury; Pressure ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30948241     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  4 in total

1.  Critical biomechanical and clinical insights concerning tissue protection when positioning patients in the operating room: A scoping review.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Sue Creehan; Joyce Black
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Convergent Validity of Three Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scales: Comparing the PPRA-Home (Pressure Injury Primary Risk Assessment Scale for Home Care) to Two Traditional Scales.

Authors:  Masushi Kohta; Takehiko Ohura; Katsuyuki Okada; Yoshinori Nakamura; Eiko Kumagai; Hitomi Kataoka; Tomomi Kitagawa; Yuki Kameda; Toshihiro Kitte
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-02-02

3.  Pressure Injury Prevention for Complex Cardiovascular Patients in the Operating Room and Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

Authors:  Joyce Pittman; Dawn Horvath; Terrie Beeson; Karrie Bailey; Annie Mills; Laura Kaiser; Deborah K Hall; Jennifer Sweeney
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 1.970

4.  Support surfaces for intraoperative pressure injury prevention: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolina Beatriz Cunha Prado; Elaine Alves Silva Machado; Karina Dal Sasso Mendes; Renata Cristina de Campos Pereira Silveira; Cristina Maria Galvão
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2021-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.