Literature DB >> 30947940

Outcomes Following Subclavian and Axillary Artery Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Society of the Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry Report.

Thom G Dahle1, Tsuyoshi Kaneko2, James M McCabe3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency and outcomes of patients who underwent transsubclavian or transaxillary (TAx) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 prosthesis compared with traditional alternative access, transapical (TA) and transaortic (TAo).
BACKGROUND: The transsubclavian and TAx approaches for TAVR are rapidly growing alternatives in the setting of hostile iliofemoral arteries, yet few data exist.
METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry was queried for all patients undergoing TAx TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis from June 2015 to February 2018. Secular trends over time were evaluated. Logistic regression analyses used to assess risk-adjusted outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare TAx access with TA and TAo access.
RESULTS: In total, 3,628 patients (5.7%) underwent nontransfemoral access with the SAPIEN 3. Overall, TAx TAVR accounted for 1,249 of these patients (34.4%). There has been rapid recent growth in TAx TAVR (from 20.2% in the third quarter of 2015 to 49.0% in the fourth quarter of 2017; p < 0.001 for trend) and a concomitant decrease in TA and TAo access (from 61.9% in the third quarter of 2015 to 35.3% in the fourth quarter of 2017; p < 0.001 for trend). The median number of TAx TAVR cases per hospital during the study period was 2, and 78.2% of centers performed ≤5 TAx TAVR procedures. The device success rate was 97.3%, and the major vascular complication rate was 2.5%. After propensity matching, TAx access had lower 30-day mortality (5.3% vs. 8.4%; p < 0.01), shorter lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stay, but a higher stroke rate (6.3% vs. 3.1%; p < 0.05) compared with TA and TAo access.
CONCLUSIONS: TAx access has become the most frequent alternative access route for balloon-expandable TAVR procedures. Outcomes following TAx TAVR appear positive despite the relatively early experience of most centers performing these cases.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SAPIEN; TAVR; alternative access; aortic; apical; axillary; replacement; stenosis; subclavian; transcatheter; valve

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30947940     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  18 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a focus on transcarotid: a review of the current literature.

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Joel Raja; Mahmoud Bayoumi; Theodore Manolukas; Rami N Khouzam; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  Evolving Indications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Going.

Authors:  Jules Mesnier; Vassili Panagides; Jorge Nuche; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdallah El Sabbagh; Mohammed Al-Hijji; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Transcaval Versus Transaxillary TAVR in Contemporary Practice: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis.

Authors:  Robert J Lederman; Vasilis C Babaliaros; John C Lisko; Toby Rogers; Paul Mahoney; Jason R Foerst; Jeremiah P Depta; Kamran I Muhammad; James M McCabe; Andrei Pop; Jaffar M Khan; Christopher G Bruce; Giorgio A Medranda; Jane W Wei; Jose N Binongo; Adam B Greenbaum
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.075

Review 5.  Transcaval Access for Large Bore Devices.

Authors:  Marvin H Eng; Pedro Villablanca; Tiberio Frisoli; Adam B Greenbaum; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Direct aortic route versus transaxillary route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-An Lee; I-Li Su; Shao-Wei Chen; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Dong-Yi Chen; Pao-Hsien Chu; An-Hsun Chou; Yu-Ting Cheng; Pyng-Jing Lin; Feng-Chun Tsai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Catheter strategy to ease the procedure and reduce radiation exposure when requiring neck access.

Authors:  Rouven Kubicki; Johanna Hummel; René Höhn; Kevin Müller; Brigitte Stiller; Jochen Grohmann
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-06

Review 8.  Emerging Role of Large-bore Percutaneous Axillary Vascular Access: A Step-by-step Guide.

Authors:  Kathryn Dawson; Tara L Jones; Kathleen E Kearney; James M McCabe
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-15

9.  Safety and efficacy of transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a current-generation balloon-expandable valve.

Authors:  Yong Zhan; Nicholas Toomey; Jamel Ortoleva; Masashi Kawabori; Andrew Weintraub; Frederick Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Femoral Versus Nonfemoral Subclavian/Carotid Arterial Access Route for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Laurent Faroux; Lucia Junquera; Siamak Mohammadi; David Del Val; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Alberto Alperi; Dimitri Kalavrouziotis; Eric Dumont; Jean-Michel Paradis; Robert Delarochellière; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.