Sidney Zisook1, Gary R Johnson1, Ilanit Tal1, Paul Hicks1, Peijun Chen1, Lori Davis1, Michael Thase1, Yinjun Zhao1, Julia Vertrees1, Somaia Mohamed1. 1. VA San Diego Healthcare System (Zisook, Tal); the Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego (Zisook); Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven (Johnson, Zhao); the Department of Psychiatry, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Temple (Hicks); Louis Stokes VA Medical Center and the Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland (Chen); Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Ala. (Davis); University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (Davis); Philadelphia VA Medical Center (Thase); Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Pharmacy Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, N.Mex. (Vertrees); and the VA New England Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven (Mohamed).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Almost two-thirds of patients with major depressive disorder do not achieve remission with initial treatments. Thus, identifying and providing effective, feasible, and safe "next-step" treatments are clinical imperatives. This study explores patient baseline features that might help clinicians select between commonly used next-step treatments. METHODS: The authors used data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) study, a multisite, randomized, single-blind trial of 1,522 Veterans Health Administration patients who did not have an adequate response to at least one course of antidepressant treatment meeting minimal standards for dosage and duration. For 12 weeks, participants received one of three possible next-step treatments: switch to another antidepressant-sustained-release bupropion; combination with another antidepressant-sustained-release bupropion; or augmentation with an antipsychotic-aripiprazole. Life table regression models were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with remission overall (general predictors) and their interaction with remission among the three treatment groups (moderators). RESULTS:Remission was more likely for individuals who were employed, less severely and chronically depressed, less anxious, not experiencing complicated grief symptoms, did not experience childhood adversity, and had better quality of life and positive mental health. Two features suggested specific next-step treatment selections: age ≥65 years (for whom augmentation with aripiprazole was more effective than switch to bupropion) and severe mixed hypomanic symptoms (for which augmentation with aripiprazole and combination with bupropion were more effective than switch to bupropion). CONCLUSIONS: If replicated, these preliminary findings could help clinicians determine which patients with depression requiring next-step treatment will benefit most from a specific augmentation, combination, or switching strategy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Almost two-thirds of patients with major depressive disorder do not achieve remission with initial treatments. Thus, identifying and providing effective, feasible, and safe "next-step" treatments are clinical imperatives. This study explores patient baseline features that might help clinicians select between commonly used next-step treatments. METHODS: The authors used data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Augmentation and Switching Treatments for Improving Depression Outcomes (VAST-D) study, a multisite, randomized, single-blind trial of 1,522 Veterans Health Administration patients who did not have an adequate response to at least one course of antidepressant treatment meeting minimal standards for dosage and duration. For 12 weeks, participants received one of three possible next-step treatments: switch to another antidepressant-sustained-release bupropion; combination with another antidepressant-sustained-release bupropion; or augmentation with an antipsychotic-aripiprazole. Life table regression models were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with remission overall (general predictors) and their interaction with remission among the three treatment groups (moderators). RESULTS: Remission was more likely for individuals who were employed, less severely and chronically depressed, less anxious, not experiencing complicated grief symptoms, did not experience childhood adversity, and had better quality of life and positive mental health. Two features suggested specific next-step treatment selections: age ≥65 years (for whom augmentation with aripiprazole was more effective than switch to bupropion) and severe mixed hypomanic symptoms (for which augmentation with aripiprazole and combination with bupropion were more effective than switch to bupropion). CONCLUSIONS: If replicated, these preliminary findings could help clinicians determine which patients with depression requiring next-step treatment will benefit most from a specific augmentation, combination, or switching strategy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antidepressants; Major Depressive Disorder; Mood Disorders–Unipolar; Treatment-Resistant Depression
Authors: Alisson P Trevizol; Jonathan Downar; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez; Kevin E Thorpe; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-04-30
Authors: Martin Kocur; Martin Dechant; Christian Wolff; Caroline Nothdurfter; Thomas C Wetter; Rainer Rupprecht; Youssef Shiban Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 4.157