| Literature DB >> 30947272 |
Tomris Mustafa1,2, Qun Li1,2, Lauren E Kelly1,2, Anne Gibbon3, Irwin Ryan3, Keisha Roffey3, Stephanie Simonds1,2, Michael A Cowley1,2, Mark W Sleeman1,2.
Abstract
Experimental non-human primate models of obesity are induced through the introduction of atypically calorically rich diets. Studies in captive-bred macaques show the development of obesity and diabetes with similar complications to humans including eye and kidney diseases, nerve damage associated with pain and blood vessel damage. Diets differ in outcomes and here we document inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that can be exacerbated through these dietary interventions. Following baseline physiological evaluation of body composition, Southern pigtail macaques were given a high-fat diet (HFD) for three months. This HFD consisted of lard, grains (including gluten), dairy and fructose that was otherwise omitted from a standard macaque diet (Chow). Physiological parameters were then reassessed before animals were reverted back to standard Chow for a further three months (remission). Consumption of the HFD resulted in food-mediated hypersensitivity marked by chronic weight loss, alopecia, malabsorption, protein-losing enteropathy and gross diffuse intestinal villi atrophy and lamina propria hypertrophy. Physiological changes were more highly pronounced in female macaques suggesting sex-specific differences but could be fully reversed through change of diet. Care should be taken in choosing non-human primate HFD diets for creating experimental models of obesity because they can induce severe food-driven chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that can eventuate to diet-induced chronic wasting and mortality.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30947272 PMCID: PMC6448857 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214621
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The source, formulation and calculated nutritional parameters of the standard primate diet (Chow) and custom high-fat diet (HFD) compared to the Typical American diet (TAD) primate diet.
| Gordons Specialty Feeds | Specialty Feeds | ||
| Custom Diet | Custom Diet | ||
| Protein | 21 | Protein | 12 |
| Total Fat | 8 | Total Fat | 13 |
| Fructose | - | Fructose | 5.54 |
| Crude Fibre | 5.3 | Crude Fibre | 13.7 |
| Acid Detergent Fibre | 4.6 | Acid Detergent Fibre | 4.3 |
| Digestible Energy | 13 Mj/kg | Digestible Energy | 14.6 Mj/kg |
| Corn, sorghum, rice, lupins, soy protein, coconut meal, dried milk products, molasses, vegetable oil, sugar beet pulp, yeast, calcium carbonate, salt, vitamin and mineral premix, vitamin C (stabilised), vitamin E and vitamin D3. | Wheat, mill mix (bran and pollard), skim milk, sucrose, beef tallow, canola oil, guar gum, fructose, maize, cellulose, fish oil, casein, lard, calcium carbonate, salt, sulphur, vitamin C, potassium chloride, vitamin/mineral mix. | ||
Summary of all female pigtail macaques used in the studies and diet-induced weight changes.
Data presents the total % change in body weight of individuals from baseline following consumption of the HFD or Chow for 3 months (0–3 months). HFD animals were then switched back to consuming Chow for 3 months (3–6 months) while the control Chow animals continued to consume the Chow and the % change in body weight from 3 months was determined at the end of the remission period. † - Female animals that reached experimental endpoint during the studies and were removed from the study based on ethical guidelines.
| Pigtail Macaques | Age | Diet/ Group | % Weight | % Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | Chow-1 | 0.00 | -10.81 | |
| 7.8 | Chow -2 | 0.00 | 0.77 | |
| 6.7 | Chow -3 | 0.00 | 2.24 | |
| 7.3 | Chow -4 | -6.85 | 39.12 | |
| 8.7 | Chow -5 | 6.90 | -2.26 | |
| 6.3 | Chow-6 | -4.76 | ||
| 8.2 | Chow -7 | -6.10 | 3.25 | |
| 7.2 | Chow -8 | -6.94 | 6.57 | |
| 5.9 | Chow -9 | 10.17 | -8.92 | |
| 7.6 | Chow -10 | -11.39 | 7.43 | |
| 13.7 | HFD -2 | -10.66 | 5.20 | |
| 14.2 | HFD -5 | -14.00 | 18.31 | |
| 7.7 | HFD—6 | -9.01 | 28.90 | |
| 8.5 | HFD -7 | -3.28 | 10.51 | |
| 8.4 | HFD -8 | -7.81 | 1.69 | |
| 8.2 | HFD -9 | -14.47 | 18.77 | |
| 12.1 | HFD -10 | -16.05 | 12.94 | |
† Female macaques that reached an experimental endpoint and were euthanised as part of the study.
*Female macaques removed from the study due to unrelated causes.
Fig 1HFD consumption for 3 months resulted in significant weight loss in female macaques that was not evident in male macaques.
Weights of female (A) and male (C) macaques was determined at baseline and prior to being placed on a custom HFD, while control counterparts remained on CHOW for 3 months. HFD animals were then reverted back to consuming the CHOW for three months (3-6months) and compared to CHOW-fed animals at the end of this remission period. Total % body fat composition of female (B) and male macaques (D) was examined using a DEXA at baseline, 3 months following consumption of HFD or CHOW (0–3 months) and at the end of the remission period (3–6 months). The difference in % change in total body weight and fat composition between HFD and CHOW at 0–3 and 3–6 was determined using unpaired student t-tests. **p<0.01, *p<0.05. Values are means ± SEM.
Summary of all male pigtail macaques used in the studies and diet-induced weight changes.
Data presents the total % change in body weight of individuals from baseline following consumption of the HFD or CHOW for 3 months (0–3 months). HFD animals were then switched back to consuming CHOW for 3 months (3–6 months) while the control CHOW animals continued to consume the CHOW and the % change in body weight from 3 months was determined at the end of the remission period.
| Pigtail Macaques | Age | Diet/ Group | % Weight | % Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Chow-1 | 2.73 | -2.09 | |
| 8.6 | Chow -2 | -1.30 | -1.17 | |
| 6.5 | Chow -3 | 3.33 | 8.89 | |
| 17 | Chow -4 | 2.25 | 5.39 | |
| 10.2 | Chow -5 | 1.54 | -4.00 | |
| 4 | Chow-6 | 6.25 | 44.17 | |
| 6.4 | Chow -7 | 8.91 | 2.97 | |
| 4.5 | Chow -8 | 5.36 | 16.79 | |
| 4.6 | Chow -9 | 17.86 | ||
| 4.5 | Chow -10 | 21.82 | 23.27 | |
| HFD -1 | ||||
| 6.3 | HFD -2 | 1.11 | 17.25 | |
| HFD -3 | ||||
| HFD -4 | ||||
| 6.8 | HFD -5 | 5.05 | 7.69 | |
| 7.4 | HFD—6 | 20.69 | ||
| 18.4 | HFD -7 | -4.12 | 15.81 | |
| 3.9 | HFD -8 | 19.51 | 27.55 | |
| 7.7 | HFD -9 | -11.76 | 26.67 | |
| 8.5 | HFD -10 | -10.19 | 4.87 | |
* Male macaques removed from the study due to unrelated causes.
Fig 2HFD-induced histopathological changes in female macaques indicating severe inflammation throughout the GIT.
Representative sections of inflamed mucosa in the stomach, small intestine and colon of HFD-fed female macaques (lower panel) compared to control Chow counterparts. Consumption of the HFD resulted in thickening and immune cell, mainly lymphocyte, infiltration of the laminia propria while the muscularis mucosae and submucosa remained largely intact. The intestinal villi were flat as a result of immune cell infiltration. L: Lumen; E: epithelium; LP: Lamina propria; MM: muscularis mucosae; SM: submucosa; V: villi.
Fig 3HFD-induced eosinophils infiltration of the small intestine mucosa of female animals.
(A). Representative sections of both normal chow-fed (a, c) and inflamed HFD-fed (b, d) small intestine mucosae respectively showing the infiltration of eosinophils. High power magnification showed clustered eosinophils at the basal zone of mucosae in inflamed tissue (d), compared with the scattered distribution of eosinophils in Chow-fed animals (c). (B). Quantification and comparison of eosinophil numbers between Chow and HFD small intestine and colon. Values are means ± SEM. *P<0.05. L: Lumen; E: epithelium; LP: Lamina propria; MM: muscularis mucosae; V: villi.
Fig 4Diet-induced intra- and extra- epithelial CD3+ immunoreactivity in the gastrointestinal tract of female animals.
(A). Immunohistochemical analysis of CD3-ir (immunoreactivity) in representational sections of stomach, small intestine and colon obtained from Chow and HFD-fed animals. (B). Magnification of villi of inflamed small intestine obtained from HFD animals showed increases in CD3 immunoreactive T cells (CD3-ir) that was not restricted to only epithelial cells of small intestine and was also found in lamina propria. (C). Comparison of the amount of CD3-ir intra-epithelial T cells in the small intestine and colon of Chow vs HFD groups. Values are means ± SEM. *P<0.05. L: Lumen; E: epithelium; LP: Lamina propria. The rectangle box indicated the part of epithelium where epithelial cells (arrow) and CD3-ir T cells (arrowhead) was counted.
Fig 5(A) Changes in gastrointestinal CD11C-immunoreactivity in response to diet-induced inflammation. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD11C, a marker of dendritic cells in addition to monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils and nature killer cells in representational sections of stomach, small intestine and colon of CHOW (top panel) or HFD (lower panel) counterstained with Hematoxylin from female macaques. B. Increased CD68 immunoreactivity throughout the gastrointestinal tract of HFD-fed animals. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD68, a marker of macrophages in representational sections of stomach, small intestine and colon of Chow (top panel) or HFD (lower panel) fed female animals counterstained with Hematoxylin from female macaques.
Fig 6A. Recruitment of CD56 immunoreactive cells to the gastrointestinal tract in response to HFD in female animals. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD56, a marker for natural killer cells, T cell subtypes and monocytes in representational sections of stomach, small intestine and colon of Chow- (top panel) or HFD- (lower panel) fed female animals counterstained with Hematoxylin. B. Dietary manipulations did not alter recruitment of CD8 immunoreactive cells to the gastrointestinal tract of female macaques. Immunohistochemical analysis of CD8, a marker of cytotoxic T cells in representational sections of stomach, small intestine and colon obtained from Chow-(top panel) or HFD- (lower panel) fed animals counterstained with Hematoxylin from female macaques.