Literature DB >> 30946858

Trends in colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use after the introduction of dual screening offers in Germany: Results from a large population-based study, 2003-2016.

Chen Chen1, Christian Stock2, Lina Jansen2, Jenny Chang-Claude3, Michael Hoffmeister2, Hermann Brenner4.   

Abstract

An increasing number of countries have recently introduced colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. Typically, one specific screening exam, such as fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or flexible sigmoidoscopy, is offered as a primary screening test. We aimed to assess trends in FOBT and colonoscopy use in Germany following the introduction of the offer of screening colonoscopy as an alternative to FOBT in 2002. We used data from 4052 control participants aged 50-79 years recruited during 2003-2016 for a population-based case-control study in Germany. Prevalence of FOBT and colonoscopy lifetime and recent use was analyzed and trends over time were examined. The percentage of all respondents who had ever undergone a colonoscopy (for either screening or diagnostic purpose) increased markedly over time from 44.6% in 2003-2005 to 57.5% in 2013-2016 (p < 0.0001). Large increases were also observed for colonoscopy use within 10 years (from 38.0% to 52.8%, p < 0.0001), whereas FOBT uptake within one to two years declined from 54.0% to 33.3%. By 2013-2016, 67.2% of respondents either had an FOBT within one to two years or a colonoscopy within 10 years, and this percentage had remained relatively stable over time. This study demonstrates a large increase in colonoscopy utilization since colonoscopy was included as an alternative primary screening test, which was accompanied by a substantial decline in FOBT use. Although the overall adherence to CRC screening recommendations remained stable, the substantial shift of share from FOBT to colonoscopy is expected to yield more protection against CRC incidence and mortality.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Fecal occult blood test; Health policy; Population-based; Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30946858     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  5 in total

1.  Change in colorectal cancer (CRC) testing rates associated with the introduction of the first organized screening program in canton Uri, Switzerland: Evidence from insurance claims data analyses from 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sarah Bissig; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; Rémi Schneider; Kali Tal; Kevin Selby; Cinzia Del Giovane; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Oliver Senn; Cyril Ducros; Christian P R Schmid; Urs Marbet; Reto Auer
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Impact of demographic changes and screening colonoscopy on long-term projection of incident colorectal cancer cases in Germany: A modelling study.

Authors:  Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hanna Tillmanns; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Colorectal Cancer in Northern Tanzania: Increasing Trends and Late Presentation Present Major Challenges.

Authors:  Ayesiga M Herman; Alexander T Hawkins; Kennedy Misso; Christian Issangya; Murad Tarmohamed; Alex Mremi; Furaha Serventi; David Msuya; Rune Philemon
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-03

4.  Incidence and Mortality of Proximal and Distal Colorectal Cancer in Germany—Trends in the Era of Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Rafael Cardoso; Anna Zhu; Feng Guo; Thomas Heisser; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Evaluation of Blood Stool Test Utilization for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Georgia, USA.

Authors:  Benjamin E Ansa; Nicollette Lewis; Zachary Hoffman; Biplab Datta; J Aaron Johnson
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.