Literature DB >> 30946497

Transfusion Camp: a prospective evaluation of a transfusion education program for multispecialty postgraduate trainees.

Yulia Lin1,2,3,4, Everad Tilokee3,5, Sophie Chargé3,5, Asim Alam3,6, Christine Cserti-Gazdewich2,3,4,7, Wendy Lau2,3,4,8, Christie Lee3,9, Lani Lieberman1,2,3,4,7, Paula Nixon2,3, Wendy Owens3,10, Katerina Pavenski2,3,4,11, Jacob Pendergrast2,3,4,7, Elianna Saidenberg3,12, Nadine Shehata2,3,4,13, Robert Skeate2,3,4,5, Qi-Long Yi5, David Conrad14, Jill Dudebout15, Cyrus C Hsia16, Michael Murphy17, Oksana Prokopchuk-Gauk18, Akshay Shah17, Ziad Solh16, Jacqueline Trudeau19, Michelle P Zeller20,21, Jeannie Callum1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal method of providing transfusion medicine (TM) education has not been determined. Transfusion Camp was established in 2012 at the University of Toronto as a centrally delivered TM education program for postgraduate trainees. The impact of Transfusion Camp on knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behavior was evaluated.
METHODS: Didactic lectures (delivered locally, by webinar, or recorded) and locally facilitated team-based learning seminars were delivered over 5 days during the academic year to 8 sites: 7 in Canada and 1 in the United Kingdom. Knowledge assessment using a validated 20-question multiple-choice exam was conducted before and after Transfusion Camp. Attitudes and self-reported behavior were collected through a survey.
RESULTS: Over 2 academic years (July 2016 to June 2018), 390 trainees from 16 different specialties (predominantly anesthesia, 41%; hematology, 14%; and critical care, 7%) attended at least 1 day of Transfusion Camp. The mean pretest score was 10.3 of 20 (±2.9; n = 286) compared with posttest score of 13.0 (±2.8; n = 194; p < 0.0001). Lower pretest score and greater attendance (4-5 days compared with 1-3 days) were associated with larger improvement in posttest score; delivery format, specialty, and postgraduate year were not. Trainees reported an improvement in self-rated abilities to manage TM scenarios; 95% rated TM knowledge as very or extremely important in providing patient care; and 81% indicated that they had applied learning from Transfusion Camp into clinical practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion Camp increased TM knowledge, fostered a positive attitude toward TM, and enabled a self-reported positive impact on transfusion practice in postgraduate trainees. It is a novel and scalable approach to delivering TM education.
© 2019 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30946497     DOI: 10.1111/trf.15284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  1 in total

1.  Transfusion medicine and blood banking education and training for blood establishment laboratory staff: A review of selected countries in Africa.

Authors:  Vanitha Rambiritch; Marion Vermeulen; Hazel Bell; Patricia Knox; Elena Nedelcu; Arwa Z Al-Riyami; Jeannie Callum; Karin van den Berg
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.337

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.