Literature DB >> 30946261

Effect of Interset Strategies on Acute Resistance Training Performance and Physiological Responses: A Systematic Review.

Christopher Latella1, Jozo Grgic2, Dan Van der Westhuizen3.   

Abstract

Latella, C, Grgic, J, and Van der Westhuizen, D. Effect of interset strategies on acute resistance training performance and physiological responses: a systematic review. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence surrounding the implementation of interset strategies to optimize acute resistance training performance. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were conducted. Studies that met the following criteria were included: (a) compared an interset strategy with a traditional passive rest interval in resistance training, (b) the assessed outcomes included performance or physiological responses, (c) resistance training was performed in a traditional dynamic fashion, (d) the study had an acute design, and (e) was published in English and in a peer-reviewed journal. A total of 26 studies were included in the review. When a given interset strategy was used, several studies reported improvements in the number of performed repetitions (i.e., greater total volume load), attenuation of the loss in velocity and power, reduced lactate levels, and in some cases, a decrease in perceived exertion. Dynamic agonist/static antagonist stretching, cooling, aerobic exercise, vibration, and individualized heart rate-based intervals seem to be the most effective strategies. However, the heterogeneity between study designs and methodologies suggests that careful consideration should be given to the type and specific application of the interset method being used. Given the acute nature of studies, extrapolation to any long-term benefits of using a given interset strategy remains limited. Collectively, coaches and sports scientists may consider using the most effective strategies based on practicality and equipment availability to optimize performance during the resistance training component of strength and conditioning programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30946261     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  2 in total

1.  Total Training Volume and Muscle Soreness Parameters Performing Agonist or Antagonist Foam Rolling between Sets.

Authors:  Haroldo Gualter Santana; Bruno Lara; Filipe Canuto Almeida da Silva; Pedro Medina Eiras; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Jeffrey M Willardson; Humberto Miranda
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 2.  Appropriate Reporting of Exercise Variables in Resistance Training Protocols: Much more than Load and Number of Repetitions.

Authors:  Giuseppe Coratella
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-07-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.