Literature DB >> 30946228

Low-Cost Desktop-Based Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Craniofacial Models in Surgical Counseling, Consent Taking, and Education of Parent of Craniosynostosis Patients: A Comparison With Conventional Visual Explanation Modalities.

Feras Alshomer1, Faisal AlFaqeeh1, Mohammed Alariefy2, Ikhlass Altweijri3, Taghreed Alhumsi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is a complex craniofacial deformity. Surgical decision, if needed, is always hard on the parent and requires the use of multimodalities of explanation. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no studies tackling family counseling about the deformity and surgical decision-making process with the use of low-cost patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed models.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study investigating the utility of patient-specific 3D-printed models using a desktop-based 3D printer. Questionnaire was constructed and validated screening the demographics, knowledge, expectation, and surgical decision-making process supplied using Likert. Data were collected consecutively from each parent first after explanation with conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) images, and then repeated after the 3D-printed model has been presented.
RESULTS: Fourteen parents were screened. Majority of parents considered the pathology to have a potential effect of child's functional and aesthetic outcomes. After using the 3D-printed models, the participants had a clear vision and needed not to read any more about the condition (P = 0.05, P = 0.019, respectively). Agreement for surgical management was in favor of the 3D-printed models compared with CT images (P = 0.028). Explanation with CT images yielded higher mean score in knowledge about potential complications compared with 3D models (P value = 0.007). For the 3D models, average printing time was 26 hours, and a mean cost of 5.2$.
CONCLUSION: The utility of desktop 3D printing is an affordable modality to provide adequate information about craniosynostosis and can assist surgical decision-making. Knowledge and adaptation of such cheap technology represents a great skill aiding clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30946228     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional printing and craniosynostosis surgery.

Authors:  Sauson Soldozy; Kaan Yağmurlu; Daniel K Akyeampong; Rebecca Burke; Peter F Morgenstern; Robert F Keating; Jonathan S Black; John A Jane; Hasan R Syed
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Clinical and Genetic Characterization of Craniosynostosis in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Malak Alghamdi; Taghreed R Alhumsi; Ikhlass Altweijri; Waleed H Alkhamis; Omar Barasain; Kelly J Cardona-Londoño; Reshmi Ramakrishnan; Francisco J Guzmán-Vega; Stefan T Arold; Ghaida Ali; Nouran Adly; Hebatallah Ali; Ahmed Basudan; Muhammed A Bakhrebah
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  3D pelvic cadaver model: a novel approach to surgical training for penile implant surgery.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Ahmed Ghazi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 4.  Low-Cost Cranioplasty-A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine.

Authors:  Wojciech Czyżewski; Jakub Jachimczyk; Zofia Hoffman; Michał Szymoniuk; Jakub Litak; Marcin Maciejewski; Krzysztof Kura; Radosław Rola; Kamil Torres
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.748

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.