Literature DB >> 30945330

Prognostic value of minimal residual disease and polyclonal plasma cells in myeloma patients achieving a complete response to therapy.

Marcella A Tschautscher1, Dragan Jevremovic2, Vincent Rajkumar3, Angela Dispenzieri3, Martha Q Lacy3, Morie A Gertz3, Francis K Buadi3, David Dingli3, Yi L Hwa3, Amie L Fonder3, Miriam A Hobbs3, Suzanne R Hayman3, Steven R Zeldenrust3, John A Lust3, Stephen J Russell4, Nelson Leung5, Prashant Kapoor3, Ronald S Go3, Yi Lin3, Wilson I Gonsalves3, Taxiarchis Kourelis3, Rahma Warsame3, Robert A Kyle3, Shaji K Kumar3.   

Abstract

Achievement of a complete response has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Recently, increasing application of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment has shown that MRD negativity is a powerful prognostic factor for survival outcomes. We wanted to examine the impact of the polyclonal plasma cell (pPC) compartment among patients in complete response (CR) but are MRD positive. This is a retrospective cohort study where 460 myeloma patients were identified who met criteria for CR and had multicolor flow cytometry performed on the bone marrow (BM). Monoclonal and pPCs were estimated during MRD testing. Final outcomes including overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were compared among the groups. The median OS for the entire cohort was not reached (95% CI; 63 mos, NR) and the median TTNT was 31 months (95% CI; 27,36). Among the MRDneg group, median TTNT was 37.6 months vs 23 months for MRDpos patients (P < .001); the median OS was not reached for either group, but there was a trend toward better survival for MRDneg patients. Among the MRDpos group, median percentage of pPCs was 65% (2.5-98.5), and those with >95% pPCs had a significantly better TTNT (NR vs 23 months; P = .02) and a trend toward better OS. We conclude that achievement of MRD negativity predicts for better response durability and trend toward improved OS and an increased proportion of pPC predicts for better outcomes within those who have residual tumor cells highlighting the importance of marrow normalization.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30945330     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  5 in total

Review 1.  Review of Multiple Myeloma Genetics including Effects on Prognosis, Response to Treatment, and Diagnostic Workup.

Authors:  Julia Erin Wiedmeier-Nutor; Peter Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Alessandra Romano; Giuseppe Alberto Palumbo; Nunziatina Laura Parrinello; Concetta Conticello; Marina Martello; Carolina Terragna
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Personalized immunoglobulin aptamers for detection of multiple myeloma minimal residual disease in serum.

Authors:  Claudia Tapia-Alveal; Timothy R Olsen; Tilla S Worgall
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 4.  Label-Free Enrichment of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells: Future Potential Applications of Dielectrophoresis in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Nicolò Musso; Alessandra Romano; Paolo Giuseppe Bonacci; Grazia Scandura; Clarissa Pandino; Massimo Camarda; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Francesco Di Raimondo; Emma Cacciola; Rossella Cacciola
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Utility of repeating bone marrow biopsy for confirmation of complete response in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marcella A Tschautscher; Dragan Jevremovic; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Prashant Kapoor; David Dingli; Lisa Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Suzanne Hayman; John Lust; Stephen J Russell; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Yi Lin; Wilson Gonsalves; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 11.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.