Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 When Public Discourse Mirrors Academic Debate: Research Integrity in the Media.

Literature DB >> 30945163

When Public Discourse Mirrors Academic Debate: Research Integrity in the Media.

Abstract

Most studies of research integrity in the general media focus on the coverage of specific cases of misconduct. This paper tries to provide a more general, long-term perspective by analysing media discourse about research integrity and related themes in the Italian and United Kingdom daily press from 2000 to 2016. The results, based on a corpus of 853 articles, show that media coverage largely mirrors debates about integrity and misconduct. In fact, salient themes in the news include the importance to overcome the so-called "rotten apple" paradigm; the key role of public trust in science; and the need to address flaws in the peer-review system.

Entities: Species

Keywords: Daily press; Media analysis; Research integrity; Science communication; Scientific misconduct

Mesh：

Year: 2019 PMID： 30945163 DOI： 10.1007/s11948-019-00103-5

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Eng Ethics ISSN： 1353-3452 Impact factor: 3.525

16 in total

6. Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers.

Authors: Christine R Critchley
Journal: Public Underst Sci Date: 2008-07

When Public Discourse Mirrors Academic Debate: Research Integrity in the Media.

1. How to restore public trust in science.

Review 2. Misleading media reporting? The MMR story.

3. The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.

4. The blame frame: media attribution of culpability about the MMR-autism vaccination scare.

5. Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: an exploratory study.

6. Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers.

7. Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media's coverage of science.

8. Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology.

Review 9. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals.

10. Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.

1. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.