Literature DB >> 30945021

Effect of quality-switched laser exposure in patients with history of edible gold consumption.

Abdullah AlHargan1, Saad AlTalhab2, Yasser Ghobara3, Ahmed Alissa3, Mohammed I AlJasser4,5.   

Abstract

Injectable gold is known to deposit in the dermis for life, and such patients are at risk of developing chrysiasis post-laser exposure. It is unknown if patients with history of edible gold consumption would develop a similar reaction after quality-switched laser exposure. Our aim is to assess if patients with history of edible gold consumption develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. This is a proof of concept pilot study conducted between September 2017 and September 2018 at two dermatology clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who have history of edible gold consumption were recruited to receive a spot test with different quality-switched lasers in a hidden, non-sun-exposed skin site. The test area was photographed before, immediately after, and 10 min after laser exposure. The test area was examined by two independent investigators for the development of chrysiasis. A total of 10 patients (five male and five female) were enrolled. The mean age was 31.7 years. Forty percent of subjects consumed edible gold more than once, and the duration of last intake ranged from 3 weeks to 3 months. Chocolate was the main source of edible gold. All participants had no chrysiasis reaction post-quality-switched laser exposure. Contrary to our hypothesis, all participants with history of short-term edible gold consumption did not develop chrysiasis after quality-switched laser exposure. Further controlled studies including more patients with longer duration and higher frequency of edible gold consumption are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chrysiasis; Edible; Gold; Laser

Year:  2019        PMID: 30945021     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02780-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  21 in total

Review 1.  Contact allergy to gold as a model for clinical-experimental research.

Authors:  Halvor Möller
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Immediate Pigmentation After Laser Treatment.

Authors:  Chien-Ho Chu; Chia-Yu Chou; Yu-Pin Cheng
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  Gold - Old Drug with New Potentials.

Authors:  Gavino Faa; Clara Gerosa; Daniela Fanni; Joanna I Lachowicz; Valeria M Nurchi
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Lichenoid dermatitis after consumption of gold-containing liquor.

Authors:  M A Russell; M Langley; A P Truett; L E King; A S Boyd
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Chrysiasis revisited: a clinical and pathological study.

Authors:  R W Smith; B Leppard; N L Barnett; G H Millward-Sadler; F McCrae; M I Cawley
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  D-penicillamine does not chelate gold.

Authors:  S Aaron; P Davis; D Biggs
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Antithrombin activity of gold sodium thiomalate.

Authors:  W F Kean; Y B Kassam; C J Lock; W W Buchanan; J Rischke; L Nablo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Cutaneous deposits.

Authors:  Ana M Molina-Ruiz; Lorenzo Cerroni; Heinz Kutzner; Luis Requena
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology of gold.

Authors:  W F Kean; I R L Kean
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.473

10.  Does gold concentration in the blood influence the result of patch testing to gold?

Authors:  S Ekqvist; T Lundh; C Svedman; J Björk; H Möller; L A F Nilsson; M Bruze
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.