| Literature DB >> 30944579 |
Xiang-Kui Wan1,2,3, Haibo Wu1, Fei Qiao1, Feng-Cong Li1, Yan Li4, Yue-Wen Yan1, Jia-Xin Wei1.
Abstract
One of the major noise components in electrocardiogram (ECG) is the baseline wander (BW). Effective methods for suppressing BW include the wavelet-based (WT) and the mathematical morphological filtering-based (MMF) algorithms. However, the T waveform distortions introduced by the WT and the rectangular/trapezoidal distortions introduced by MMF degrade the quality of the output signal. Hence, in this study, we introduce a method by combining the MMF and WT to overcome the shortcomings of both existing methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, artificial ECG signals containing a clinical BW are used for numerical simulation, and we also create a realistic model of baseline wander to compare the proposed method with other state-of-the-art methods commonly used in the literature. The results show that the BW suppression effect of the proposed method is better than that of the others. Also, the new method is capable of preserving the outline of the BW and avoiding waveform distortions caused by the morphology filter, thereby obtaining an enhanced quality of ECG.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30944579 PMCID: PMC6421786 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7196156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Time duration of characteristic waves of ECG signal.
| Characteristic waves |
| QRS wave |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Time duration (s) | 0.08∼0.11 | 0.06∼0.10 | 0.05∼0.20 |
Figure 1Example of removing BW using morphology filter. (a) The ECG contaminated by BW. (b) The filtered ECG signal by MMF. (c) The estimated BW.
Frequency ranges of the estimated BW signal decomposition with seven scales.
| Wavelet coefficients | Frequency ranges (Hz) |
|---|---|
| D1 | 90–180 |
| D2 | 45–90 |
| D3 | 22.5–45 |
| D4 | 11.3–22.5 |
| D5 | 5.6–11.3 |
| D6 | 2.8–5.6 |
| D7 | 1.4–2.8 |
| A7 | 0–1.4 |
Figure 2Block diagram of the CA.
Figure 3Artificial ECG signal.
Figure 4The chosen BW.
Values of the MSE and SNR.
| Signal | MSE | SNR |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial ECG | 0.1170 | 3.0757 |
| ECG filtered by WT | 0.0173 | 8.9145 |
| ECG filtered by MMF | 0.0051 | 13.5224 |
| ECG filtered by CA | 0.0024 | 16.7154 |
The average results.
| Methods/indexes | CC | LO | AMD (mV) | MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butterworth | 0.9742 | 0.9718 | 10.2 | 0.0128 |
| Wavelet high-pass | 0.9801 | 0.9826 | 4.99 | 0.0096 |
| WT | 0.9895 | 0.9890 | 4.10 | 0.0072 |
| MMF | 0.9791 | 0.9705 | 15.91 | 0.0109 |
| CA | 0.9937 | 0.9929 | 2.59 | 0.0049 |