Literature DB >> 30944480

Five decades of northern land carbon uptake revealed by the interhemispheric CO2 gradient.

P Ciais1,2, J Tan3, X Wang3, C Roedenbeck4, F Chevallier5, S-L Piao3,6, R Moriarty7, G Broquet5, C Le Quéré7, J G Canadell8, S Peng3, B Poulter9, Z Liu7,10,11, P Tans12.   

Abstract

The global land and ocean carbon sinks have increased proportionally with increasing carbon dioxide emissions during the past decades1. It is thought that Northern Hemisphere lands make a dominant contribution to the global land carbon sink2-7; however, the long-term trend of the northern land sink remains uncertain. Here, using measurements of the interhemispheric gradient of atmospheric carbon dioxide from 1958 to 2016, we show that the northern land sink remained stable between the 1960s and the late 1980s, then increased by 0.5 ± 0.4 petagrams of carbon per year during the 1990s and by 0.6 ± 0.5 petagrams of carbon per year during the 2000s. The increase of the northern land sink in the 1990s accounts for 65% of the increase in the global land carbon flux during that period. The subsequent increase in the 2000s is larger than the increase in the global land carbon flux, suggesting a coincident decrease of carbon uptake in the Southern Hemisphere. Comparison of our findings with the simulations of an ensemble of terrestrial carbon models5,8 over the same period suggests that the decadal change in the northern land sink between the 1960s and the 1990s can be explained by a combination of increasing concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide, climate variability and changes in land cover. However, the increase during the 2000s is underestimated by all models, which suggests the need for improved consideration of changes in drivers such as nitrogen deposition, diffuse light and land-use change. Overall, our findings underscore the importance of Northern Hemispheric land as a carbon sink.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30944480     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1078-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  1 in total

1.  Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades.

Authors:  Ben Bond-Lamberty; Vanessa L Bailey; Min Chen; Christopher M Gough; Rodrigo Vargas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  A missing key to our understanding of forest carbon dynamics. A commentary on: 'High nitrogen resorption efficiency of forest mosses'.

Authors:  Annika Nordin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Terrestrial carbon sinks in China and around the world and their contribution to carbon neutrality.

Authors:  Yuanhe Yang; Yue Shi; Wenjuan Sun; Jinfeng Chang; Jianxiao Zhu; Leiyi Chen; Xin Wang; Yanpei Guo; Hongtu Zhang; Lingfei Yu; Shuqing Zhao; Kang Xu; Jiangling Zhu; Haihua Shen; Yuanyuan Wang; Yunfeng Peng; Xia Zhao; Xiangping Wang; Huifeng Hu; Shiping Chen; Mei Huang; Xuefa Wen; Shaopeng Wang; Biao Zhu; Shuli Niu; Zhiyao Tang; Lingli Liu; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.038

3.  Carbon emission from Western Siberian inland waters.

Authors:  Jan Karlsson; Svetlana Serikova; Sergey N Vorobyev; Gerard Rocher-Ros; Blaize Denfeld; Oleg S Pokrovsky
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Gross primary productivity and water use efficiency are increasing in a high rainfall tropical savanna.

Authors:  Lindsay B Hutley; Jason Beringer; Simone Fatichi; Stanislaus J Schymanski; Matthew Northwood
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 13.211

5.  Reconciling carbon-cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales.

Authors:  Ashley P Ballantyne; Zhihua Liu; William Rl Anderegg; Zicheng Yu; Paul Stoy; Ben Poulter; Joseph Vanderwall; Jennifer Watts; Kathy Kelsey; Jason Neff
Journal:  Front Ecol Environ       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 13.780

6.  Process-oriented analysis of dominant sources of uncertainty in the land carbon sink.

Authors:  Michael O'Sullivan; Pierre Friedlingstein; Stephen Sitch; Peter Anthoni; Almut Arneth; Vivek K Arora; Vladislav Bastrikov; Christine Delire; Daniel S Goll; Atul Jain; Etsushi Kato; Daniel Kennedy; Jürgen Knauer; Sebastian Lienert; Danica Lombardozzi; Patrick C McGuire; Joe R Melton; Julia E M S Nabel; Julia Pongratz; Benjamin Poulter; Roland Séférian; Hanqin Tian; Nicolas Vuichard; Anthony P Walker; Wenping Yuan; Xu Yue; Sönke Zaehle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Respiratory loss during late-growing season determines the net carbon dioxide sink in northern permafrost regions.

Authors:  Zhihua Liu; Ashley P Ballantyne; John S Kimball; Nicholas C Parazoo; Wen J Wang; Ana Bastos; Nima Madani; Susan M Natali; Jennifer D Watts; Brendan M Rogers; Philippe Ciais; Kailiang Yu; Anna-Maria Virkkala; Frederic Chevallier; Wouter Peters; Prabir K Patra; Naveen Chandra
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Global terrestrial carbon fluxes of 1999-2019 estimated by upscaling eddy covariance data with a random forest.

Authors:  Jiye Zeng; Tsuneo Matsunaga; Zheng-Hong Tan; Nobuko Saigusa; Tomoko Shirai; Yanhong Tang; Shushi Peng; Yoko Fukuda
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Carbon benefits from Forest Transitions promoting biomass expansions and thickening.

Authors:  Pekka E Kauppi; Philippe Ciais; Peter Högberg; Annika Nordin; Juha Lappi; Tomas Lundmark; Iddo K Wernick
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Opinion: We need biosphere stewardship that protects carbon sinks and builds resilience.

Authors:  Johan Rockström; Tim Beringer; David Hole; Bronson Griscom; Michael B Mascia; Carl Folke; Felix Creutzig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.