| Literature DB >> 30943987 |
Camilla Schumacher-Petersen1, Berit Østergaard Christoffersen2, Rikke Kaae Kirk2, Trine Pagh Ludvigsen2, Nora Elisabeth Zois3,4, Henrik Duelund Pedersen1,5, Mogens Vyberg6,7, Lisbeth Høier Olsen8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in humans, and ranges from steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the latter with risk of progression to cirrhosis. The Göttingen Minipig has been used in studies of obesity and diabetes, but liver changes have not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize hepatic changes in Göttingen Minipigs with or without diabetes, fed a diet high in fat, fructose, and cholesterol to see if liver alterations resemble features of human NAFLD/NASH.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Diabetes; Dietary cholesterol; Metabolic syndrome; NAFLD; NASH; Obesity; Porcine
Year: 2019 PMID: 30943987 PMCID: PMC6448276 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1854-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the distribution of minipigs and details of diet feeding within each group. a Fifty-four Göttingen Minipigs were included in the study and eleven were terminated early. The reasons for early termination are provided under each group. The two cases of procedure-related complications occurred during investigations of other end points (unrelated to the present study) performed in the same animals. b Overview and details of the diet feeding in each of the four groups over the study period. BW body weight, FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC diabetic group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, PT premature termination, SD lean control group
Nutritional composition of the three diets used in the study
| Diet | Standarda | High fat, fructose, cholesterol (2%) (5B4L)b | High fat, fructose, cholesterol (1%) (9G4U)b |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates (%) | 74.6 | 40.8 | 40.8 |
| Protein (%) | 18.6 | 16.2 | 16.1 |
| Fat (%) | 6.8 | 43 | 43 |
| Fructose (%) | 5.5 (all sugars) | 17.8 | 18.8 |
| Cholesterol (ppm) | ~ 0 | 20,045 | 10,045 |
| Methionine (ppm) | 1800 | 3500 | 3500 |
| Choline (ppm) | 784 | 668 | 668 |
Percentages are of total energy content
ppm parts per million
aMini pig, Special Diet Services (SDS), Essex, United Kingdom
bTestDiets®, Missouri, USA
Overview of elements in the qualitative histopathological assessment
| Elements from human diagnostics | Score | Type/localization |
|---|---|---|
| Steatosis (NAS) | 0: < 5% | Macrovesicular, microvesicular or mixed |
| Fibrosis (NAS) | 0: None | Subgroups of score 1: |
| Inflammatory foci per 200× field, mean of 3 fields (NAS) | 0: 0 | Lobular or portal |
| Hepatocellular ballooning | 0: None | Hydropic degeneration |
| Mallory–Denk bodies | 0: None to rare |
For each element scoring, localization and/or type were recorded
NAS Modified from the NAFLD activity score (NAS) [22], PAS Periodic acid Schiff (glycogen staining)
Basic characteristics and circulating biomarkers of the four study groups
| Diet group | SD | FFC | FFC/SD | FFCDIA | Over all |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic characteristics | |||||
| BW (kg) | 39.00 (38.00; 41.00) | 78.00 (69.00; 81.00)a | 54.50 (51.00; 59.00)ab | 59.50 (54.25; 64.00)ab | < 0.0001^ |
| LW (g) | 485 (458; 564) | 1732 (1067; 2219)a | 703 (627; 772)b | 2077 (1478; 2439)a | < 0.0001^ |
| LW:BW | 0.013 (0.011; 0.015) | 0.021 (0.014; 0.031)a | 0.013 (0.012; 0.014)b | 0.036 (0.028; 0.043)ab | < 0.0001^ |
| BF% (%) | 27.60 (24.00; 30.70) | 64.20 (61.40; 67.60)a | 47.30 (41.20; 50.20)ab | 54.80 (52.65; 56.00)ab | < 0.0001 |
| Basic circulating biomarkers | |||||
| TC1 (mmol/L) | 1.70 (1.64; 2.18) | 11.94 (11.00; 13.18)a | 1.89 (1.56; 2.00)b | 18.91 (16.91; 27.00)ab | < 0.0001^ |
| TG1 (mmol/L) | 0.34 (0.29; 0.35) | 0.63 (0.54; 0.88)a | 0.36 (0.32; 0.45)b | 1.45 (0.57; 1.72)ab | 0.0002^ |
| GLU1 (mmol/L) | 3.48 (3.32; 3.67) | 3.72 (3.60; 3.83) | 3.73 (3.47; 3.95) | 15.1 (14.67; 15.45)ab | < 0.0001^ |
| FRA1 (µmol/L) | 247 (245; 271) | 240 (235; 254) | 246 (242; 251) | 535 (452; 566)ab | < 0.0001^ |
| KG (min−1)2 | 3.15 (2.74; 3.46) | 2.11 (1.82; 2.38)a | 3.2 (2.5; 3.6)b | 0.74 (0.62; 0.81)a,b | < 0.0001^ |
| AUCInsulin (pM * min)3 | 12,573 (11,507; 20,683) | 27,168 (17,204; 35,562) | 24,032 (20,478; 28,147) | 800 (616–1310)a,b | < 0.0001^ |
| HOMA-IR4 | 0.47 (0.35; 0.42) | 1.11 (0.84; 1.58)a | 1.59 (1.00; 1.93)a | NA | 0.005^ |
| ALB1 (g/L) | 45.10 (42.70; 46.40) | 42.20 (38.70; 46.20) | 45.60 (42.80; 47.55) | 45.45 (32.30; 46.00) | 0.6 |
| CRP1 (ng/ml) | 2320 (1840; 14,100) | 3160 (2760; 6780) | 4510 (2890; 7130) | 7820 (3260; 19,600) | 0.7^ |
| Hepatic circulating biomarkers | |||||
| ALP1 (U/L) | 62.5 (57.0; 67.0) | 209.0 (143.0; 366.0)a | 76.0 (61.5; 91.0)b | 177.5 (139.0; 542.0)a | < 0.0001^ |
| ALT1 (U/L) | 61.00 (51.60; 67.70) | 34.50 (27.20; 48.40)a | 52.25 (40.75; 60.60)b | 47.60 (34.40; 68.50) | 0.02^ |
| AST1 (U/L) | 33.90 (23.30; 96.10) | 63.60 (25.50; 98.40) | 49.65 (32.65; 59.75) | 89.10 (45.40; 103.20) | 0.2^ |
| AST:ALT1 | 0.64 (0.49; 1.19) | 1.51 (0.85; 2.03)a | 0.80 (0.70; 1.07) | 1.73 (1.23; 2.3)a | 0.02^ |
| GLDH1 (U/L) | 2.30 (1.80; 3.20) | 6.1 (3.20; 17.80)a | 4.70 (3.35; 5.65) | 15.80 (14.50; 23.40)a | 0.0003^ |
Results are presented as median and 25% and 75% quartiles. Results for BW, BF%, TC, TG, KG and AUCInsulin in diet group SD, FFC and FFC/SD have been presented previously [17]
ALB albumin, ALP alkaline phosphatase, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, AUCInsulin area under the curve of insulin, BF% total body fat percentage, BW body weight, CRP C-reactive protein, FRA fructosamine, GLDH glutamate dehydrogenase, GLU glucose, FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC diabetic group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, KG intravenous glucose tolerance index, LW liver weight, LW:BW liver weight:body weight, NA not applicable, SD lean control group, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides
^Transformed
aSignificantly different from SD
bSignificantly different from FFC
1n = 6 for SD, n = 13 for FFC, n = 12 for FFC/SD, n = 6 for FFCDIA, due to catheter failure
2n = 6 for SD, n = 13 for FFC, n = 9 for FFC/SD, n = 6 for FFCDIA
3n = 5 for SD, n = 13 for FFC, n = 8 for FFC/SD, n = 4 for FFCDIA
4n = 6 for SD, n = 14 for FFC, n = 10 for FFC/SD
Fig. 2Liver gross morphology. Images show the typical liver gross morphology in each diet group. Bars (partly) visible on the sheet to the left and below the livers represent 20 cm. a SD Lean control group. b FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group. c FFC/SD diet-normalization group. d FFC diabetic group
Fig. 3Group difference in liver tissue content of lipids, cholesterol, and glycogen. Biochemical liver tissue content of a triglycerides, b cholesterol and c glycogen for each diet group. Bars represent median and interquartile intervals. p-values from log transformed outcome, NS non-significant. FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC diabetic group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, SD lean control group
Fig. 4Difference between groups for histopathological scores. Scores for a steatosis, b fibrosis, c inflammation, d cytoplasmic alterations and e PAS-positive staining for each diet group. FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC diabetic group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, SD Lean control group
Fig. 5Examples of cytoplasmic alterations in hepatocytes characterized by hepatocytes with pale, granular appearance. a Normal hepatocytes from lean control animal (SD). b, c Hepatocytes with cytoplasmic alterations both from animals fed high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet (FFC). Scale bar 25 µm. Hematoxylin and eosin staining
Fig. 6Parametric histopathological assessment of lipid, collagen and inflammation plus difference in lobules/TMA between groups. Differences between diet groups. a Quantification of lipid on Oil red O staining. b Quantification of collagen as a measure for fibrosis on Picro-sirius red staining. c Quantification of anti-Iba1 immuno-positive macrophages as a measure of inflammation. d Difference between groups in the number of lobules per TMA from the lobe SM. Bars represent median and interquartile intervals. p-values are from log transformed outcome. FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC diabetic group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, SD Lean control group, SM lobus hepatis sinister medialis, TMA tissue micro arrays
Fig. 7Heterogeneity of Oil red O staining of lipid within the diet groups. Six representative examples of lipid staining from six different animals within each group showing different patterns of lipid distribution. Scale bar 2.5 mm. a SD Lean control group. b FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group. c FFC diabetic group. d FFC/SD diet-normalization group
Fig. 8Panel of representative histopathological findings in the different diet groups. 1st row: SD + FFC/SD normal hepatocytes without cytoplasmic alterations (CA) (CA score 0). FFC Hepatocytes with cytoplasmic alterations (CA score 3). FFCDIA Hepatocytes with cytoplasmic alterations (CA score 3) plus macrovesicular steatosis (steatosis score 1). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, magnification ×40. 2nd row: SD Normal collagen septa surrounding the lobules (fibrosis score 0). FFC Periportal and perisinusoidal fibrosis (fibrosis score 2). FFC/SD Portal/periportal fibrosis seen as excessive collagen deposition along septa and portal areas (fibrosis score 1C). FFCDIA Bridging fibrosis with collagen deposition from portal area to central vein (fibrosis score 3). Picro-sirius red (PSR) staining, magnification ×5. 3rd row: SD + FFC/SD normal background staining of macrophages. FFC + FFCDIA Increased staining of macrophages compared to normal. Immunochemical staining with antibodies against Iba1, magnification ×20. 4th row: Periodic-acid Schiff (PAS) staining for glycogen SD ‘+’ (PAS positive score 1). FFC ‘++’ (PAS positive score 2). FFC/SD ‘−’ (PAS positive score 0). FFCDIA ‘++’ (PAS positive score 2). PAS staining without pretreatment with diastasis, magnification ×20. 5th row: SD + FFC + FFC/SD + FFCDIA Pretreatment with diastasis for degradation of glycogen before staining with periodic-acid Schiff (PASd). Used as control for intensity of glycogen (PAS) staining without pretreatment, magnification ×20. SD Lean control group, FFC high fat/fructose/cholesterol diet group, FFC/SD diet-normalization group, FFC diabetic group
Associations between the circulating biomarkers and the histopathological findings
| Elements | ORO-VIS | PSR-VIS | Iba1-VIS | Steatosis score | Fibrosis score | Inflammation score | CA score | PAS score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomarkers | ||||||||
| TC | < 0.0001 (0.41)a | 0.01 (0.17)a | < 0.0001 (0.45)a | 0.05 (0.16)a | 0.2 (0.14) | 0.02 (0.26)a | < 0.0001 (0.56)a | 0.3 (0.10) |
| TG | 0.001 (0.28)a | 0.01 (0.17)a | 0.0007 (0.28)a | 0.2 (0.10) | 0.04 (0.22)a | 0.009 (0.29)a | < 0.0001 (0.49)a | 0.4 (0.09) |
| ALP | 0.003 (0.23)a | 0.002 (0.25)a | 0.0006 (0.29)a | 0.11 (0.12) | 0.04 (0.22)a | 0.008 (0.30)a | < 0.0001 (0.55)a | 0.03 (0.24)a |
| ALT | 0.2 (0.06) | 0.4 (0.02) | 0.005 (0.20)a | 0.02 (0.21)a | 0.6 (0.05) | 0.5 (0.07) | 0.1 (0.15) | 0.1 (0.15) |
| AST | 0.02 (0.16)a | 0.01 (0.17)a | 0.2 (0.05) | 0.1 (0.13) | 0.01 (0.27)a | 0.2 (0.13) | 0.03 (0.23)a | 0.9 (0.02) |
| AST:ALT | 0.0005 (0.31)a | 0.0001 (0.35)a | 0.006 (0.20)a | 0.02 (0.20)a | < 0.0001 (0.47)a | 0.008 (0.30)a | 0.0004 (0.42)a | 0.5 (0.07) |
| GLDH | 0.001 (0.27)a | 0.007 (0.19)a | 0.003 (0.22)a | 0.2 (0.10) | 0.002 (0.35)a | 0.03 (0.23)a | 0.0002 (0.44)a | 0.7 (0.05) |
| CRP | 0.7 (0.01) | 0.6 (0.01) | 0.2 (0.04) | 0.5 (0.03) | 0.8 (0.03) | 0.9 (0.02) | 0.7 (0.04) | 1 (0.00) |
All response variables were transformed for normal distribution of residuals
ALP alkaline phosphatase, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, CRP C-reactive protein, CA cytoplasmic alterations, GLDH glutamate dehydrogenase, Iba1-VIS quantification of macrophages on Iba1 immunohistochemical stain, ORO-VIS quantification of lipid on oil red O stain, PAS positive periodic acid Schiff stain for glycogen, PSR-VIS quantification of collagen on picro-sirius red stain, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides
Data presented as p-value (R2)
aSignificant result
Associations between the categorical and the parametric histopathological findings
PSR-VIS, Iba1-VIS and ORO-VIS as outcome were log-transformed
CA cytoplasmic alterations, Iba1-VIS quantification of macrophages on Iba1 immunohistochemical stain, ORO-VIS quantification of lipid on oil red O stain, PAS positive periodic acid Schiff stain for glycogen, PSR-VIS quantification of collagen on picro-sirius red stain
Data presented as p-value (R2)
^p-value from Fisher’ exact test
aSignificant result
Associations between the biochemical analyses of liver tissue content and the histopathological findings
| Variable | Triglycerides^ | Cholesterol^ | Glycogen^ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parametric findings | |||
| ORO-VIS (lipid) | < 0.0001 (0.59)a | 0.0004 (0.27)a | 0.0001 (0.32)a |
| PSR-VIS (collagen) | 0.4 (0.04) | < 0.0001 (0.34)a | 0.6 (0.01) |
| Iba1-VIS (inflammation) | 0.3 (0.03) | < 0.0001 (0.39)a | 0.9 (0.001) |
| Categorical scores | |||
| Steatosis | 0.006 (0.17)a | 0.004 (0.24)a | 0.1 (0.09) |
| Fibrosis | 0.4 (0.07) | 0.006 (0.27)a | 0.6 (0.05) |
| Inflammation | 0.3 (0.1) | 0.0002 (0.39)a | 0.9 (0.01) |
| Cytoplasmic alterations | 0.98 (0.00) | < 0.0001 (0.73)a | 0.2 (0.11) |
| PAS positive | 0.005 (0.29)a | 0.4 (0.07) | < 0.0001 (0.75)a |
Iba1-VIS quantification of macrophages on Iba1 immunohistochemical stain, ORO-VIS quantification of lipid on oil red O stain, PAS positive periodic acid Schiff stain for glycogen, PSR-VIS quantification of collagen on picro-sirius red stain
Data presented as p-value (R2)
^Transformed
aSignificant result
Comparison of selected elements of porcine models of NAFLD/NASH and human NAFLD/NASH
| Characteristics | Humans adult type [ | Humans pediatric type [ | Göttingen Minipigs (present study) | Ossabaw miniature swine [ | Ossabaw miniature swine [ | Bama minipigs [ | Microminipigs [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steatosis, macro | Yes | Yes | Minimal | 3 out of 7 | No | No | – |
| Steatosis, micro | No | No | No | Yes | – | Yesa | Yes |
| Fibrosis, perisinusoidal | Yes/No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | – | No |
| Fibrosis, portal | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Inflammation, lobular | Yes | No | Yes | 4 out of 7 | No | Yes | Yes |
| Inflammation, portal | No | Yes | Yes | No | – | Yes | – |
| Hepatocellular ballooning | Yes | No | No | Yesb | Yesb | No | Yesb |
| ↑ triglycerides liver content | – | – | No | Yes | No | – | Yes |
| ↑ cholesterol liver content | – | – | Yes | – | Yes | – | Yesc |
| ↑ ALT | Yes/No | Yes/No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
| ↑ AST | – | Yes/No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Hypercholesterolemia | – | – | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes1 | Yes | No |
Selected histopathological elements, biochemical analyses of liver tissue content of lipids and circulating biomarkers from human and different pig studies. The study of Li et al. [43] is not included as relevant information for comparison is missing
ALT Alanine transaminase, AST Aspartate transaminase, – Not mentioned
aOnly present in Sudan III staining
bNot typical human-like hydropic degeneration (ballooning)
cGiven as cholesterol esters
1Not significantly different from control group