Literature DB >> 30943855

Combining biomarker and self-reported dietary intake data: A review of the state of the art and an exposition of concepts.

Isobel Claire Gormley1,2, Yuxin Bai1,3, Lorraine Brennan3,4,5.   

Abstract

Classical approaches to assessing dietary intake are associated with measurement error. In an effort to address inherent measurement error in dietary self-reported data there is increased interest in the use of dietary biomarkers as objective measures of intake. Furthermore, there is a growing consensus of the need to combine dietary biomarker data with self-reported data. A review of state of the art techniques employed when combining biomarker and self-reported data is conducted. Two predominant methods, the calibration method and the method of triads, emerge as relevant techniques used when combining biomarker and self-reported data to account for measurement errors in dietary intake assessment. Both methods crucially assume measurement error independence. To expose and understand the performance of these methods in a range of realistic settings, their underpinning statistical concepts are unified and delineated, and thorough simulation studies are conducted. Results show that violation of the methods' assumptions negatively impacts resulting inference but that this impact is mitigated when the variation of the biomarker around the true intake is small. Thus there is much scope for the further development of biomarkers and models in tandem to achieve the ultimate goal of accurately assessing dietary intake.

Keywords:  Measurement error; biomarkers; calibration method; method of triads; self-reported dietary intake data

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30943855     DOI: 10.1177/0962280219837698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

1.  Validity and Relative Validity of Alternative Methods of Assessing Physical Activity in Epidemiologic Studies: Findings From the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study.

Authors:  Claire H Pernar; Andrea K Chomistek; Junaidah B Barnett; Kerry Ivey; Laila Al-Shaar; Susan B Roberts; Jennifer Rood; Roger A Fielding; Jason Block; Ruifeng Li; Walter C Willett; Giovanni Parmigiani; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.363

Review 2.  Nutrition and Muscle Strength, As the Key Component of Sarcopenia: An Overview of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Sian Robinson; Antoneta Granic; Avan Aihie Sayer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Mycotoxins-Biomonitoring and Human Exposure.

Authors:  Kristina Habschied; Gabriella Kanižai Šarić; Vinko Krstanović; Krešimir Mastanjević
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Dietary Data in the Malmö Offspring Study-Reproducibility, Method Comparison and Validation against Objective Biomarkers.

Authors:  Sophie Hellstrand; Filip Ottosson; Einar Smith; Louise Brunkwall; Stina Ramne; Emily Sonestedt; Peter M Nilsson; Olle Melander; Marju Orho-Melander; Ulrika Ericson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Feasibility and acceptability of a dietary intervention study to reduce salt intake and increase high-nitrate vegetable consumption among middle-aged and older Malaysian adults with elevated blood pressure: a study protocol.

Authors:  Andrea McGrattan; Devi Mohan; Pei Wei Chua; Azizah Mat Hussin; Yee Chang Soh; Mawada Alawad; Zaid Bin Kassim; Ahmad Nizal Bin Mohd Ghazali; Blossom Stephan; Pascale Allotey; Daniel D Reidpath; Louise Robinson; Mario Siervo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.