Literature DB >> 30943780

Real-World Hypoglycemia Avoidance With a Predictive Low Glucose Alert Does Not Depend on Frequent Screen Views.

Sarah Puhr1, Mark Derdzinski1, Andrew Scott Parker1, John B Welsh1, David A Price1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequent real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) data viewing has been associated with reduced mean glucose and frequent scanning of an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) system has been associated with reduced hypoglycemia for patients with diabetes. However, requiring patients to frequently interact with their glucose monitoring devices to detect actual or impending hypoglycemia is burdensome. We hypothesized that a predictive low glucose alert, which forecasts glucose ≤55 mg/dL within 20 minutes and is included in a new rtCGM system, could mitigate hypoglycemia without requiring frequent device interaction.
METHODS: We analyzed estimated glucose values (EGVs) from an anonymized convenience sample of 15,000 patients who used Dexcom G6 (Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) and its mobile app for at least 30 days with or without the "Urgent Low Soon" alert (ULS) enabled. Screen view frequency was determined as the frequency with which the trend screen was accessed on the app. Multiple screen views within any 5-minute interval were counted as one. Hypoglycemia exposure for patients in the top and bottom quartiles of screen view frequency (>8.25 and <3.30 per day, respectively) was calculated as the percentage of EGVs below various thresholds.
RESULTS: Over 93% of users enabled the ULS alert; its use was associated with significantly reduced hypoglycemia <55 and <70 mg/dL, independent of screen view frequency.
CONCLUSION: Use of the G6 ULS alert may disencumber rtCGM users by promoting significant reductions in hypoglycemia without requiring frequent device interactions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alarms; alerts; continuous glucose monitoring; device interaction; hypoglycemia; predictive alerts; screen views

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30943780      PMCID: PMC7189147          DOI: 10.1177/1932296819840691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  15 in total

1.  The 600-step program for type 1 diabetes self-management in youth: the magnitude of the self-management task.

Authors:  Ronald D Coffen
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Appearance of Do-It-Yourself closed-loop systems to manage type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tien-Ming Hng; David Burren
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.048

3.  Understanding the sources of diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; William H Polonsky; Danielle M Hessler; Umesh Masharani; Ian Blumer; Anne L Peters; Lisa A Strycker; Vicky Bowyer
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.852

4.  Predicting diabetes distress in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L Fisher; J T Mullan; M M Skaff; R E Glasgow; P Arean; D Hessler
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend Reduces Hypoglycemia in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Type 1 Diabetes in an At-Home Randomized Crossover Study: Results of the PROLOG Trial.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Zoey Li; Bruce A Buckingham; Jordan E Pinsker; Eda Cengiz; R Paul Wadwa; Laya Ekhlaspour; Mei Mei Church; Stuart A Weinzimer; Emily Jost; Tatiana Marcal; Camille Andre; Lori Carria; Vance Swanson; John W Lum; Craig Kollman; William Woodall; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  Clinical Implications of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Steven V Edelman; Nicholas B Argento; Jeremy Pettus; Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Psychosocial impacts of hybrid closed-loop systems in the management of diabetes: a review.

Authors:  C Farrington
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 8.  INTEGRATED INSULIN PUMP AND CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING TECHNOLOGY IN DIABETES CARE TODAY: A PERSPECTIVE OF REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE WITH THE MINIMED 670G HYBRID CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM.

Authors:  Grazia Aleppo; Kimberly M Webb
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.443

9.  Investigating the Association Between Diabetes Distress and Self-Management Behaviors.

Authors:  Aneesah Khan; Pratik Choudhary
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-12

10.  Switching from Flash Glucose Monitoring to Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes at High Hypoglycemia Risk: The Extension Phase of the I HART CGM Study.

Authors:  Monika Reddy; Narvada Jugnee; Sinthuka Anantharaja; Nick Oliver
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hypoglycemia unawareness and autonomic dysfunction in diabetes: Lessons learned and roles of diabetes technologies.

Authors:  Yu Kuei Lin; Simon J Fisher; Rodica Pop-Busui
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.232

2.  Responses to Low- and High-Intensity Exercise in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes in Relation to Their Level of VO2 Max.

Authors:  Artur Myśliwiec; Maria Skalska; Arkadiusz Michalak; Jędrzej Chrzanowski; Małgorzata Szmigiero-Kawko; Agnieszka Lejk; Joanna Jastrzębska; Łukasz Radzimiński; Guillermo F López-Sánchez; Andrzej Gawrecki; Zbigniew Jastrzębski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.