Literature DB >> 30943553

Impact of a 1-day versus 3-day low-residue diet on bowel cleansing quality before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Antonio Z Gimeno-García1, Raquel de la Barreda Heuser1, Cristina Reygosa1, Alberto Hernandez1, Isabel Mascareño2, David Nicolás-Pérez1, Alejandro Jiménez1, Antonio J Lara1, Onofre Alarcon-Fernández1, Manuel Hernandez-Guerra1, Rafael Romero1, Inmaculada Alonso1, Yanira González1, Zaida Adrian1, Goretti Hernandez1, Domingo Hernandez1, Rosa Delgado1, Enrique Quintero1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether a 3-day low-residue diet (LRD) improved bowel cleansing quality compared with a 1-day LRD regimen.
METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to the 1-day LRD or 3-day LRD groups. All patients received a 2-L split-dose of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid. The primary outcome was bowel cleansing quality as evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) (adequate cleansing ≥ 2 points per segment). Secondary outcomes were adherence to and level of satisfaction with the LRD, difficulty following the dietary recommendations, and willingness to repeat the same LRD in the future. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were conducted for the primary outcome. A superiority analysis was performed to demonstrate that a 3-day LRD regimen was superior to a 1-day LRD regimen with a margin of 10 %.
RESULTS: 390 patients (1-day LRD group = 196, 3-day LRD = 194) were included. The cleansing quality was not significantly different between the groups: ITT analysis 82.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 77.4 to 88.0) vs. 85.6 % (95 %CI 80.7 to 90.5), with odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95 %CI 0.72 to 2.15); PP analysis 85.0 % (95 %CI 79.9 to 90.1) vs. 88.6 % (95 %CI 84.0 to 93.2), with OR 1.4 (95 %CI 0.88 to 2.52). No differences were found regarding adherence to the diet or cleansing solution, satisfaction or difficulty with the LRD, and the polyp/adenoma detection rates.
CONCLUSION: 3-day LRD did not offer advantages over 1-day LRD in preparation for colonoscopy. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30943553     DOI: 10.1055/a-0864-1942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  How to cleanse the colon after the colon cancer awareness month?

Authors:  Bülent Baran
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of a low-residue diet for bowel preparation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristian Ahumada; Lisandro Pereyra; Martín Galvarini; José Mella; Estanislao Gómez; Silvia C Pedreira; Daniel G Cimmino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  A 3-day low-fibre diet does not improve colonoscopy preparation results compared to a 1-day diet: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Filipe Taveira; Miguel Areia; Luís Elvas; Susana Alves; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana T Cadime
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Comparison of the effect of 1-day and 2-day low residue diets on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Li Jiao; Junmin Wang; Wenjuan Zhao; Xinying Zhu; Xia Meng; Liwei Zhao
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

5.  Educational nurse-led telephone intervention shortly before colonoscopy as a salvage strategy after previous bowel preparation failure: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Alvarez-Gonzalez; Miguel Ángel Pantaleón Sánchez; Belén Bernad Cabredo; Ana García-Rodríguez; Santiago Frago Larramona; Oscar Nogales; Pilar Díez Redondo; Ignasi Puig Del Castillo; Cristina Romero Mascarell; Noemí Caballero; Iván Romero Sánchez-Miguel; Rocío Pérez Berbegal; Domingo Hernández Negrín; Gema Bujedo Sadornill; Alicia Pérez Oltra; Gemma Casals Urquiza; Jaume Amorós Martínez; Agustín Seoane Urgorri; Inés Ana Ibáñez Zafón; Antonio Z Gimeno-García
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  An Enhanced High-Volume Preparation for Colonoscopy Is Not Better Than a Conventional Low-Volume One in Patients at Risk of Poor Bowel Cleansing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Goretti Hernández; José Luis Baute Dorta; Cristina Reygosa; Raquel de la Barreda; Alberto Hernandez-Bustabad; Carla Amaral; Yaiza Cedrés; Rocío Del Castillo; David Nicolás-Pérez; Alejandro Jiménez; Onofre Alarcon-Fernández; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra; Rafael Romero; Inmaculada Alonso; Yanira González; Zaida Adrian; Domingo Hernandez; Laura Ramos; Marta Carrillo; Vanessa Felipe; Anjara Hernández; Consuelo Rodríguez-Jiménez; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 7.  Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Milena Di Leo; Andrea Iannone; Monica Arena; Giuseppe Losurdo; Maria Angela Palamara; Giuseppe Iabichino; Pierluigi Consolo; Maria Rendina; Carmelo Luigiano; Alfredo Di Leo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Yirong Yang; Yuan Xiao; Li Zhang; Jiajia Lv; Qiyun Huang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 3.822

9.  The efficacy and tolerability of sports drink versus water in bowel preparations: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Zhixin Zhang; Hui Gao; Xin Yuan; Cenqin Liu; Zhenfei Bao; Siyi Yu; Haofen Xie; Weihong Wang; Jiarong Xie; Lei Xu
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.728

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.