| Literature DB >> 30943243 |
Jin-Won Noh1,2, Young-Mi Kim3, Lena J Lee4, Nabeel Akram3, Farhana Shahid5, Young Dae Kwon6, Jelle Stekelenburg2,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antenatal care (ANC) is critical to decrease maternal and neonatal mortality. However, little is known about the utilization of ANC services in Pakistan. This study assessed the utilization of ANC in Sindh province, Pakistan, and identified the factors that affect its use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30943243 PMCID: PMC6447146 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of survey respondents (n = 10,200).
| Variables | Category | Mean (SD)/n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Underutilization (1–3) (n = 3,635) | Utilization (4+) (n = 4,886) | ||||
| Woman’s age (year), range | 27.74 (5.78), 15–49 | 27.82 (6.05) | 27.26 (5.33) | < 0.001 | ||
| Number of household occupants, range | 8.45 (4.63), 1–50 | 8.79 (4.81) | 8.22 (4.55) | < 0.001 | ||
| Residence | Rural | 4,846 (47.5) | 2,147 (59.1) | 1,386 (30.3) | < 0.001 | |
| Town/small city | 2,749 (27.0) | 1,044 (28.7) | 1,270 (27.8) | |||
| Large city | 2,605 (25.5) | 444 (12.2) | 1,917 (41.9) | |||
| Woman’s education level | No education | 6,073 (66.0) | 2,616 (74.8) | 1,827 (48.5) | < 0.001 | |
| Primary or middle | 2,007 (21.8) | 652 (18.6) | 1,124 (29.8) | |||
| Secondary or higher | 1,120 (12.2) | 230 (6.6) | 816 (21.7) | |||
| Husband’s education level | No education | 3,857 (49.4) | 1,576 (53.3) | 1,192 (38.5) | < 0.001 | |
| Primary or middle | 2,128 (27.3) | 830 (28.1) | 893 (28.9) | |||
| Secondary or higher | 1,816 (23.3) | 550 (18.6) | 1,010 (32.6) | |||
| Household wealth quintile | First (poorest) | 2,040 (20.0) | 921 (25.3) | 328 (7.2) | < 0.001 | |
| Second | 2,040 (20.0) | 1,003 (27.6) | 530 (11.6) | |||
| Third | 2,040 (20.0) | 860 (23.7) | 839 (18.3) | |||
| Fourth | 2,040 (20.0) | 547 (15.0) | 1,290 (28.2) | |||
| Fifth (richest) | 2,040 (20.0) | 304 (8.4) | 1,586 (34.7) | |||
| Timing of first ANC visit | First trimester | 4,391 (53.1) | 975 (27.2) | 3,249 (72.3) | < 0.001 | |
| Second trimester | 2,320 (28.1) | 1,232 (35.0) | 1,029 (22.9) | |||
| Third trimester | 1,557 (18.8) | 1,315 (37.3) | 213 (4.7) | |||
| Place of ANC | Public care facility | 2,195 (25.8) | 1,011 (27.8) | 1,098 (24.0) | < 0.001 | |
| Private care facility | 5,931 (69.6) | 2,351 (64.7) | 3,380 (73.9) | |||
| Home | 394 (4.6) | 273 (7.5) | 95 (2.1) | |||
| ANC provider (multiple responses allowed) | ||||||
| LHW/Dai-TBA | No | 8,109 (95.2) | 3,351 (92.2) | 4,461 (97.6) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 410 (4.8) | 283 (7.8) | 111 (2.4) | |||
| Nurse/midwife | No | 7,988 (93.7) | 3,409 (93.8) | 4,291 (93.8) | 0.927 | |
| Yes | 549 (6.3) | 226 (6.2) | 282 (6.2) | |||
| Doctor | No | 461 (5.4) | 311 (8.6) | 124 (2.7) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 8,060 (94.6) | 3,324 (91.4) | 4,449 (97.3) | |||
| LHW | No | 7,955 (78.0) | 2,892 (79.6) | 3,422 (74.8) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 2,245 (22.0) | 743 (20.4) | 1,151 (25.2) | |||
| Mother-in-law | No | 6,365 (62.4) | 2,791 (76.8) | 3,123 (68.3) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 3,835 (37.6) | 844 (23.2) | 1,450 (31.7) | |||
| Other relatives/friends | No | 6,365 (62.4) | 2,497 (68.7) | 2,578 (56.4) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 3,835 (37.6) | 1,138 (31.3) | 1,995 (43.6) | |||
| Dai-TBA | No | 8,440 (82.7) | 2,971 (81.7) | 3,956 (86.5) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 1,760 (17.3) | 664 (18.3) | 617 (13.5) | |||
| LHV | No | 9,298 (91.2) | 3,371 (92.7) | 4,059 (88.8) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 902 (8.8) | 264 (7.3) | 514 (11.2) | |||
| Nurse/midwife | No | 9,016 (88.4) | 3,280 (90.2) | 3,885 (85.0) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 1,184 (11.6) | 355 (9.8) | 688 (15.0) | |||
| Doctor | No | 5,866 (57.5) | 2,229 (61.3) | 2,228 (48.7) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 4,334 (42.5) | 1,406 (38.7) | 2,348 (51.3) | |||
| Media | No | 7,863 (77.1) | 2,993 (82.3) | 3,160 (69.1) | < 0.001 | |
| Yes | 2,337 (22.9) | 642 (17.7) | 1,413 (30.9) | |||
| Year | 2013 | 4,000 (39.2) | 1,496 (41.2) | 1,806 (39.5) | 0.127 | |
| 2014 | 6,200 (60.8) | 2,139 (58.8) | 2,767 (60.5) | |||
Note: Numbers may not sum to total due to missing data.
ANC, antenatal care; LHV, lady health visitor, LHW, lady health worker; SD, standard deviation; TBA, traditional birth attendant
a Includes government hospital, rural health clinics, basic health unit, dispensary, other public facilities
b Includes private hospital/clinic, private doctor, homeopath clinic, dispenser/compounder, haki/dawakhana,other private facilities
c Includes radio, television, telephone helpline, text message on mobile phone, health education/awareness session, print media
Logistic regression for making at least four antenatal care visits (n = 8,521).
| Adjusted | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| Woman’s age | 1.00 | (0.99, 1.01) | |
| Number of household occupants | 0.98 | (0.97, 0.99) | |
| Residence | Rural | 1.00 | |
| Town/small city | 0.87 | (0.74, 1.02) | |
| Large city | 1.92 | (1.57, 2.35) | |
| Woman’s education level | No education | 1.00 | |
| Primary or middle | 1.33 | (1.14, 1.55) | |
| Secondary or higher | 1.70 | (1.33, 2.15) | |
| Husband's education level | No education | 1.00 | |
| Primary or middle | 0.89 | (0.77, 1.03) | |
| Secondary or higher | 1.07 | (0.91, 1.25) | |
| Household wealth quintile | First (poorest) | 1.00 | |
| Second | 1.31 | (1.10, 1.59) | |
| Third | 2.03 | (1.66, 2.49) | |
| Fourth | 3.53 | (2.79, 4.50) | |
| Fifth (richest) | 5.66 | (4.22, 7.60) | |
| Place of ANC | Public | 1.00 | |
| Private | 1.14 | (1.00, 1.29) | |
| ANC provider | |||
| LHW/Dai-TBA | 1.16 | (0.70, 1.91) | |
| Nurse/midwife | 1.11 | (0.70, 1.75) | |
| Doctor | 0.98 | (0.75, 1.28) | |
| LHW | 1.17 | (1.00, 1.37) | |
| Mother-in-law | 1.17 | (1.01, 1.36) | |
| Other relative/friends | 1.19 | (1.03, 1.38) | |
| Dai-TBA | 0.91 | (0.77, 1.08) | |
| LHV | 1.26 | (0.99, 1.61) | |
| Nurse/midwife | 1.31 | (1.06, 1.61) | |
| Doctor | 1.14 | (1.00, 1.30) | |
| Media | 0.99 | (0.84, 1.16) | |
| Year | 2013 | 1.00 | |
| 2014 | 0.98 | (0.88, 1.14) | |
Note: Mother and child health information source and ANC provider coded as 0 = no, 1 = yes.
ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; LHV, lady health visitor; LHW, lady health worker; OR, odds ratio; TBA, traditional birth attendant
a the reference category
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01
***p < 0.001