| Literature DB >> 30943224 |
Asma Ahsan1, Adnan Zafar Khan2, Hasnain Javed2, Shaper Mirza1, Safee Ullah Chaudhary1, Syed Shahzad-Ul-Hussan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are amongst the leading public health concerns in Pakistan with a high disease burden. Despite the availability of effective antiviral treatments in the country the disease burden in general population has not lowered. This could be attributed to the asymptomatic nature of this infection that results in lack of diagnosis until the late symptomatic stage. To better estimate and map HCV infections in the country a population-based analysis is necessary for an effective control of the infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30943224 PMCID: PMC6447227 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214435
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1A summary of HCV seroprevalence in the Punjab province of Pakistan measured in year 2017.
Fig 2HCV seroprevalence in different geographical regions of the Punjab province in year 2017.
Seroprevalence in percentage of the total tested samples in the respective regions is color-coded. Data from three districts, Chiniot, Hafizabad and Lodhran were combined with neighboring larger districts as mentioned in the legend. Due to unexpected logistical reasons, district Khushab could not be surveyed and therefore no data available from that district. The map was manually populated, using Adobe Illustrator software, with data obtained from descriptive analysis (percentage prevalence).
Fig 3Sex and gender specific HCV seroprevalence in different age groups in the province of Punjab analyzed in year 2017.
HCV seroprevalence in different age groups of every sex and gender in the province of Punjab in year 2017.
Prevalence ratios and P-values were calculated while comparing a specific age group with all other age groups of a specific sex and gender.
| Age | Total | Positive | % Positive | PR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 | 556 | 34 | 6.1 | 0.178 | <0.001 | 0.127–0.250 | |
| 21–30 | 1036 | 168 | 16.2 | 0.530 | <0.001 | 0.450–0.620 | |
| 31–40 | 1199 | 360 | 30.0 | 1.170 | 0.003 | 1.056–1.303 | |
| 41–50 | 973 | 375 | 38.5 | 1.71 | <0.001 | 1.533–1.917 | |
| 51–60 | 577 | 224 | 38.8 | 1.73 | <0.001 | 1.486–2.024 | |
| 61–70 | 263 | 72 | 27.4 | 1.03 | 0.820 | 0.792–1.341 | |
| >70 | 70 | 19 | 27.1 | 0.94 | 0.940 | 0.604–1.718 | |
| <20 | 1067 | 83 | 7.7 | 0.29 | <0.001 | 0.235–0.366 | |
| 21–30 | 2892 | 444 | 15.4 | 0.64 | <0.001 | 0.583–0.699 | |
| 31–40 | 2908 | 728 | 25.0 | 1.17 | <0.001 | 1.094–1.260 | |
| 41–50 | 2087 | 622 | 29.8 | 1.49 | <0.001 | 1.377–1.622 | |
| 51–60 | 1244 | 343 | 27.6 | 1.34 | <0.001 | 1.193–1.504 | |
| 61–70 | 405 | 129 | 31.9 | 1.64 | <0.001 | 1.340–2.015 | |
| >70 | 111 | 23 | 20.7 | 0.92 | 0.700 | 0.582–4.451 | |
| <20 | 110 | 2 | 1.8 | 0.11 | 0.090 | 0.543–1.523 | |
| 21–30 | 280 | 26 | 9.3 | 0.599 | 0.002 | 0.419–0.856 | |
| 31–40 | 196 | 39 | 19.9 | 1.454 | 0.017 | 1.081–1.955 | |
| 41–50 | 158 | 32 | 20.3 | 1.486 | 0.026 | 1.058–2.087 | |
| 51–60 | 79 | 26 | 32.9 | 2.87 | <0.001 | 1.867–4.414 | |
| 61–70 | 44 | 3 | 6.8 | 0.43 | 0.130 | 0.135–1.362 | |
| >70 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
HCV seroprevalence with respect to different occupations in the province of Punjab, measured in year 2017.
| Occupations | Total | Seropositive | % +ve | PR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beggars | 130 | 30 | 23.1 | 0.260 | 1.263 | 0.841–1.896 |
| Businessmen | 112 | 3 | 2.7 | <0.001 | 0.116 | 0.037–0.365 |
| Dancers | 139 | 15 | 10.8 | 0.012 | 0.511 | 0.300–0.872 |
| Academia related | 5295 | 156 | 2.94 | <0.001 | 0.128 | 0.109–0.149 |
| Farmers | 79 | 35 | 44.3 | <0.001 | 3.350 | 2.151–5.212 |
| House residents | 2555 | 899 | 35.2 | <0.001 | 2.280 | 2.125–2.458 |
| Laborers | 2050 | 551 | 26.9 | <0.001 | 1.550 | 1.413–1.695 |
| Office staff | 1378 | 106 | 7.7 | <0.001 | 0.351 | 0.289–0.426 |
| Sex workers | 593 | 53 | 8.9 | <0.001 | 0.413 | 0.312–0.547 |
| Transporters | 7245 | 1898 | 26.2 | <0.001 | 1.490 | 1.44–1.55 |
| Total | 19437 | 3731 | 19.2 |
Fisher's linear discriminant functions for classification of ‘Reactive’ and ‘Non-Reactive’ cases.
The coefficients of the classification function include Age Group, Sex and Gender, and Occupation. The values for each of these coefficients have been tabulated separately for both ‘Non-Reactive’ (no HCV) and ‘Reactive’ (with HCV) cases.
| Classification Function Coefficients | ||
|---|---|---|
| Response | ||
| Non-Reactive | Reactive | |
| Age_Group | 3.520 | 3.904 |
| Sex and Gender | 7.070 | 7.189 |
| Occupation | 1.553 | 1.453 |
| (Constant) | -13.262 | -14.248 |
Fig 4Receiver operator characteristic curve showing the true positive rate (sensitivity) vs. false positive rate (100-specificity) for the discriminant function for reactive and non-reactive HCV.
The area under the curve (blue) i.e. the accuracy of the model is computed to be 0.634.