Iselin Meluken1, Ninja Ottesen1, Catherine Harmer1, Julian Macoveanu1, Hartwig Siebner1, Lars Kessing1, Maj Vinberg1, Kamilla Miskowiak1. 1. From the Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Meluken, Ottesen, Macoveanu, Kessing, Vinberg, Miskowiak); the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Miskowiak); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (Harmer); the Danish Research Centre of Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark (Meluken, Siebner, Miskowiak); and the Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (Siebner).
Abstract
Background: Aberrant neural and cognitive response to emotional faces has been observed in people at familial risk of an affective disorder. In this functional MRI study of monozygotic twins, we explored neural correlates of the attentional avoidance of emotional faces that we had previously observed in high-risk versus affected twins, and whether an abnormal neural response to emotional faces represents a risk endophenotype. Methods: We recruited unaffected monozygotic twins with a co-twin history of mood episodes (high-risk), monozygotic twins with previous mood episodes (affected) and monozygotic twins with no personal or first-degree history of mood episodes (low-risk) between December 2014 and January 2017 based on a nationwide register linkage. Participants viewed fearful and happy faces while performing a gender discrimination task during functional MRI (fMRI) and performed emotional faces dot-probe and facial expression recognition tasks outside the scanner. Results: A total of 129 monozygotic twins underwent whole-brain fMRI. Highrisk twins (n = 38) displayed greater medial and superior prefrontal response to emotional faces than affected twins (n = 62). This greater activity correlated with stronger attentional avoidance of emotional faces in high-risk twins. In contrast, high-risk and affected twins showed no aberrant neural activity to emotional faces compared with low-risk twins (n = 29). Limitations: A limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design. Conclusion: Greater recruitment of the medial and superior prefrontal cortex during implicit emotion processing in high-risk versus affected twins may represent a compensatory or resilience mechanism. In contrast, aberrant neural response to emotional faces does not seem to be a risk endophenotype for affective disorders.
Background: Aberrant neural and cognitive response to emotional faces has been observed in people at familial risk of an affective disorder. In this functional MRI study of monozygotic twins, we explored neural correlates of the attentional avoidance of emotional faces that we had previously observed in high-risk versus affected twins, and whether an abnormal neural response to emotional faces represents a risk endophenotype. Methods: We recruited unaffected monozygotic twins with a co-twin history of mood episodes (high-risk), monozygotic twins with previous mood episodes (affected) and monozygotic twins with no personal or first-degree history of mood episodes (low-risk) between December 2014 and January 2017 based on a nationwide register linkage. Participants viewed fearful and happy faces while performing a gender discrimination task during functional MRI (fMRI) and performed emotional faces dot-probe and facial expression recognition tasks outside the scanner. Results: A total of 129 monozygotic twins underwent whole-brain fMRI. Highrisk twins (n = 38) displayed greater medial and superior prefrontal response to emotional faces than affected twins (n = 62). This greater activity correlated with stronger attentional avoidance of emotional faces in high-risk twins. In contrast, high-risk and affected twins showed no aberrant neural activity to emotional faces compared with low-risk twins (n = 29). Limitations: A limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design. Conclusion: Greater recruitment of the medial and superior prefrontal cortex during implicit emotion processing in high-risk versus affected twins may represent a compensatory or resilience mechanism. In contrast, aberrant neural response to emotional faces does not seem to be a risk endophenotype for affective disorders.
Authors: Kristen A Lindquist; Tor D Wager; Hedy Kober; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Lisa Feldman Barrett Journal: Behav Brain Sci Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 12.579
Authors: K W Miskowiak; A M B Svendsen; C J Harmer; R Elliott; J Macoveanu; H R Siebner; L V Kessing; M Vinberg Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: S A Surguladze; N Marshall; K Schulze; M-H Hall; M Walshe; E Bramon; M L Phillips; R M Murray; C McDonald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Giuseppe Delvecchio; Philippe Fossati; Patrice Boyer; Paolo Brambilla; Peter Falkai; Oliver Gruber; Jarmo Hietala; Stephen M Lawrie; Jean-Luc Martinot; Andrew M McIntosh; Eva Meisenzahl; Sophia Frangou Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Anderson M Winkler; Matthew A Webster; Diego Vidaurre; Thomas E Nichols; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anderson M Winkler; Gerard R Ridgway; Matthew A Webster; Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Martina Di Simplicio; Alex Lau-Zhu; Iselin Meluken; Patrick Taylor; Lars Vedel Kessing; Maj Vinberg; Emily Alexandra Holmes; Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 4.157