Literature DB >> 30942484

Ecological filtering in scrub fragments restructures the taxonomic and functional composition of native bee assemblages.

Keng-Lou James Hung1, John S Ascher2, Jessica A Davids1, David A Holway1.   

Abstract

Predicting the long-term consequences of habitat alteration for the preservation of biodiversity and ecosystem function requires an understanding of how ecological filters drive taxonomic and functional biodiversity loss. Here, we test a set of predictions concerning the role of ecological filters in restructuring native bee assemblages inhabiting fragmented coastal sage scrub ecosystems in southern California, USA. In 2011 and 2012, we collected native bees in scrub habitat belonging to two treatment categories: large natural reserves and small habitat fragments embedded in an urban landscape. We compared bee assemblages in reserve and fragment sites with respect to their taxonomic and functional alpha diversity, beta diversity, assemblage composition, and mean geographical range size estimated via distribution maps compiled for this study from digitized specimen records. We found multiple lines of evidence that ecological filtering drove bee diversity loss in fragments: a disproportionate loss of functional diversity relative to taxonomic diversity, shifts in assemblage composition driven largely by the preferential extirpation of reserve-associated indicator species, and disproportionate loss of range-restricted species. However, we found no evidence of taxonomic or functional homogenization across fragment bee assemblages, suggesting that filtering was not sufficiently strong to cause a subset of functional traits (and their associated species) to dominate assemblages in fragments. Our results suggest that ecological filtering altered bee assemblages in habitat fragments, even when such fragments contained well-preserved native plant assemblages, underscoring the importance of preserving large areas of natural habitat for the conservation of bees (especially range-restricted taxa) and their associated ecological functions.
© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta diversity; coastal sage scrub; functional diversity; functional traits; habitat fragmentation; habitat loss; pollinator; range size

Year:  2019        PMID: 30942484     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  DNA metabarcoding identifies urban foraging patterns of oligolectic and polylectic cavity-nesting bees.

Authors:  Kristen Fernandes; Kit Prendergast; Philip W Bateman; Benjamin J Saunders; Mark Gibberd; Michael Bunce; Paul Nevill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Joint Impacts of Drought and Habitat Fragmentation on Native Bee Assemblages in a California Biodiversity Hotspot.

Authors:  Keng-Lou James Hung; Sara S Sandoval; John S Ascher; David A Holway
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Urban fragmentation leads to lower floral diversity, with knock-on impacts on bee biodiversity.

Authors:  Panagiotis Theodorou; Sarah-Christine Herbst; Belinda Kahnt; Patricia Landaverde-González; Lucie M Baltz; Julia Osterman; Robert J Paxton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Seasonal Variations of Pollinator Assemblages among Urban and Rural Habitats: A Comparative Approach Using a Standardized Plant Community.

Authors:  Vincent Zaninotto; Adrien Perrard; Olivier Babiar; Amandine Hansart; Cécile Hignard; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Tropical land-use change alters trait-based community assembly rules for dung beetles and birds.

Authors:  Felicity A Edwards; David P Edwards; Keith C Hamer; Tom M Fayle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  Density of invasive western honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies in fragmented woodlands indicates potential for large impacts on native species.

Authors:  Saul A Cunningham; Mason J Crane; Maldwyn J Evans; Kassel L Hingee; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  No evidence for environmental filtering of cavity-nesting solitary bees and wasps by urbanization using trap nests.

Authors:  Garland Xie; Nicholas Sookhan; Kelly A Carscadden; James Scott MacIvor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.