Literature DB >> 30941217

Magnitude of Low Birth Weight and Associated Factors among Newborns Delivered in Dangla Primary Hospital, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017.

Asmare Talie1, Mekuanint Taddele2, Mulunesh Alemayehu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low birth weight is defined as a live born infant weighs less than 2 500 g regardless of gestational age. Globally, the prevalence of low birth weight ranges from 3% to 15%. Birth weight plays an important role in infant mortality, morbidity, development, and future health. The prevalence of low birth weight in Ethiopia was estimated to be 14% which is one of the highest percentages in the world. So, the aim of this study is to assess magnitude and associated factors of low birth weight among newborns delivered at Dangla Primary Hospital, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Dangla Primary Hospital from September 27 to June 10, 2017. Systematic random sampling technique was used to select the 232 study participants. A structured and pretested questionnaire was used to collect data. Data quality was assured by pretesting, training, and frequent supervision. Descriptive statistics were performed for the descriptive part of the study. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of low birth weight. Those variables and p-value < 0.25 were included in the multivariable logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders. Finally, variables which had significant association were identified on the basis of AOR, with 95%CI and with P-value <0.05.
RESULTS: Magnitude of low birth weight was 10.3 %. Previous history of low birth weight [AOR = 3.2, 95% CI: (1.13-9.9)], additional food intake during the last pregnancy [AOR = 5.0, 95% CI: (1.2-16.2)], and preterm delivery [AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: (3.1-19.2)] were independent predictors of low birth weight.
CONCLUSION: Magnitude of low birth weight in Dangla Primary Hospital was high. So, strengthening counseling systems for women through quality antenatal care on advantage of additional food intake and previous bad obstetric outcome is necessary to alleviate the delivery of low birth weight neonates in the study area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30941217      PMCID: PMC6420968          DOI: 10.1155/2019/3587239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pregnancy        ISSN: 2090-2727


1. Background

Low birth weight is defined as birth weight of a live born infant less than 2500g irrespective of gestational age. It is a public health problem in developing countries especially in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. Around 20 million infants are born each year with <2500gm weight, accounting for 17% of all births in the developing world, out of which 6% are observed in industrialized countries and 21% in developing countries [1, 2]. Reasons of low birth weight are mainly linked with either infant/their mothers' side. In developed countries, predominant cause of LBW is preterm birth, whereas in developing countries, Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) is predominant cause of LBW [3]. Mothers who had multiple gestations had a higher risk of delivering LBW babies [4]. The physical environment, specific and nonspecific infections, also plays an important role in determining the infant's birth weight and future health status [5, 6]. Moreover, demographic risk factors such as young maternal age, prime gravid, low educational level, and poor maternal nutritional status before and during pregnancy are well recognized as risk factors for poor birth outcomes [7]. Concertinaing outcomes of low birth weight, the odds of developing chronic diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, type II diabetes, metabolic syndrome, ischemic heart disease, decreased lung capacity, behavioral disorders, impaired physical, cognitive, and psychological function, and having long-term financial burden and chronic lung disease are higher among newborns weight <1500gm [8-12]. In general, birth weight is an important health status indicator of an infant and is a principal factor that determines the infant's physical, survival, and mental growth. It also indicates past and present health status of the mother [13, 14]. But, little attention is paid to birth weight improvement as a means of reducing child mortality in most developing countries including Ethiopia. It was approximated that every ten seconds an infant die of low birth weight related diseases. According to the WHO country cooperation strategy 2008–2011 report, the prevalence of low birth weight in Ethiopia was estimated to be 14% which was one of the highest percentages in the world [15]. Therefore, this study aims to assess low birth weight and its associated factors that will help as a base for other researchers, health care providers, and policy makers for further designing of strategic plan and intervening accordingly.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Area, Setting, and Period

The study was conducted at Dangla Primary Hospital, which is found in Awi Zone, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia. It is located in 72 km from South of Bahir Dar regional city. The hospital was established in 2015 as District hospital in Dangla Woreda, Awi Zone. It provides promotive, preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services for about 100,000 catchment population. At the time of its establishment, about 120 staffs were recruited, of them 66 were health professionals and the remaining were supportive staffs. Now the hospital has five wards, namely, medical (19 bed), surgical (21 beds), obstetrics, and gynecology ward (24 beds) and pediatrics (10 beds). Obstetrics and gynecology wards have separate labor, delivery, and postnatal care services and also have family planning, high risk maternity, antenatal care (ANC), and gynecological outpatient department (OPD) [16]. Currently the hospital serves around 34,200 populations. The study was conducted from September 27 to June 10, 2017.

2.2. Study Design and Population

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among sampled mothers who delivered in Dangla Primary Hospital during the study period and fulfill the inclusion criteria.

2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Techniques

Sample size was calculated by using Single population proportion formula by taking 17.4% from similar recent research performed in Gondar Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia [4]. By using the 95% CI and 5% marginal error (d)which gave sample size of 221. By adding 5% nonresponse rates the final sample size becomes 232.

2.4. Sampling Procedure

Systematic random sampling was employed to select study participants. According to Dangla Primary Hospital's delivery report, a total of 240 women delivered per month. Therefore, 232 study participants were selected by systematic random sampling technique. By taking the final sample size (n= 232), K was one. Thus, the study participants were selected. To get the initial study participant lottery method was used. Then, each study participant was selected using systematic random sampling technique. But, when the selected study participant did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, the next individual was included.

2.5. Data Collection Tool

Well-structured interviewer administered questionnaire was prepared. The questionnaire was prepared in English language and translated to local language Amharic and back to English to check consistency.

2.6. Data Quality Assurance

Pretesting was conducted in 5% of the sample size in Durbete Hospital before the actual data collection. A total of two days intensive training was given for all supervisors and data collectors. Double entry was done to minimize error.

2.7. Data Processing and Analysis

Data were checked for completeness and consistency and entered using Epi Data version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS version 22 for analysis. First descriptive analysis was carried out to determine the magnitude of LBW. Bivariate analysis was used primarily to check which variables had associated with the dependent variable. Those variables and p-value < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression for controlling the possible effect of confounders. Finally, variables which had significant association were identified on the basis of AOR, with 95%CI and with P-value ≤0.05.

2.8. Ethical Consideration

Ethical permission was obtained from the ethical review committee of the College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University. After obtaining ethical permission, written letter was sent to Awi Zonal health department to get permission. Then permission letter was obtained from Awi Zonal Health Department and Dangla Town Administration Health Office and respective bodies to conduct the study. Also verbal informed consent was obtained from each study participant.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

Of the total 232 mothers, 217 of them were participated in the study with a response rate of 94 %. The mean age of the respondent was 26.6 years. More than half (137, 59.1%) of the respondents were orthodox Christian follower, 188 (81.1%) can read and write, and 20 (8.6) respondents were divorced. The detailed sociodemographic characteristics of the participant are described in Table 1.
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics of women delivered at Dangla Primary Hospital, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017 (n=232).

VariablesCategoryFrequency (N)Percentage (%)
Age15-257833.6
26-3610143.5
37-474017.3
>47135.6
ReligionMuslim5423.3
Orthodox13759.1
Protestant3314.2
Catholic83.4
Marital statusMarried18178
Single219.1
Divorced208.6
Widowed104.3
Educational statusCan't read and write4418.9
Can read and write18881.1
Monthly income<620156.5
621-15003012.9
1501-30006628.4
>300112152.2
OccupationHousewife5724.6
Merchant4419
G /employed4720.3
Daily labor104.2
Farmer7431.9
EthnicityOromo146
Tigre83.4
Amhara20487
Others63.6
ResidenceUrban12252.6
Rural11047.4

3.2. Magnitude of Low Birth Weight

In this study, the magnitude of low birth weight was 10.3 %. Among low birth weight neonates, 22 (9.4%) were between 1500 and 2499gm. The mean birth weight of the neonate was 3.14 kg. Fifty-two (22.4%) of the neonates were delivered before 37 wks of gestation. Of the respondents, 136 (58.6%) of mothers delivered between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation (Table 2). Based on nutritional status of women in the last pregnancy, 183 (78.9 %) of women had nutritional counseling and 151 (65.1%) had taken additional diets during pregnancy.
Table 2

Labor and delivery characteristics of mothers delivered at Dangla Primary Hospital, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017 (n=232).

VariablesCategoryFrequency (n)Percentage (%)
Gestational age<37wks5222.4
37-42wks13658.6
>42wks.4419
Gender of the neonateMale11850.9
Female11449.1
Birth weight>=2.5kg20889.6
1.5-2.499229.50
1-1.520.9

3.3. Reproductive Characteristics

Among the respondents, 37 (15%) of them were reported previous abortion, 32 (13.8%) of the clients had a low birth weight in the previous pregnancy, and 185 (79.7 %) of the client have ante natal care follow-up, when we see the gravidity of respondents, gravida one 67 (28.9%), gravid two 67 (28.9%), gravida three, and above 98 (42.25%) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Health status of mothers who delivered at Dangla Primary Hospital, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017 (n=232).

3.4. Factors Associated with Low Birth Weight

Variables considered for multivariable logistic regression analysis were those with a p-value<0.2 in bivariable analysis and those significantly associated with bivariable analysis were previous history of low birth weight, no ANC follow-up, women having no additional food intake during last pregnancy, pregnancy complication, gestational age, and infant sex. After controlling confounding variables using multiple logistic regressions, low birth weight of the previous pregnancy, gestational age<37 weeks, and women who have no additional food intake during pregnancy were independent predictors of LBW. Women who had previous history of low birth weight had 3.2 times higher odds ratio of delivered low birth weight baby than their counterparts [AOR = 3.2, 95% CI: (1.1-9.9)]. Those pregnant women who did not have additional food intake had 5.0 times higher odds ratio of delivered low birth weight neonates than those who had additional food intake during the current pregnancy [AOR = 5.0, 95% CI: (1.2-16.2)] and pregnant women who delivered before 37 weeks of gestational age had 2.14 times higher odds ratio of delivered LBW neonates than those delivered at term [AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: (3.1-19.2)] (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariable analysis results, factors affecting LBW among neonates delivered in Dangla Primary Hospital, Awi Zone, Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017 (n=232).

VariableCategoryCOR (95%CI)AOR (95% C.I.)P- value
ANC follow-upYes1
No5.7(1.2-4.5)1(0.5-28.9)0.06
Additional dietYes1
No3.1(5.0-6.2)5.03(1.8-18.8) 0.002
Previous history of LBWYes1.5(1.8-3.0)3.21(1.5-14.2) 0.001
No1
Pregnancy complicationYes2.1(3.4-6.3)2(0.1-7.6)0.09
No1
Gestational age<37 wks.4.8(1.2-2.3)2.1(1.3-10.4) 0.004
>37 wks.1
Infant sexMale1
Female1.8(4.6-5.2)3(0.2-4.7)0.08

NB: significant association, P <0.05.

AOR=adjusted odds ratio.

4. Discussion

This study was aimed at determining the magnitude of low birth weight and associated factors in Dangla Primary Hospital. The finding of this study indicated that 10.3% of neonates were born with low birth weight. The finding is in line with the studies conducted in India (11 %) [2] and institutional based retrospective study conducted in Korowai District Hospital, Tanzania (9.1%) [17], whereas this finding is lower than the global prevalence (17%) [1] and study conducted in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia (17.4%) [4] and in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia (22.5%) [17]. These differences might be explained due to variation in study setup, population difference, study time, and study design. This study did not find any significant association between low birth weight and sociodemographic factors including maternal age, residence, educational status, monthly income, religion, marital status, and ethnicity. Several studies have shown that sociodemographic factors can influence low birth weight either directly or indirectly [18]. In this study, previous history of low birth weight explained a significant association with low birth weight. Those women having previous history of LBW had higher odds to have delivery of LBW neonates than women who did not have previous history. This result is similar to the study conducted in Nigeria [19] and Japan [14]. The present study revealed that there is a statistically significant association between additional food intake during last pregnancy and occurrence of LBW. The odds of women who did not have additional food intake in their last pregnancy had get more chance of delivering LBW neonates compared to those mothers who had balanced diet. Again the study conducted in Pakistan [20], Japan [14], and Addis Ababa [19] proved this. In addition, this study showed that LBW was significantly associated with gestational age. The odds of women who gave birth before 37 weeks of gestational age in their last pregnancy had get increased chance of LBW neonates compared to those mothers who delivered at term pregnancy. The finding is similar to studies conducted in Mekele p-value=0.0001 [8], Gondar p-value<0.005 [10] , and Jimma p-value<0.005 [5].

5. Conclusion

The magnitude of low birth weight in Dangla primary hospital was high. Low birth weight in the previous pregnancy, gestational age<37 weeks, and women having no additional food intake during the current pregnancy showed significant association with LBW neonates. Based on the results the following recommendations are forwarded: (I) Health Institutions. To reduce LBW neonate health care providers need to work to early detect and manage risk factors that cause preterm delivery of the newborn. It is advisable that those health care providers need to work in the community on the importance of balanced diet during pregnancy and the consequence of previous pregnancy bad outcomes to the current pregnancy through focused antenatal care on the prevention of LBW newborns. (II) Couples. As pregnancy suspected, it is better to early come to health institutions and get counseling about importance of nutrition and the factors which lead to preterm birth to prevent LBW newborns. (III) Researchers. It is better to do further community based studies.
  10 in total

1.  Prevalence and determinants of low birth weight in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  T Tema
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2006-07

2.  Factors predisposing to low birth weight in Jimma Hospital south western Ethiopia.

Authors:  A Gebremariam
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2005-11

3.  Factors affecting low birth weight at four central hospitals in vientiane, Lao PDR.

Authors:  Louangpradith Viengsakhone; Yoshitoku Yoshida; Md Harun-Or-Rashid; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.131

Review 4.  Nutrition and low birth weight: from research to practice.

Authors:  Usha Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why?

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Jelka Zupan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Prevalence and risk factors of low-birth-weight infants in Zahedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Authors:  M Roudbari; M Yaghmaei; M Soheili
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.628

7.  Risk factors associated with low birth weight of neonates among pregnant women attending a referral hospital in northern Tanzania.

Authors:  J E Siza
Journal:  Tanzan J Health Res       Date:  2008-01

8.  Low birth weight and respiratory disease in adulthood: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Eric C Walter; William J Ehlenbach; David L Hotchkin; Jason W Chien; Thomas D Koepsell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Contextual risk factors for low birth weight: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Gbenga A Kayode; Mary Amoakoh-Coleman; Irene Akua Agyepong; Evelyn Ansah; Diederick E Grobbee; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Maternal anthropometric measurements and other factors: relation with birth weight of neonates.

Authors:  Fatemeh Moghaddam Tabrizi; G Saraswathi
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 1.926

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Low Birth Weight and Associated Factors Among Newborn Babies in Health Institutions in Dessie, Amhara, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Desalegn Abebaw Jember; Zeleke Argaw Menji; Yibeltal Asmamaw Yitayew
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2020-12-03

2.  Epidemiological determinants of low birth weight: A prospective study.

Authors:  Wahida Kouser; Kiran Bala; Bhavna Sahni; Najma Akhtar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  Effect of antenatal depression on adverse birth outcomes in Gondar town, Ethiopia: A community-based cohort study.

Authors:  Abel Fekadu Dadi; Emma R Miller; Richard J Woodman; Telake Azale; Lillian Mwanri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Development and Validation of a Risk Score to Predict Low Birthweight Using Characteristics of the Mother: Analysis from BUNMAP Cohort in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Hamid Y Hassen; Seifu H Gebreyesus; Bilal S Endris; Meselech A Roro; Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Placentae for Low Birth Weight Piglets Are Vulnerable to Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Dysfunction, and Impaired Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Chengjun Hu; Yunyu Yang; Ming Deng; Linfang Yang; Gang Shu; Qingyan Jiang; Shuo Zhang; Xiaozhen Li; Yulong Yin; Chengquan Tan; Guoyao Wu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Predictors of Low Birth Weight at Lumbini Provincial Hospital, Nepal: A Hospital-Based Unmatched Case Control Study.

Authors:  Saneep Shrestha; Sandeep Shrestha; Upasana Shakya Shrestha; Kamala Gyawali
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2020-03-26

7.  Factors Associated with Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Zainab Taha; Ahmed Ali Hassan; Ludmilla Wikkeling-Scott; Dimitrios Papandreou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Associated Factors with Low Birth Weight in Dire Dawa City, Eastern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Alekaw Sema; Firehiwot Tesfaye; Yalelet Belay; Bezabh Amsalu; Desalegn Bekele; Assefa Desalew
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Effects of guided counseling during pregnancy on birth weight of newborns in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yeshalem Mulugeta Demilew; Getu Degu Alene; Tefera Belachew
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  Epidemiology of preterm birth in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kindie Fentahun Muchie; Ayenew Molla Lakew; Destaw Fetene Teshome; Melaku Kindie Yenit; Malede Mequanent Sisay; Fantahun Ayenew Mekonnen; Yohanes Ayanaw Habitu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.